Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Kaydan Christian A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Haven Kaycee It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film

videorama-759-859391 Look, this film had promise, but one feels, the movie doesn't have the full effect as anticipated. Not being able to get past a rape, when she was thirteen, and never been, now hot thirties aged Pickett, who turns in a wonderful sexy performance, has worn down her suffering husband, (Primus) when wanting to make love. Whenever a man appears or she's touched by a masculine touch, she reacts, though one of two of Pickett's reactions seemed, overacted, or may'be that's just how her character is. With her husband gone away, and later, firing a young Chicano stud servant and maid, getting it on, in one of her rooms, she's left on her lonesome, where fantasy entwines with reality. She deals with some very real and dangerous situations, in the form of some unwanted and accepting intruders. This is taking up a few unsettling notches, with a bold, narcissistic writer, who shows up a couple of times, who becomes the charming hero of the peace. And it's no surprise at all, that he's the charming knight in disguise. The film suffers cause it doesn't go deep enough into the core of Pickett's problems. To me, there was a lot of some wasted scenes, the fantasy ones, too brief, not explained well, where they seemed more concerned with eroticism. It's hit or miss, more so, miss, where the end result is muddled, but the film's style is typical Vadam. Primus is very good, and Gene Davis, stereotyped, as a creepy stud rapist, where Joanna Cassidy has never looked sexier. Splendid Pickett does make the film one to watch. Not without interest, definitely. The last scene with Pickett cured, over where the end credits is absurd, is judged with the briefness, prefore.

lost-in-limbo Director Roger Vadim has worked with many beautiful women (Bardot, Fonda and Deneuve) in his career and for this offering he gets a hold of Cindy Pickett (who likes to wander around in a see through nightgown) and Joanna Cassidy in support. "Night Games" is transfixing, but muddled erotica as Pickett plays wealthy Beverly Hills housewife Valerie St. John, whose marriage seems to be falling apart with her inability to make love with her publisher husband due to a traumatic memory of childhood rape. So to achieve sexual fulfilment she escapes to her fantasies, especially when her husband just gets up and goes leaving her alone in their mansion. Every night she is visited by a phantom (from her illustrations - in some striking costumes), who helps her overcome her fears and with him explores her sexuality in the hope of freeing herself of the past. But Valerie's attachment to this fantasy begins to have a toll when reality becomes forgotten putting her in a dangerous predicament. Cindy Pickett's performance is right on the money, capturing the very neurotic state of her repressed character's mind. Vadim plays around with Pickett's frigid character's imagination --- dreams or reality in what becomes a dangerous cocktail of sexual healing ("The dark can play funny tricks on ya. That's all"). The busty redhead Cassidy (who looks great) is the good friend and has some memorable sequences; like the poolside scene and the old-fashion styling in a sexual daydream sequence. Also stealing some instances is Paul Jenkins as a scruffy alcoholic Welsh writer and Gene Davis as a young admirer. The slow-going story does come across fragmented and lean, but Vadim's elegant direction gives it emotional depth in its vividly inspired imagery along with Jon Barry's infatuating musical score that has a sensually smooth swing and the leering camera that glides about the vast estate is profoundly projected."Does everything have to mean sex for you?"

jangu I saw this movie ages ago, in "the golden age" of the VHS. Expecting something erotic and arousing, all I got was a lot of images of a woman running around in different states of nudity and semi-nudity. To sum it up, I was so booooored! BUT...the soundtrack by John Barry was excellent with a really nice waltz as the linking theme. Checking the soundtrack today, the titles of the different track listings are quite silly, but imaginative. We get "The phantom of the orgasm" for instance and "The dominatrix's waltz" :D. But if you manage to find the soundtrack, buy it! It's a hidden gem! And it's also the only reason I give this movie four stars. The score is worth 10, the movie itself 2.

Maciste_Brother NIGHT GAMES is directed by Roger Vadim. Sports a cast of capable actors and the music score is by maestro John Barry. You'd think this would guarantee a certain level of quality, right? Well, forget about it. NIGHT GAMES is terrible through and through. I've wanted to see this film for a very long time, ever since I saw the poster of the movie when I was a teen when the movie was released and boy, did this movie not even come close to the little expectations I had about it. The big problem in this misfire is the lead actress, Cindy Pickett. She's just not beautiful. With her very short hairstyle, she's very manly looking. On the poster, Cindy has blond hair and sorta looks like a sexier version of Olivia Newton John. In the movie, her hair is a drab brownish color, and she looks like ONJ on a very bad day. The reason why casting Cindy makes this movie almost intolerable is the fact that she's in every frame and the story is about her being alone in her mansion. 70% of the movie is just Cindy walking around in her mansion, looking scared. This makes for a very tedious "erotic" flick. The only good thing about this movie is Joanna Cassidy and Barry's score.