Spoonixel Amateur movie with Big budget

Bessie Smyth Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

Calum Hutton It's a good bad... and worth a popcorn matinée. While it's easy to lament what could have been...

Celia A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

Robert J. Maxwell It has its dull moments. The crew of an American Q ship, a secretly armed three-masted schooner, try to lure a German U-boat within range during World War I. (Kids, that's the one that came before World War II.) Like Gaul, the movie is divided into three parts: (1) The introduction to the characters and the mission; (2) The longish interlude at a port in the Canary Islands where the crew meet the ladies they're not supposed to fraternize with, and the officers of the German U-boat that's tracking them. Each side knows who the other is, but all the conversations are sarcastically polite. The American captain (O'Brien) unwittingly falls for a pretty German spy (Lessing). (3) The final shoot out between the American sailing ship (aided by an American submarine) and the U-boat. Guess who wins.Actually, of course, it's more complicated that that. The pretty German spy's brother commands the U-boat, and she's apparently in love with an officer aboard the boat (Loder, speaking fine German). We get to know some of the American sailors, mostly used for comic relief.It's splendidly photographed in the Channel Islands by Joe August, who was a Hollywood craftsman and one of the best. The production design is impressive. A ship chandler's shop is filled with exactly the kind of junk you'd expect -- irregular piles of cork floats, anchors, and the like. And it seems evident that whatever could be shot at sea WAS shot at sea. Watch a stunt man do a swan dive from an impossible height.Too many of the performances are below par, especially Marion Lessing's, and she has an important part. It isn't that they don't try. It's that they try too hard, as if it were a silent film directed by Cecile B. De Mille. There are roles (and nick names) that would become part of Ford's repertoire. Sometimes, even the actors themselves were carried over into films like "They Were Expendable." The editor, Frank Hull, should be spanked. Several plot developments blindside the viewer. Yes, we see O'Brien giving instructions to the fake "panic party" but, until the shoot out, we didn't know there were TWO panic parties. And the preparations for the final shoot out go on far beyond the point at which we grasp what's happening. Too many shots of O'Brien crouching on the deck, shouting, "Keep your heads down, men!", while the sea begins to wash around their knees.I don't think the friendship between Ford and O'Brien lasted much beyond this film. Sometime in the 30s, they took a tour of Southeast Asia together. Ford was swept up in one of his periodic binges for days and O'Brien was compelled to leave him behind in some port. End of friendship. O'Brien had to wait until "Fort Apache" and "She Wore a Yellow Ribbon" before being rehabilitated, fifteen or twenty years, which was the usual period for someone in the director's dog house.It seems long for what it has to say and most of the gags fall flat, but, saints preserve us, it carries you along with the flow.

Shawn McKenna In the oeuvre of John Ford his late silents are ahead of his early talkies in artistic aesthetics because of two important factors: actors and dialogue. While he is most known for his sagacious later period films like The Searchers or The Quiet Man (and many others) he has several excellent 20s films like 3 Bad Men and Four Sons (I still have not seen Iron Horse which I will have to rectify soon). Those silents work quite well on a visual level and have a surprising amount of movement sometimes analogous to a Murnau film. When sound became prominent many producers felt forced to exploit this aspect which slowed down movement, placed people in specific positions due to microphones and forced the focus to be more on verbal acting ability. The latter was the rub in Ford's early talkies.The biggest strength of this film is the look and feel of the settings and several nice shots of the camera. One of the biggest surprises is that most of this film is shot on location. There are beautiful shots on ships, on the sea and even some quick underwater shots (the earliest in a film I can think of) which show a submarine breaking the surface of the sea. John had the American naval at his disposal and it really showed. Given there is a possible anachronism of some of the equipment since this movie was supposed to take place during WWI.Then there is the rub. The sound is typical of early 30s with very little music, stifled acting with hammy delivery and a general slow plot.During WWI, a navel command is sending out a three-masted schooner in Spanish waters as a decoy (with a big hidden gun) to lure a famous U-Boat out of the water so it can possibly be torpedoed by a hidden American sub. When the navy personnel go ashore as merchants the captain falls in love with a double agent, while another personnel gets Mickeyed (sleeping potion) and left behind when the personnel cannot find him. The plot is mostly straightforward and the ending is obvious though still exciting. The Germans are treated (like in Grand Illusion) as humans so I do not think this played much in the 1940s.An interesting movie that will be fun for people who enjoy 1930s films as long as they can handle some of the flaws of plot and acting. John Ford's use of camera is quite evident but does not quite handle the plot and characters as well as in his later films.This movie can be found in the huge Fox at Ford box set.

rfkeser John Ford's early talkie is not completely satisfying as drama, due to inadequate acting from the juvenile lead and the leading lady, but it is fairly adventurous film-making: much of it is staged on a real boat which is really at sea. This causes problems for the sound recording and the lighting, but gives it an exhilirating, seat-of-the-pants quality. The high point is a surprisingly intense tango sequence in a Canary Islands cantina, almost as memorable as Rita Hayworth and Anthony Quinn's tango in BLOOD AND SAND. All the action sequences are enjoyably handled and George O'Brien agreeably plays the suave captain as a take-charge guy.

helpless_dancer Rarely have I seen such stilted, hammy, and just plain bad acting. There didn't appear to be a professional performer in the whole picture. And the dialogue! Gad! The skipper of the allied vessel came off more like a cheerleader than a leader of men. I still enjoyed the film; even with all the cornball humor from the brainless naval crew. If their collective brains could be rendered into gasoline, there wouldn't be enough to run a termite's chainsaw. Fairly good action yarn for such an old picture.