BlazeLime
Strong and Moving!
Married Baby
Just intense enough to provide a much-needed diversion, just lightweight enough to make you forget about it soon after it’s over. It’s not exactly “good,” per se, but it does what it sets out to do in terms of putting us on edge, which makes it … successful?
Edwin
The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.
Cody
One of the best movies of the year! Incredible from the beginning to the end.
markdunlop
A remarkable realistic portrayal of the life of St. Peter by the brilliant actor Omar Sharif. Also follows the conversion and ministry of St. Paul. Recounting well the struggles and trials of early Christians in the Roman Empire. The film takes one from the crucifixion of Jesus Christ to the execution of St. Paul and eventual crucifixion of St. Peter. Exceptionally well directed and acted by all characters. Sharif is convert to Islam from having been raised a Coptic Christian. One may only speculate how this deeply moving Christian role has affected him personally. Sadly, some intolerant Muslims are calling for his death for appearing in this religious role. Highly recommended film for people of all faiths and persuasions.
Movie Watcher
This movie was not a good adaptation but it was the effort that counted. Why don't they get actual Jews to these movies? There were a lot of important pieces that should have been here. I know that time was an issue, but some events should have been included. The actions or events that Peter witnessed should have been included. The exact portrayal of how Cornelius and his family was saved was inaccurate in this movie. John the Baptist and the Apostles did full submersions according to the Jewish ritual for cleanliness, but this movie did what some Roman do which is baptize by sprinkling. Any movie that is made to honor the Lord should be close to scripture so that if non-believers see it, they can get a sense of what the Bible speaks.
tjbrown527
I gave this 1 star...and the real Apostle Peter would have no doubt given it none. It was rarely faithful to the Book of Acts in any specifics, more than not going of on wild tangents.My wife rented this from netflix. The description said it was made for Italian TV, but I didn't do the math...this would appear to be a Roman Catholic based film. Portraying Peter as the "rock" that the Church was built on, mechanical repetition of the Lord's Prayer, the constant recital of the Sermon on the Mount and not the Gospel (which is what was done in Acts).The lip syncing bothered me as did some of the acting and editing, but the content is what really bothers me. As has been mentioned before, this really went wacko when they got to Rome.If this were a BIBLICALLY ACCURATE movie, I could easily sit for three hours, but this was a waste of time.If you want an accurate portrayal of the Apostles, get the Acts series from "The Visual Bible".This was basically a ride through fantasyland.
mtr0118
After seeing the 1981 made for TV film PETER AND PAUL, I wondered if any one could match or remake the story of early Christianity as adequately as SAINT PETER. Omar Sharif wasn't as bad as Peter like in the other biblical films he was been in in recent years. Johannes Brandhupp's Christ was OK after a fine performance in the resurrection scenes.The background and music was great.They should of shown a little bit more about Peter's relationship with Jesus much before his crucifixion.If you liked this film, you should watch PAUL THE APOSTLE and also THE APOCALPYSIS(Richard Harris). RAI LUX-VIDE really knows how to do biblicals.