BoardChiri
Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay
Roy Hart
If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.
Stephanie
There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes
browncal
lets start with the summary, a horse with a talent for racing, a boy who loves it, sees that it is going to get killed, steals it, hides from the evil persons, and they chase each other around. Typical Hollywood plot. But that is where the typicality ends... now we have a new actor, a nice setting, none of that inside, back projection, blue screen nonsense. Quite refreshing. I will admit the storyline does go a bit over the top. I mean... dying a horse a different colour... is that the best they could think of? The part where the Land Rovers are chasing shergar also... the gaps in the ruins are just big enough for the cars, i mean - no bigger or too small - just right. and did the producer have a love of these Land Rovers? it would seem so as when the camera pans back and the 4X4s have surrounded Kevin and Shergar you can see that all the cars are Land Rovers. and there are a hell of a lot of them...The Script is quite boring in some parts, but then quite Interesting in parts. The part at the beginning is quite gritty and exciting, but it does tend to go downhill from there. Pointless cameos from Mickey Rourke and Julian Fellowes (from monarch of the glen) are not called upon, neither is some scenes in the script, they just drag on and on and on...The action is quite good though - bringing this film onto the up - the car chases are well filmed and cleverly directed - so are the fight scenes. although the scene where the dogs get shot and Kevin takes a shower in front of the horse are both unnecessary. The ending - turn away now if you wish not to know- Kevin and Shergar , Cornered at a cliff by the villains and there Land Rovers, jump off the cliff. (to avoid being shot) Kevin is then picked up by Ian Holm and his daughter as he floats and is drowning. He is saved but shergar is lost.all in all, i thoroughly Enjoyed this film. It is worth a go if you like horses, Land Rovers or are a big Hollywood fan. if you are neither - don't bother.
Cristi_Ciopron
Rourke does his usual bit part,as a sinister,rancorous,Neanderthalian,ferocious,evil jerk,in the same mold as in "Picture Claire","Out in Fifty","Get Carter","Double Team" and the rest of the garbage he happens to be in.He has very few lines.Of course,all this is just junk,undervaluing Rourke,abasing him,and doesn't matter for his characterization as an actor.Still ,after seeing "A Prayer ...","Johnny Handsome","Barfly","9 1/2 Weeks","Year of the Dragon",etc.,etc.,for many years I considered Rourke an outstanding,smart,intelligent man.I think he has changed since.He looks callous,calcined."He went about with gloomy looks;/Despair inhabited his breast/And made the man a perfect pest."(Belloc,"The Example").I had absolutely no other reason to watch this dull movie except that Rourke was in.
Philip Van der Veken
Little did I know what this movie would be like when I taped it. Next to the fact that it was a drama, the title "Shergar" was about the only thing that I knew, making me think that this would be an Asian movie. I had never heard of that name before and I certainly didn't know that it once belonged to a famous race horse that was kidnapped in 1983. I don't even know if it ever made it to the news over here and even if it did I wouldn't have noticed it, being only five years old at the time...Shergar is a race horse that has been kidnapped by a sub-group of the IRA. They have hidden it on a farm far away from where they abducted it and now ask for a ransom of five million pounds. The government isn't willing to pay, afraid that the money will be used to buy new weapons and explosives, and decides not to give in. The kidnappers are furious and decide to shoot the horse, to cut of its head, to bury it on the farm and to send the head to an important news paper as proof of what they have done. But they haven't thought of one person. An orphan boy who works at the farm and who loves horses, decides to save Shergar by fleeing with him into the countryside where the IRA and the police hopefully will not find him...Many people really seem to hate this movie, but I must say that I quite liked it. Was it an excellent movie then? No, definitely not. It was sometimes a bit too unbelievable and predictable, especially at the end, but overall the quality is OK. Take for instance the story of the movie. Let's forget about the fact that this was based on true events, but with a large fictional part added to it. If you see it as an entirely new story (like I did), then this is quite believable and original. I liked the idea of the IRA kidnapping a horse, a boy who takes care of it and tries to save it,... Also OK was the acting, although I can't say that it ever exceeded the average TV-movie standards, which isn't even that surprising if you know that many of the actors don't have any experience or have played in this kind of movies more often than in normal cinema productions. But like I already said, this is far from a perfect movie. Especially the ending wasn't good. I still want to forget about the fact that the boy should have turned himself in by going to the police and admitting that he tried to save the horse, instead of running for them. But what I really didn't buy was the corny ending. I really wonder if Dennis C. Lewiston couldn't come up with anything better than what he did now? I guess the fact that I don't know anything about the actual events made it possible for me to forget about the fact that this movie, even though based on real events, is purely fictional. When I started watching this movie, I didn't know anything about Shergar and its kidnapping, let alone that I would have seen the difference between what was real and what was fictional. It's not the best movie ever, but I liked the biggest part of it. That's why I give it a 7/10.
chriskh
This was sufficiently intriguing to have me navigate for a reminder as to what really did happen to Shergar (so far as is known). Well, the probable answer is that he was shot within days by the kidnappers because they couldn't control him. But for those who hang on to more imaginative solutions to their mysteries, or who just want to see a film about an orphan boy who loves horses, with some tight-corner escape sequences, a nice old man who muses on the meaning of life, a bit of love interest and yards of Irish scenery (shot on the Isle of Man, it seems)accompanied by the usual sort of Hollywood-Irish music, here you are then, watch and enjoy. I doubt if it was worth roping in heavyweights like Holm and Rourke to make it, though.
