Incannerax What a waste of my time!!!

Aedonerre I gave this film a 9 out of 10, because it was exactly what I expected it to be.

FrogGlace In other words,this film is a surreal ride.

Gurlyndrobb While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

Jesper Brun I really like Robin Hood. The colours, the humor, the villain, the action scenes. I just think it has everything to be good entertainment for all. It is a shame that it is rarely spoken of. I find it SO much better than the cutesy and lazy Aristocats which is really overrated. Prince John and Sir Hiss are hilarious villains throughout the movie. Basically a spoiled brat who cries loudly when things don't go his way. It is hard to make such a person credible, but Peter Ustinov does a great job. And he also sucks his thumb, genius! Actually, the Sheriff of Nottingham is a far more cruel villain in the movie.Robin Hood also has these great changes in atmosphere. From whimsical and colourful to dark and melancholic. And the soundtrack is amazing! I don't care what others say, the songs are gorgeous. When the soft and sincere "Love" plays I cry every time, it is so romantic. You really feel the romance. And "Not In Nottingham" sets the perfect mood when all citizens in Nottingham seem to have lost all hope. It also has some of the best suspense from a Disney movie and a good climax. Go watch it yourself. I will not ruin the experience.

aaronjamesmaximus Now the plot is similar to most Robin Hood stories robin and his band steals from the rich and gives to the poor fights the Sheriff of Nottingham and King John but with anthropomorphic animals. However this films seems to begin in the middle of the story after Robin has lost lordship and been branded a traitor to the crown and an outlaw however none of that is ever mentioned in this film as it is lazy in its storytelling and would rather begin in the middle than at the beginning like most well-structured stories. Now this version of Robin is a fox and tries to be suave and witty like Errol Flynn but comes off as an annoying idiot with a cockney accent. This version of Maid Marian is bland and boring who loves Robin however it is never shown as to why she loves him only hinted at because the writers are lazy, also make sure not to google her with safe search off otherwise you'll need a lot of bleach. Little John is basically Baloo from the jungle book and recycles some of his animations from the jungle book as well as the same voice actor. There also a King John who is a lion, but he and his followers are overly incompetent to the point of nearing mental retardation King John is also shown to be a total coward and the only reason he is unable to outwit Robin is because of his sheer incompetence.The film starts off with a stupid chicken narrating the tale of Robin Hood and says this is the real version of Robin Hood and the cringe overflows from there. After an annoying song and dance Robin and Little John walk through the forest while a song is playing about them being in the forest (redundant I know). Then the Sheriff of Nottingham and his men ambush the pair of imbeciles but being incompetent oafs they lose sight of him and easily give up their hunt further illustrating their stupidity. They then dress up as gypsies and do what gypsies do steal and though they say they are not robbers their eyes seem to gleam greedily when they spy the kings hoard of gold and proceed to steal it from him while he and his men just sit there like rocks completely unaware they being robbed even though little john clearly just fill his pockets with gold in broad daylight no one notices and they leave with their pockets full and their enemies stumped. What further illustrates that this version of robin is greedy and vain is when he only gives a small bag of gold to a poor family and is never seen giving more than that meaning he and little john greedily kept it for themselves what irony. Then the worst part of the film occurs the annoying children who are just disgustingly cute and cry like little babies and they just make the film even worse luckily after about 10 minutes they are gone for the moment. Then King John sets up an archery contest which should be near the end of the story not in the beginning however they did start the story in the middle but it still feels rushed. Of course robin wins and wears a disguise that would only fool a blind beggar but it fools the king and his guards and if robin had not been so egotistical about winning he could of left and the king would have been none the wiser. But eventually even the moronic King John catches on and tells his men to seize robin. However Little john is able to sneak up behind king john and of course when robin is found out he sticks a dagger in john's back telling him to let Robin go or he'll cut him. But the sheriff notices the kings strange behavior of letting robin go and sees little john threatening the king and sneaks up on john who get away without a scratch. They then escape there's a cringey scene with Robin and Maid Marian.The sheriff of Nottingham then arrests friar tuck and the king announces he will be hanged to lure out robin into yet another trap but being an incompetent oaf messes that up too and Robin is able to rescue all the captives in the castle because the guards are brainless buffoons. But then as they are escaping robin gets too greedy for his own good and steals too much gold waking up king john who alerts his men to attack but they fail as they lack even mediocre intelligence then everyone is about to escape but robin back goes back to save an annoying child at the risk of his own life and is cornered by the kings men but with them being idiots they let him escape and he flees to the tower where the sheriff is waiting for him and chases him while setting the tower ablaze and in the best scene in the whole movie it looks like robin about about to become fried fox but then jumps into the moat surviving the fall and the arrows being fired at him but makes them wait before surface to provide false drama then they all escape and king Richard shows up to arrest his brother and Robin marries Maid Marian and become an in-law instead of an outlaw. This robin is not the dashing hero like Errol Flynn in the Adventures of Robin Hood nor is he the more hardened warrior like Sean Connery in Robin and Marian the only other robin he's comparable to is Kevin Costner who also made a mockery of Robin Hood but at least that version didn't help to spawn the cringe inducing furries who draw animal porn and dress up in stupid costumes, yuck.

OneEightNine Media An underrated Disney Classic. Disney was the man to beat back in the days. They have had a few missteps over the past few years, if you ask me. Frozen is one of the most overrated pieces of boredom in the history of cinema. Anyway, I'm going off topic because I want to make the point that even though this is a great film by any standards and age, it is in fact one of the lesser Disney animated features from Disney's silver age; after the death of Walt Disney. So yeah. The songs at lacking but the laughs are more than there. But more importantly, this film has heart. It is the classic tale of Robin Hood told in furry form before furry was a thing. I was going to talk more about this but I'm sure if you're reading this review than you've seen this classic already. The cowardly king John and his snake servant make this film exceptional.

tomgillespie2002 Robin Hood rarely features on many people's favourite Disney movies, and there's a good reason why. Disney's original concept was an adaptation of Reynard the Fox, a collection of allegorical fables from Europe. The deceptive fox was seen as an amoral leading figure for their squeaky-clean and child-friendly output, so the plan was abolished in favour of adapting a more familiar folk-tale, Robin Hood and his Merry Men. This sudden change of plan causes Robin Hood to feel almost like an afterthought, written in such a hurry that the plot seems to shift around without focus, and characters feel like abandoned first draft's of the classic Disney heroes and villains.With King Richard away fighting his crusade, the kingdom is left in the hands of his thumb-sucking, mommy's-boy younger brother Prince John (Peter Ustinov). Our narrator Allan-a-Dale (Roger Miller) informs us that the poor are being bled dry by the astronomical taxes set by the Sheriff of Nottingham (Pat Buttram), and rely on the exploits of local hero Robin Hood (Brian Bedford) and his companion Little John (Phil Harris), who routinely steal from the rich to give to the poor. Robin enters into an archery tournament dressed as a stork in the hope of winning the heart of old flame Maid Marian (Monica Evans), under the watchful eye of Prince John and his hypnotic sidekick Sir Hiss (Terry-Thomas), who want Robin's head.Despite the mediocrity of the final film, Robin Hood is certainly bolstered by the impressive array of vocal talent. Bedford provides the charming twang of an English gent and Terry-Thomas is suitably and simultaneously reptilian and hilarious, but Peter Ustinov walks away with the film - his whiny rich-boy Prince John is one the greatest characters Disney have ever created. The presence of such quality British talent makes it strange that a lot of the cast sound like cowboys who have somehow wandered into a distinctly English setting. Some sequences are recycled directly from Disney classics such as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) and The Jungle Book (1967), and some characters are even borrowed and simply re-named. It's an up-and- down experience, where the plot occasionally wanders and lingers without any sense of narrative, but when Bedford, Thomas and Ustinov share a scene, that familiar Disney magic re-emerges.