Surviving Picasso

1996 "Only his passion for women could rival his passion for painting."
6.3| 2h5m| R| en
Details

The passionate Merchant-Ivory drama tells the story of Francoise Gilot, the only lover of Pablo Picasso who was strong enough to withstand his ferocious cruelty and move on with her life.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Micransix Crappy film
Matrixiole Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.
Asad Almond A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.
Delight Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.
zdraveius Pablo Picass-, Spanish painter. 1943 in Paris occupied by German troops in the whole world speaks English. How much illiteracy in America be if all movies, regardless of location or origin of the action characters are spoken in English? What are Americans, anyway? A lot of people of all nation, close to everywhere, most of them without school, without education. A brief history of the nation and without anything special. Generations do not know how to write or read, not many know that there is anything outside of America and English. And yet, the rest of humanity is always reported in America. Worryingly decadent. If any director even accidentally sees these lines, he may contact Mel Gibson on his congratulations on his films spoken in a language other than English.
humanitieshallhouse Although not mentioned in the IMDb profile, this film was also based on artist Francoise Gilot's work entitled, "Life with Picasso". In an interview with Charlie Rose, Gilot emphasized that her book's title came from the French "vivre" meaning to live or life in general, rather than the possessive "My Life". In interview, Gilot likened herself to a camera taking in the life around them.Having said this, it must be understood that the screenplay was not written as a documentary on the artistic process, which is why it does not focus on the individual paintings or the techniques of Picasso, Gilot, Matisse or Braque, all of whom are noted masters of twentieth century art. Rather it is an important film for other reasons, as a character study as artist as a whole which a less insightful or sensitive observer might mistake for tedium or sentimentality. But even more significant is the film's revelation of the importance of autonomy and benevolence in the life of an artist.
SnoopyStyle It's 1943 Paris. Pablo Picasso (Anthony Hopkins) is selling paintings to the Nazis and being the famed artist. Françoise Gilot (Natascha McElhone) meets him as an admirer and becomes his long-time mistress. It's turbulent affair and she would have two kids with him. Her grandmother (Joan Plowright) warns her. The other women in his life includes his bitter wife Olga, Dora Maar (Julianne Moore), and Marie-Thérèse who has a daughter with him.This is the wrong subject for Merchant Ivory. Their safe harbor is mannered people trying to restrain their inner turmoil. Picasso's turmoil is not interior. It is exterior. This movie needs flamboyance. Picasso is excessive in every ways. This contrast completely with the reserved nature of a Merchant Ivory movies. Hopkins has the acting power but the movie struggles to harness that power.
Peter Hayes When you have Antony Hopkins in the lead of a movie you maybe expect too much - especially as he looks so much like the real Picasso on the film poster. Sadly the promise is not fulfilled as we learn nothing; and worse the low budget limits where the camera can wander - or maybe too much was spent on getting lead Hopkins?The film is tied to a very minor version of his life story, and worse, the estate having pulled-down-the-shutters on the project - leaving us with only half completed sketches and cod paintings from which we are supposed to get the gist of the maestro.Although well enough done to give us an insight in to style and purpose we are getting short changed, like a Beatles bio-film where the actors don't sing real Lennon and McCartney numbers but pastiche versions.Yes the artist took art forward, but his work is more imagination than technique. He was a factory artist (his slapdash ten minute wonders litter the wall of many of the new rich) and don't tell me all his work was good or original- a lot of samey-samey abstract pictures of women.The central problem is that Hopkins is a lovely person and Picasso was not. While on-the-ball when he plays the strong, manipulating and selfish man (these are on-tap devices for a real stage actor), he weakens when trying to be nice or light-hearted. His "let's still be friends" is too soft and reasonable for a man whose whole life was dedicated to self pleasure and self gratification. I don't believe he was ever nice in that English gentleman sense, only in that car salesman way of being nice to get what they want. The kind that turns nasty when rebuked.Female lead McElhone (playing Francoise Gilot) hasn't a clue what to do with her lover/student/child bearer character. It is a role of long face pulling, but at least she has a lovely long face to do it with. She either doesn't believe in her character or refuses to play weak, which she must have been to put up with what we see here. More a groupie than a student. Or maybe - more accurately - one of these honouree servants that only the rich and famous can have. Talented as an artist? - couldn't tell you from watching this film!This product is actually not that bad, but it was a story that wanted everything going for it to have a sporting chance of success. Having a class A actor in the lead doesn't make up for the faults of budget and access to the artist's real work. A bland piece of work that might have dashed any chance to make a proper fist of the job for a generation or two.