StyleSk8r
At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.
Derry Herrera
Not sure how, but this is easily one of the best movies all summer. Multiple levels of funny, never takes itself seriously, super colorful, and creative.
FountainPen
It should be possible to rate a movie ZERO ~~ this abortion certainly deserves that. It is proof absolute that a movie should NOT be made by a group of juvenile idiots with no talent and released to the public. There ought to be a governing body that prevents RUBBISH such as this from reaching our screens or coming out on DVD. At least this cost me next to nothing, was part of a very large bulk purchase I made on eBay. There is nothing positive I can say about this flick. It was flicking awful in every respect. From acting to cinematography this film STINKS out loud. Stay away from it. RATING: ZERO out of ten !
Lokii321
What did I just watch? This is not a movie its like watching someones home movie that has been capture at night on an old Hi8 Camcorder.Its dark, the visual effects are poor and annoying and the story (if there is one) does not make sense. Its full of what looks like archive footage and blurry images and is basically three people walking!! I cannot say anymore because I am so stunned that something this bad is actually being distributed and innocent people are being robbed of their hard earned money to rent it on iTunes or Amazon or buy it for about £10 at places like HMV. I would rather burn £10 than buy a film like this.
M. Qtips (M_Qtips)
Three film students travel to Maryland to make a student film about a local urban legend... The Blair Witch. The three went into the woods on a two day hike to find the Blair Witch, and never came back. One year later, the students' film and video was found in the woods. The footage was compiled and made into a movie. Specter.No. Kidding. Despite the remarkable similarities, this is NOT "The Blair Witch Project". Well, it's what Blair Witch would have been if it was set in Santa Cruz instead of Maryland. I don't want to go into the parallels so I don't have any spoilers, but, I mean, come on guys, couldn't you at least have written a new ending? It's a shame this film relies so heavily on clichés lifted straight from Blair Witch, because it actually shows some promise otherwise. Anyone who has never seen Blair Witch will very likely find this as suspenseful as the filmmaker likely intends, as well as creepy in all the right places. Plus it's paced pretty well. But substituting nauseating first-person camera-work—here supplemented by occasional visual "technical difficulties", noise, and distortion making it even harder to watch—and barely-unexplained visual creepiness for plot development, originality, and genuine depth was already played out long before this crew ever climbed Tree 9, climbed down into the Hell Hole, or burned rubber up Empire Grade.They do bring a small sprinkling of new ideas to the formula—correcting Lost Boys' total breach of realism by depicting two or more people from Santa Cruz in one place together without drugs being ingested—and shows fleeting snatches of effective (if never adequately explained) visual frights, rather than BWP's audio-only presentation of the things that go bump in the dark woods.And, really, in this case the first-person perspective (so familiar at this point that they don't even bother to have a character say "Will you turn that damn camera off??" or "Always film! We must film everything!!", because at this point the audience takes it as read) actually help remove some of the fear, because seeing everything through the camera lens confirms the reality of things for the viewer that the characters cannot be sure aren't hallucinations. The conceit confirms the objective existence of what is show, so the filmmakers can't play games with the audience's perceptions, show things from the perspective of a hallucinating character, etc.But, you know, I'm reluctant to give this film a low rating, because until it ended with the solidly disappointing dual thuds of both an overly familiar cliché of a conclusion and the unsatisfying failure to provide any explanation for what has been seen, I actually did enjoy it, despite the overwhelming sense of familiarity that hung over the whole project. The characters, though not well developed, were sort of likable; I've hung out with this class of listless obliterati myself at times, and enjoyed it thoroughly. So it rang true on that level. Also, after taking a little while to get going, the pacing is actually pretty good, tension builds and is maintained well, although I would suggest to the filmmakers that some development, in terms of revealing what's actually happening rather than just throwing more and more random creepy things in front of the camera for no apparent reason, might have actually made it more tense and effective.If this crew makes another horror feature, I'll watch it. But they need to get it right next time, keep the fun & scares but improve the storytelling and avoid filmmaking clichés, or I doubt I'd be interested to give them any more chances.
davidm-14
Found footage indie film about a town, Midground, which is about to be beset by a tsunami. A group of young people are messing around with drugs during and after the disaster, and, as strange events start happening, they begin to question what's real and what isn't. Everything seems to be filmed on phones, so it may cause a little motion sickness.The use of real disaster footage is interspersed and helps to bring some realism to the beginning of the story.The acting isn't bad, and as with most found footage movies, the minimal lighting is used to a creepy effect.
