SpecialsTarget Disturbing yet enthralling

Twilightfa Watch something else. There are very few redeeming qualities to this film.

TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.

Nicole I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

He_who_lurks From what I understand, this is not the only Sandow film out there. Edison made several films on this strong guy, but I've only seen the one included on "The Great Train Robbery and other Primary Works" disc. And apparently that one is the first.Originally entitled "Souvenir Strip of the Edison Kinetoscope" I'm guessing Edison and Co thought this would be their only film about Sandow. So when they made others they changed its name to "Sandow No. 1". About 20 seconds long (the version on the DVD I own is that long because it was under-cranked a tiny bit) this short features Sandow showing off his muscles. That is all. While it might've (hey, I made a joke, ha ha) been nice for him to actually perform a stunt or two, what's here isn't all that bad and while it might (there I go again) be only mildly impressive it is history. And, considering the Edison film strips were only about that long at the time, you can't really blame them.Worth seeing, but more for the fact it's a piece of history than for entertainment. Too bad Sandow isn't still alive, I could've learned something from him...

Horst in Translation ([email protected]) Eugen Sandow appeared in quite a few very early short film late in the 19th century and early in the 20th, but at least about this one here, i cannot really see the appeal. He wears nothing but a slip (and a prominent mustache) and shows us his repertoire of how he loves to flex his very well-trained muscles. Maybe a vintage Schwarzenegger, but I can not really see any redeemable or artistic qualities in this 45-second (fairly long for that time) short film by silent movie pioneer William K.L. Dickson. It's all posing, but I wasn't impressed beyond the physical strength. Definitely one of the director's weaker films, but with his quantity not everyone can be a winner.

Michael_Elliott Sandow (1894) Carmencita (1894) Boxing Cats (1894) Caicedo With Pole (1894) Annabelle Butterfly Dance (1894)Cockfight, no. 2 (1894) These six shorts from Edison, still early in the movie game, are rather interesting because of the self promoting factor in them. It's clear a few famous folks thought appearing in movies might bring more people to their actual show and on that level these shorts remain very interesting today. That's especially true when you consider the lack of footage of such acts. Sandow is Eugene Sandow, the man who claimed to be the strongest in the world. Shot on March 6, 1894, we see Sandow flexing in various ways in front of the camera. I'm not sure what he was thinking at the time of shooting but seeing this today is quite a laugh. Carmencita is the famous dancer doing her belly dance on screen making her the first woman to appear in an American movie. The film has become somewhat famous over the past several years because of various documentaries doing studies about early sexuality and how it caused so much controversy. This film, as innocent as they come, did strike a bit of outrage when originally released so it's fun to look at with that in mind. It's also worth noting that this was the first movie listed on the IMDb. Boxing Cats would have PETA members throwing a fit today but in 1894 seeing two animals fight, in a funny manor, was quite entertaining. Prof. Welton can be seen in the center of the frame directing his two cats, with boxing gloves on, to fight. This is actually pretty funny and it's worth noting that the cats throw more punches than a lot of the real fights that were filmed around this time with humans. Caicedo With Pole has hire-wire specialist Juan Caicedo jumping, bouncing and flipping on his wire, which must have been an amazing site when originally released. Annabelle Butterfly Dance features the famous Annabelle Moore dancing around a stage in a white outfit with wings attached. This here probably remains one of the most viewed shorts from this era with its images being shown throughout the world when it comes to exploring early cinema. Cockfight, no. 2 would be controversial today as it features two birds going after one another while two men in the background make bets. This was actually a remake so to speak as the original film was released earlier in the year and was apparently so popular that the prints wore out, which caused the studio to make this version. Apparently the original version didn't feature the men in the background.

Boba_Fett1138 This is the first Edison film that actually features a 'celiberity', which makes this a bit more than just another typical usual Edison Manufacturing Company film, by William K.L. Dickson.The man in the film was Eugen Sandow (real name Friederich Wilhelm Mueller). He claimed to have been the strongest person alive at the time and who knows, maybe he was. I mean, it was not like bodybuilding was an extremely popular or common thing back in 1894. He was quite a celebrity back in his time and had friends in the highs societies of which Thomas Edison also appeared to be one of. He also seemed to be a generous person, who also contributed a lot to the world of bodybuilding. Some of his influences and ideas are even still notable today.He takes lots of different positions within this short film, exhibiting his muscular physique. Sometimes he goes a bit out of frame with his arms, which of course obviously was not intended and sort of makes you question if Edison and Co. were also happy with the result.Even though he was only 27 at the time, he looked much older. He also died at a fairly young age of 58 years. But who knows, perhaps he looks old in this because the image quality of course also isn't the highest.Perhaps historical a significant film because of the person that's featuring in it, but from a more experimentally significant kind of view, this film doesn't add an awful lot.6/10http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/