CheerupSilver Very Cool!!!

Matcollis This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Leoni Haney Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.

dead poet I will attempt to review the vomit gore trilogy as a whole and save myself and everyone time.We must look at Lucifer valentines facade. In interviews he always goes on about how he was in a sexual relationship with his younger sister which he raised single handedly. She was a BLIND catatonic schizophrenic. this diagnosis doesn't even exists as it is now labelled as dissociative identity disorder.keep in mind more than half of clinical psychiatrist agree this disease is 100% caused by childhood trauma meaning it has 0 chances of being biological. considering this, how can Lucifer say she drowned herself in the bathtub after recreating a scene from SVD. this is obscured? does anyone see the problem with his statement yet?? how about now? how does a blind girl recreate something she SAW in a film. his girlfriends quote above is i would die for you, i would even kill for you.see where i am heading with this.something is seriously wrong with this account of his sisters demise. this pompous d*ck has the nerve to say his movies reflect quantum theory and higher levels of the human organism and consciousness. I'm sorry but saying i got abducted in 1973 and repeating this phrase 30 times while changing the date does not in anyway relate to quantum mechanics or the spiritual realm.how about the octopus on head scene in RGS.I think it went like this in real life. oh damn we forgot to use an octopus in the intestine puke scene. what do we do. LV chugs beers as he ponders. sets beer bottle on table put the octopus on his head walks in front of camera and shoves finger in mouth then pukes! *recycle*yeah the fx's are so bad you can tell the girls intestine is an octopus.i guess he never heard of using pig intestines.his drawings look like a 12 year old.he is too afraid to stand in public which makes me wonder if he is even a real person.i must admit the film is disturbing due to it being a scat film. for a horror movie it is very depraved and demented. you can't compare it to real scat films and say they are more disturbing because they are in a different spectrum of film. i hate the non stop cutting of film which actually makes the film less shocking. scenes are so fast you never really have time to absorb how messed up they are. again another attempt at being non linear or quantum theory w.e....just watch the non linear film waking life. This is a surrealist movie about the human condition in altered states and references quantum theory. as for his satanic title. please ...... anyone who knows anything about satanism knows its church only accepts the rich and powerful. They teach to destroy psychic vampires that drain your energy. so broken souls and schizophrenic sisters would be killed in a true satanic family.this guy is a joke. if he was to write a book it would only be pictures. i don't know which is easier to attack the films or the man behind them. i tend to think they are one of the same. a total fraud.i know you killed her! keep listening to burzum you Nazi!!! and stop connecting yourself to sun o))). fake intellectualism really makes me angry I'm sorry people.still BLIND people who can see.. This is a new one. There is a mystery to be unlocked here, possible more disturbing then the films themselves.

pmcguireumc One of the reviews on here stated that watching this film was like watching an extended bad music video. In many ways, this is true.All I can say is that if I were Satan, i would banish the director to a lifetime of sermons and hotel stays with Ted Haggard (the evangelical pastor who got in trouble for meth and gay trysts). I can handle gore, if there is a story or purpose. I am a normal heterosexual guy, so i enjoy my fair share of nudity in a film, and will tolerate a bad film in many instances if the female lead is attractive.While the lead in this film (Lavey) is attractive, there is nothing redemptive in this exercise of high schoolish direction to make the 70 minutes worth while. Gratuitous nudity, sure. A plot - maybe somewhere in the back of the LSD laden mind that directed and produced it. A purpose? Not at all.Satan, to paraphrase Sam Kinison i believe, needs to pay less attention to writing songs for top 40 radio and get back to reigning in some of these directors wasting celluloid in his name. Please allow me to introduce myself, hope you stay away from this tripe.

patrik stash Vomit-gore..the next big thing???its possible y'know,nobody thought country music would take over the world but they're line dancing in Tumbridge wells these days.Anyway...i see this film as Twilight's evil twin,a whiny self-pitying look at my pretty hair pile of cardboard cut-outs,a Dennis Wheatly rip-off made by the 30 yr old fat guy with the beard that wears his baseball cap real low and hangs around the train station with his crew of underage school kids passing on emotional wisdom and bleak poetry.I cant be bothered to actually discuss the plot or the acting,its all bad,cheap,nasty,shallow but worst of all its boring,mind-numbingly so.In short,this picture wasn't disturbing or vile or sick and twisted,it was just poor.

trashgang I have waited to watch the Lucifer flicks until the trilogy was out. Due only one, his first, flick appears on IMDb I will review the trilogy here. The first one is Slaughtered Vomit Dolls. It's the worst part of the trilogy but still it's graphic. There is a lot of nudity and some gore appears on the screen but it's not that you can't take it. A lot of vomit is going on, a bit too much here to really say it's a good flick. The movie is watchable due the editing and the weird sounds used. Being myself into the Gothic scene I heard it all before so for me it wasn't that strange at all. SVD is more about the nudity without really extreme violence. Part 2, Regoregitated Sacrifice is something completely different. I have the extreme limited edition signed by Lucifer. Here I can imagine that some people are thinking that they are watching a snuff. The violence is well done and the gore is as graphic and disgusting as it can be. There is more nudity and even that is shown in a more explicit way. Pussies are all over the screen. Of course vomit takes a main part in it but this was for me the best of the trilogy. If you are not into explicit gore or into extreme sex than you better not watch this. Girls are licking each other, cutting each other with knifes and drinking their blood, pissing in glasses and drink it. The goriest part is the decapitation of a 18 year old whore, putting a spider into a vagina and sewing it. Part 3, Slow Tortured Puke Chamber takes it a bit further. The gore is a bit over the top and it becomes a bit laughable. The fetus scene is what I refer to. But it's the girls and what they do that will sicken most of the viewers. A cross with Jesus on it goes into vagina's and they start masturbating with it. Then they go vomiting on the cross. Pissing in mouths, drinking it, really, this is surely not for the squeamish. Again, it's really hard to get official copies of this trilogy. It's been re-issued on Unearthed label but you know, after a while those will also become pricey.Gore 3/5 Nudity 3,5/5 Effects 2/5 Story 1/5 Comedy 0/5