Tedfoldol everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Mischa Redfern I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

Clarissa Mora The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

salisburyfrancis There's something about Russian films made around this time which are simply brilliant. 6 hours pass very quickly. Pure Genius

yseban Somehow sometime we just know when a movie is going to be good right from the first scene(s). Everything looks and sounds right, we are fully immersed in something totally foreign yet we know we want in and anticipate something special. This 'Quiet Don' is one of the those films. Strangely though, (bit of spoiler alert here), the first part is basically the story of husbands cuckolded by their wives when they leave for war, I'm not spoiling too much here, you just know the man who cuckolds his fellowman gone to the war will be cuckolded himself when he goes to war. So the epic character of the film and the premise of the Soviet Revolution are reduced to a domestic drama (in Part 1). I want to mention that I wouldn't dream of watching this masterpiece with the commentary/voice-over in English. IT sounded awful and I don't recommend it.... luckily, I could turn on the French subs which I must say are extremely well-written, in a very rustic/country folk kind of language which just fits the Russian these Kosacks must speak. Big bravo to translator(s). If you guys read this, would love to know your name.

Steve Zhang The film contains 3 parts, each of which is close to 2 hours.Here are what I like: 1. This film accurately depicted an agricultural society before the industrial revolution. People used oil lamps. Most people were not well educated. There was no sliced bread. You need to slice bread when you eat. People ate potato, bread, drank milk and soup. There were no in-door plumbing.2. People's psyches were also very typical of a pre-industrial society. Everyone in the Cossack community were Orthodox Christian. The basic moral fiber was well and strong. Multi-generations lived in a large household. Young people were hooked up by marriage brokers. Young people needed family patriarch's blessing before they could marry.In other words, you would feel people's psyches and the society at large were very much like the Chinese society before China felt the impact of industrial revolution.I felt very familiar with the characters and their surroundings. In fact, I felt the men and women were so intimate to me, that I felt really strongly about their joy, anxiety, and anguish.3. Politics was a central theme in this movie. The novel and the film did a great job in depicting the reality of Russia during the tumultuous years of War World I and the Civil War following the Boshevik revolution.4. Watching the film, I hated the communists who pretended to be pacifists during War World I, and then showed their ugly face by pushing the country into a 3-year long extremely bloody civil war after War World I ended.5. Overall, the protagonist, Grigory Melekhov, is a freedom loving, traditionalist with a humanist world view. The communists had the inhumane view of class warfare, and were power mongers.6. It is amazing that the movie makers were able to make the movie without a single brush of communist propaganda. The movie didn't villanize either side. Nor did it promote, or aggrandize either side.7. I didn't read the novel. It was said that the adaptation to film lost the richness of the novel. On the basis of the film, I'd say the story structure is a very good epic structure.8. It is a very dramatic and moving story. With a lot of colorful characters, with rich and interesting characterizations.9. The 4th DVD contains special features. There were an interview with Ellina Bystritskaya who played Aksinya and an interview with Zinaida Kirienko who played Natalya. Both interviews were done in 2002, I believe. They are quite interesting.Here are what I felt could be better: 10. There is a soap opera feeling to the film. The characters are not very deep.11. There were many drinking and eating scenes, which became repetitive.12. The ending is not satisfactory. The novel was originally circulated in 1928, under Stalin's regime. It would have been banned in Soviet Union if it had a satisfactory ending to my taste. So, I really don't expect more.13. All characters were quick at saying negative things, and none were good at saying positive things.

gonethesun921 Beautiful film and well-acted in a theatrical style that is common of many older Russian films. The story is long and involved, and an American audience will likely wonder what the point of the first 1/3 of the movie is about. As described by another, that portion of the film seems very much like a soap opera concerned with who is sleeping with whom. More importantly is how the scandal plays out in the families and village and how the characters are trapped within their lives, culture, communities, and expectations.Americans and other westerners might also be surprised by the 2nd part of the film, which depicts the Bolshevik victory as far from certain, often challenged, with parties changing sides and allegiances as the war weary citizens fight on through tragedy after tragedy.Overall, it's a brilliant film ... a technical and cinematic achievement, for sure. Comparisons to "Gone with the Wind" are entirely appropriate .. however, it is a "Gone with the Wind" with muscles, with combat, with blood, with real tragedy.