Scanialara You won't be disappointed!

Diagonaldi Very well executed

HottWwjdIam There is just so much movie here. For some it may be too much. But in the same secretly sarcastic way most telemarketers say the phrase, the title of this one is particularly apt.

Frances Chung Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

ultrasween Witness the acting prowess of Eric Freeman as he delivers immortal lines like:"... I... Don't... SLEEP!""Naughty!"and the greatest moment captured on film... ever!"GARBAGE DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Mr.Crow People are saying this movie is horrible, which I can see why, it is a huge step down from the original in every way. Do yourself a favor and skip the first hour of the movie, it is a literal recap of the first movie, I don't mind it when movies decide to make a different pov of an interesting story but this is literally shot for shot footage of the original movie.I basically think the director wanted make a second film, but ran out of time and just put this sloppy mess together.Other than that the main characters overacting is worth to watch it a least once just for a laugh. I MEAN COME ON HE KILLS A GUY WITH AN UMBRELLA, WHAT MORE DO YOU GUYS WANT?

PeterMitchell-506-564364 This was a no need for a horror sequel. An unbelievable amount of screen time is wasted on flashback footage in the first one, that stands superior to this trash. We have a way over acted Freeman as Ricky, the younger surviving brother of the first after the other maniacal brother was shot down in front of his young eyes, in it's finale. In this one, of all the nerve to have a movie, where mass murderer brother Ricky is being interviewed by a psychiatrist, out to find his motivations, among long intermittent flashbacks. When Ricky cracks in front of girlfriend Cayton, killing an ex, then Cayton, while continuing his rampage, shooting down neighborhood folk, save for a little girl, it's just futile and this massacre doesn't make sense. The way in which he kills his victims, apart from the ones who are shot, are just pathetic. Remember, it's a horror. Horror films require knives, etc, not guns, which made that massacre, incredibly stupid and totally out of whack. Somehow this sequel got all it's s..t wrong. I do admit, Freeman is fun to watch. Not so is this film, some of it's stars, and I'm really talking minor roles, mostly, giving such hammy performances, they ought to be hammered. The actors in the first one were so much better (professional). This film really goes nowhere or explain Freeman's motivations, as he's too far gone to level with the doc, or he's just too much of a sickopath, which just devalues it more. One stupid horror, sequel.

ersinkdotcom "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2" is nothing but so bad it's good. Most of Eric Freeman's acting is done with his eyebrows. This begs the question, "How can someone overact using their eyebrows?" Believe me when I say it can be done.It's easy to get through "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2" if you just fast forward through all the scenes from the first film. You're left with about 45 minutes of wonderfully bad dialogue and a few madcap slayings you'll never forget. Just don't mistakenly skip through any of the parts in the room where the psychiatrist and Ricky are talking. There are some funny exchanges between the two of them you won't want to miss.