Nothing But the Truth

2008 "Don't Reveal the Source."
7.1| 1h48m| R| en
Details

When reporter Rachel Armstrong writes a story that reveals the identity of a covert CIA operative, the government demands that Rachel reveal her source. She defies the special prosecutor and is thrown in jail. Meanwhile, her attorney, Albert Burnside argues her case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

AniInterview Sorry, this movie sucks
Lancoor A very feeble attempt at affirmatie action
FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.
Marva It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,
mooradblil L enjoyed watching every scene of this film. But unfortunately, what comes at the end made it feels like all was for nothing. What a waste of time and effort to make this film.
TdSmth5 While in Venezuela, the US President is attacked. Some time later after the US is under the impression that the Venezuelan government was involved decides to attack Venezuela.Some time later a reporter's story is approved by the newspaper bosses. The story is about how the government in fact didn't have any evidence on Venezuela's involvement but attacked anyway, in other words it attacked a nation on false pretenses. In the article, the reporter mentions a CIA agent by name, which is a crime. The information her source gave her is corroborated by two others. Legal warns Rachel the reporter that she will get in trouble with the government for this.Sure enough, a special prosecutor meets her. He's affable enough and tells her what is going to happen. She will be dragged in front of a grand jury and the judge will ask for the name of her source. If she doesn't comply she will be jailed for contempt. And that's exactly what happens, even though her big-wig attorney claims the whole thing will only be a 5 minute meeting and nothing will happen.In the meantime, the CIA goes after the agent, thinking that she voluntarily spilled her guts to the reporter. As it turns out her husband writes articles critical of the government. At some point she's killed by a hit-man.Rachel in the meantime spends a year in jail until the judge realizes that jail serves no purpose since she's not going to reveal her source. But he also hints at what the prosecutor could do to keep Rachel in jail. And that's what he does. Right after she's released, he drags her back to jail on criminal charges. In the end we learn who the source is and it is a bit of surprise.Nothing But the Truth could have been an intriguing political-legal thriller. Unfortunately, it's not. It's a jail/legal drama based on the story of Valerie Wilson who was outed on purpose by the government because her husband ambassador wrote articles that didn't fit with the narrative the government invented to justify invading Iraq. That said, the script is pretty strong. Of course it presents the reporters as idealists who'll do anything for free speech. But even the newspaper bosses start thinking twice when the corrupt judge, agreeing with every single thing the special prosecutor wants, fines the newspaper $10000 a day till Rachel talks.The movie does a good job presenting the viciousness of government once someone ends up in their sights. They'll throw the book at the person and then some. Of course this only applies to those who don't have a lot of power/money/prestige.Beckinsale is solid as always and she can even make a reporter be sympathetic. Dillon is outstanding as the seemingly reasonable prosecutor with whom you can actually deal with--as long as the person does what he wants. Otherwise he'll use all the nasty tricks in the book to go after him. Alan Alda is hilarious as the ostentatious supposedly expert attorney on free speech but who's in reality more interested in Zegna suits and fancy watches.The surprise at the end about who the source is was effective but it upends the entire movie making it all pointless--the whole trial and suffering but also the whole reporter's stance which was supposed to be on principle. Nothing But the Truth is effective in showing the nasty injustice of the "justice" system but not much more, when it could have done a lot more.
casablancavic This has now entered into one of the best films I've ever seen.With an a very well constructed story, very strong dialogue, fantastic casting and great performances.This film is exceedingly important and plays an integral part on so many levels.The reviewers who claimed the ending was flawed certainly missed the entire scope of the story...in-fact, the ending made it more important than if it had been an inside government leak.This movie surpasses almost every other movie about government corruption and conspiracy and does so with conviction and skilled story telling and brilliant performances from everybody on every level.I'm glad that there are people who have the principles to stand up to this kind of pressure to protect others beliefs, rights and identities, without thinking of how it may place themselves in danger.
chaos-rampant I saw this for a night of kicking back with spy movie machinations where a narrator finds himself hapless in the face of secret agencies, the overlap of manipulable stories controlled from afar. It's exactly this; a narrator has just unveiled a story of intrigue, a newspaper story that is expected to shake the system to its core, inspire self- examination. She's willing to go to prison to uphold principles of revealing truth, jeopardize family.Those were the Bush years. The film disguises Iraq for Venezuela and 9/11 for an assassination attempt on the president as pretext for invasion, but the gist is the same; higher-ups lied to people, fabricated a story to odious ends abroad, willing to suppress freedom for security at home.We're meant to see how the system isn't shook and blithely goes on, how every tool is used to break her in the name of security. She comes out on the other end having protected her source, upheld principle, but at huge personal cost to no change. It's meant to be a bleak look. But it's all marred for my taste by the fact that it never rises above obvious movie-isms like having her husband strike an affair so we'll have added micro drama about choices. This isn't about what might happen of course, but what you decide did in the course of creating persons and giving rise to world. A marriage can be frayed without having it come down to he found someone else. It's the difference between plucking clean synthetic sounds on a computer and going out to to find them.