Wordiezett So much average

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Paynbob It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

guitarplayinglegend He likes unicorns, hes never driven a stick, and hes super fast! He can't run forever because detective Johnson is on the case and hes going to lube up with ridiculous amounts of baby oil. I loved this movie. Had me laughing from the beginning until the end. The way they make a mockery out of every movie in the franchise and the actors behind it was done brilliantly. I don't think it could have come at a better time either because so many of these Fast & Furious movies have been made that it is starting to get old. It was time to make fun of the series and Superfast hits the nail on the head. I enjoyed it. Needed a laugh and the movie delivered. Fans of the older movies will appreciate it I think.

Andrew Gold I try to give Friedberg and Seltzer the benefit of the doubt. I'm a sucker for a good spoof movie and these guys HAVE put out some good ones in the past. I got enjoyment from the first four Scary Movies. Yes, even 4 had its moments. By this point though it's obvious that the duo of filmmakers are just beating a dead horse. They played their hand and have nothing left to show - Superfast! is just another nail in their already-laid-out coffin.Against my better judgement I've seen almost every spoof these guys have done. If you know anything about the directors then you should know what you're getting yourself into with this movie. I had no expectations, and the movie still managed to disappoint. It's certainly not the worst movie they've done - it's a step up from the utter sh*tpile known as The Starving Games and certainly more watchable than Disaster Movie, Vampires Suck, and Meet the Spartans. The problem is that this movie had potential. It really did. Superfast! acts as a spoof not only of the Fast & Furious franchise but of action movie clichés in general. The jokes that can come from that are endless, and the beginning of the movie gave a few chuckles and showed a hint of promise. But as the movie goes on it becomes more and more clear that these spoofers think toilet jokes and cheap gross-out gags are funnier than genuine satire.I'll give credit where credit is due: The casting in this movie was good. Especially the Vin Diesel caricature and the cartel kingpin. It looked like the actors were having fun and doing the best they could do with the material they had. It's unfortunate that their talents were wasted here because they definitely have a sense of good comedic timing and decent acting chops in general. That's about as far as the positives go. The awkward "humor" is just cringeworthy and uncomfortable. The toilet humor got old decades ago. A good amount of these jokes wouldn't go by well in an Elementary School let alone on the big screen. Superfast! is filled to the brim with moments that leave you thinking, who in the hell thought that was funny? Who thought making this film would be a good idea? And most importantly, why are these talentless hacks still making movies?

Martin Solhaug Standal I am a big fan of parodies, and those movies that got the so called "Dick and butt" humor. This movie is just like all weird movies that should have its own genre, so that people that are not that in to weird movies like "american pie" and "van the man" can look somewhere else. All in all with all the great puns, and the throw backs from the real fast and furious movie. I love how they get characters that look and act like the characters in the fast and furious. When i say that they act like them, i mean over acting, the police man is expressing that he is using really tight t-shirts, and lubricates himself in baby oil. When it comes to special effects and acting it is like in any "weird" movie, poorly done. This kinda gives me the felling that i am watching my kinda movie. Spoiler alert: When the bike in a police Chase hits a tree it flames up into a explosion, that is really poorly done.But even though its kinda weird movie and poorly edited, i love it. I knew from the start that the movie would be like that because of the cover. So if you are like me, likes weird movies With great puns and throw backs, i think this is the movie you are looking for.Note: I am Norwagian so i don't have the best English in the world, so pleas don't judge, thank you.

Gino Cox Friedberg and Seltzer have carved a niche writing and directing guilty pleasures – parodies of films and genres that audiences seem to enjoy and that earn money, but which attract scathing reviews by self-important critics who consider themselves guardians of public cinematic tastes and standards. At $20MM, "Superfast!" isn't exactly low-budget, except compared with the $190MM budget for "Furious 7." Much of the humor is low-brow, although perhaps not as low-brow as some of the humor in "Airplane!" It's more polished than typical direct-to-video fare, but lacks the polish of major theatrical releases. Compared with "Airplane!" the plot is more cohesive and less episodic, but that's a mixed blessing – some of the funniest bits in "Airplane!" (black coffee, pedophile pilot, wrong day to quit) didn't really propel the plot. The filmmakers cast relatively unknown actors who resemble the Fast & Furious actors they parody, remarkably well in some cases. The actors generally do an excellent job, even when given silly things to do and things to say. They seem committed to their roles and never wink at the camera. The movie is a series of ridiculous gags. It lacks subtlety. Character development is nonexistent. Transitions are nonsensical. Some of the jokes seem forced, while others aren't very funny. But a lot of the jokes work. Overall, the movie is hilarious. The jokes are cheap, unsophisticated, sophomoric and juvenile, but there are a lot of them. Perhaps too many of the characters are doofuses. Much of the humor seems deliberately constrained to target a teenage audience – they avoid raunchy jokes and one scene involving nudity is extensively blurred out when a Mike Myers/Austin Powers approach might have been much funnier. And much of the humor relies upon ridiculing the F&F franchise's ridiculous elements.The film makes no effort to be cerebral and succeeds famously.