Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

InformationRap This is one of the few movies I've ever seen where the whole audience broke into spontaneous, loud applause a third of the way in.

Gurlyndrobb While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

writers_reign For someone like myself - English born and bred - it would be sufficient to seek out and watch this film merely because it was directed by Jean Delannoy, a man despised by Truffaut and his raggle- taggle band of new waveleteers, a group of petulant schoolboys despised with equal vehemence by myself for their attempts (luckily without enduring success) to do to French Cinema, which I love passionately, what Stanley Kowalski did to Blanche DuBois. In truth, of course, I needed no such excuse to watch a film which, as winner of Best Film and Best Actress at the first Cannes Film Festival in 1946 (it WOULD have been 1939 but something happened to cause its postponement) had a lot to live up to; Michele Morgan was a given of course; she had been lighting up the screen from Gribouille through Quai des Brumes, Remorques, and a couple of lesser-known (especially outside France) titles like L'Entraineuse and Les Musiciens du ciel, and Pierre Blanchar was one of the men who signed Marie Bell's dance- card in Duvivier's sublime Un Carnet de bal. The story of a middle- aged man falling in lust one orgasmic sigh short of incestuously with a girl half his age with whom he lives for one reason or another both in close proximity and denial is hardly new - Arthur Miller, for instance got a fine play, A View From The Bridge, out of it - and inevitably, as here, it is a situation that ends in tears and all the viewer can do is enjoy the journey. In this case it is a journey that Truffaut and his fellow iconoclasts couldn't even aspire to let alone complete.

dlee2012 La Symphonie Pastorale is a weak film with a disappointingly clichéd plot derived from an Andre Gide novel. The maudlin story centres on a blind girl who is left orphaned and is taken in by a Protestant pastor who raises her and later falls in love with her. The Pastor is depicted as a jealous, vindictive character who undermines his family's happiness by his lustful pursuit of the girl.Everything about this film is weak - the acting, the heavy-handed melodramatic story line and the symbolism of the church organ through which the blind girl mediates with the world.The only really redeeming aspect is the scenery which is well-filmed and provides the pastoral setting for the tale. The Alps dwarf the petty human dramas unfolding in the cabin and provide a solemn, austere backdrop perhaps reflecting the Protestant faith of the community. Other than that, the direction is workmanlike - it serves to convey the story clearly and unambiguously but there is little artistry on display. With just a little more grandeur, the film could have transcended its melodramatic narrative and positioned itself alongside the other great French works of the 1940s.The film's outcome is likewise predictable and melodramatic so perhaps any criticism from Cahiers du Cinema was well-deserved in this particular case.

dbdumonteil My title will enrage the highbrows,but ,after reading the notorious "Cahiers du Cinema" who on earth (and particularly in France) willwatch a Jean Delannoy film ,cause it's " inevitably bad" cause Godard and co have decided it is so?"La Symphonie Pastorale" is a marvelous black and white movie.A simple story of a minister who takes on a little savage girl,Gertrude (a Dreyeresque name!) .For a short while ,it's got something of Helen Keller ,cause the heroine is blind when the story begins.But Delannoy focuses on the relationship between the man who's got four children and his protégée.Pierre Blanchar (it's probably his best part) and Michèle Morgan are at the top of their game and they give subtle performances.When the elder son (Jean Desailly)comes back,and falls in love with Gertrude ,the tragedy is in the air.The priest realizes he loves the girl in a way a father should not.Delannoy takes advantage of the snowy landscapes and the frozen rivers,of the tiny church where the organ becomes a mediator between Gertrude and the young man ,of an excellent cast.He has even got a sense of humor !There's a private joke .When they show Desailly the organ ,one of the men says "Amour,Delices et Orgues!" which was the title of a (very mediocre) previous film in which the actor was featured the same year.

trpdean I had read this in high school French class and am a warm fan of Michelle Morgan, so I rented this recently. For those looking or a comedy, this is the wrong choice.This is the story of a stuffy, humorless and unimaginative married Protestant pastor with several children near a small village in the Swiss Alps,who one day, takes in a little blind girl who has just lost her mother. He raises and teaches the girl everything - and in the process gradually falls in love with her as she becomes an adult, to the great alarm of his family. His denials that he has fallen in love with her - and that he has done all he can to deny her a life independent of the family in order to keep her there, dependent on him and grateful to him, are the source of the drama.The movie is very grim. The pastor is someone any viewer will grow to hate within 5 minutes of the movie! Narrow, self-satisfied, pompous, haughty toward wife, family and congregation, he is truly unlikeable. At times, the dialogue is over the top. At times, the viewer is frustrated because if the pastor's son, or the blind girl, only articulated clearly what they wanted without this terrible deference to the lying pastor, the situation would be averted.All that said, the movie has its power. Michelle Morgan is lovely and sweet. The viewer will remember this one.