Tacticalin An absolute waste of money

Cleveronix A different way of telling a story

Mabel Munoz Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?

Adeel Hail Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

Natalie Granger Being no expert in French minimalist films, I stumbled across this film as it bears my name. Being a minimalist myself, I was compelled to watch it even though the reviews are variable. Much could be written about what Dumas was trying to convey in this film, but watching it is like standing in front of Yves Kleins 1962 'Monochrome Painting'- make of it what you will. Two women (sisters?) go about their day in their middle-class French house of the early 1970's. While the movie narrates the seemingly mundane, there is an undercurrent of mystery and perhaps malice surrounding the child, Nathalie, whom the movie is named after. We barely see Nathalie, but the viewer is drawn into joining her disturbed mother, Isabelle, in waiting for her while staring vacantly or walking the garden in her black cape. The two women prepare Nathalie's clothes and suitcase for her impending trip away to boarding school. The silence is occasionally broken by updates on the radio about the police hunt for a pair of serial killer teenagers who are hiding in the nearby forest. While nothing of note appears to happen, the air is heavy with expectancy, drawing the viewer in. What's wrong with Nathalie? Why do they have to send her away? What terrible, violent behavior does this seemingly innocent child display that would cause her to be expelled from school. The Other Woman/Isabelle's sister? mentions Nathalie told her she would like to kill people and become an orphan. Gerard Depardieu plays, in what appears to be his first movie, the role of The Salesman, who punctuates the emptiness with his bumbling door-to-door sales visit to sell a washing machine. Personally, I found this scene masterful. The women shred his confidence through their impenetrability and the statement "You are no salesman". Their cruel coldness cuts so deeply that he returns later, having questioned his entire life and career choices. He really is a bad salesman. Some may have missed the black humor in the ending of this scene where they finally let him know they already owned the model of washing machine he was so ineptly trying to sell them. They were only playing with him, like the black cat that stalks their house may play with an injured mouse. Others have commented about how this scene was unnecessary and misplaced but I believe it is the clue to what is wrong with Nathalie. The women are cold, hard and unemotional, particularly Nathalie's mother, Isabelle. We see they are capable of emotional cruelty. Has Nathalie been damaged by her mother and aunt (?), and is acting out with violence in a desperate attempt to for love and attention? The scene where Nathalie catches cats to push in a pram is telling. The cats will not oblige and run off into the forest. Nathalie yearns for love, but what she tries to love runs from her. In anger she pushes the pram into a ditch. The abandoned pram appears in other sequences, perhaps as a symbol of rejection. I am grateful for having found this obscure movie. It leaves a mark on you, and it's openness to interpretation and symbolism leaves you thinking even after the credits roll.

Charles Herold (cherold) Two of the four reviews on this site say in essence, "I'm a fan of minimalist cinema but this is too minimalist." Well, I'm not a fan of minimalist cinema. I wanted to see this movie because Duras wrote Hiroshima Mon Amour, one of the greatest movies of all time, but within twelve minutes I had a very bad feeling. You hear a news report, two women exchange a few words, one makes a phone call, then they clean the kitchen table, slowly and thoroughly, then they go into the kitchen and clean up their, and one makes another phone call, and I'm thinking, is this really the movie? So then I read the four reviews here, two dismissive, two ecstatic (but suggesting that this is a movie where the viewer has to fill in the gaps) and I decided that life is short and 12 minutes of this movie is quite enough.

wkkbooks Elliptical . . you are invited to project into the gaps. I find an atmosphere of unbearable tension, depression, grief, apprehension,watching two women living with some persistent post-traumatic stigma, unexplained, in a waiting that never ends. Something to do with the mother's unique, uncommunicable anguish over a very bad, violent, abnormal daughter. We never learn what she did or see her misbehave, we imagine the worst and her most innocent behavior seems unnerving, suggestive of evil. A double anguish, also having to do with a pair of depraved teenage boy killers on the loose in the neighborhood. Did they kill someone in the family? Or are they perhaps family members? Do the two women know something about these boys that the police don't? A numbed mood with its own rapturous nuances, separates them from the street world in front of the house, and the equally claustrophobic garden world in back of the house, the absolutely still house. Great actresses are denied the opportunity to act, a kind of negative violence which causes amazement and discomfort. By bizarre contrast, suddenly a radiant 24 year-old Depardieu, as an awkward vacuum cleaner salesman, gives a hilarious, virtuosic shaggy dog monologue out of Pinter or Beckett. Virtually his first film, it precedes his official filmography; what a discovery. The film goes nowhere, a fragment, a shard of smoky Durassian flint. The more Duras one already knows, the more one can appreciate this seemingly obscure and tedious film.

plix flooberhausen First let me state that I am a huge fan of foreign cinema - have been for decades, so should you be dismayed by the comments that follow, write me off as a philistine at your own peril.I chanced upon this movie and reading the back cover notes on the DVD: 'Nathalie Granger is an elliptical, elusory story about the world of women in which dull domestic ritual masks an undercurrent of lurking violence', I thought, OK, I'll take a chance. Though the director is also credited as the writer, there is decidedly more writing in the liner notes on the DVD. 'Dull domestic ritual?' If that includes repeatedly walking trance-like in and out of rooms (though sometimes it's just the room sans a life form) for no particular reason, staring off into the distance for interminable periods of time, a lack of what humans have come to know and embrace as conversation, so much so that it could be described as monasterial, the comatose deportment of all but 1 of the 7 characters, a cavernous void where a story might reside, well, then I'd say that the description hits the nail on the head - which I suppose, would account for the undercurrent of violence. Overall, the film lacks the sort of cohesion that would bind you to the experience, and comes across as a series of scenes without narrative or resolution of any kind. While I do appreciate minimalist cinema, this takes 'elusory' to as close to infinity as is possible with celluloid. So, if you are looking to for the kind of cinematic experience that is as riveting as staring at an unpainted wall, then this is your film! Though for me, I would like my 83 minutes back, please.