Bardlerx Strictly average movie

Protraph Lack of good storyline.

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

manlemaire I found this on internet, do you think it is her in this movie ? http://www.xvideos.com/video70552/Sex_in_car I found this on internet, do you think it is her in this movie ? http://www.xvideos.com/video70552/Sex_in_car I found this on internet, do you think it is her in this movie ? http://www.xvideos.com/video70552/Sex_in_car I found this on internet, do you think it is her in this movie ? http://www.xvideos.com/video70552/Sex_in_car I found this on internet, do you think it is her in this movie ? http://www.xvideos.com/video70552/Sex_in_car

slayrrr666 "Devil in the Flesh 2" is a really lackluster and disappointing sequel.**SPOILERS**After her affections are turned down, Debbie Strong, (Jodi Lyn O'Keefe) escapes from a mental asylum and goes on the run, managing to wind up at Holmby College and winds up falling for English Teacher Sam Deckner, (Jsu Garcia) the writer of a book she liked. Settling in, she finds out about his girlfriend Carla Briggs, (Katherine Kendall) and plots to get together with him. As she endears herself to the other students of the campus with her fiery appearance, a string of murders around the school has the local authorities baffled. When her attitude starts to rub off on others, who make fun of her for the crush she has on her teacher, she lashes out and begins to take out her frustrations on those who stand in the way of her obsession.The Good News: This here wasn't that bad at all. One of the film's biggest improvements over the first one is the fact that the body count is a lot bigger. Rather than a few deaths all at the end, this one puts in a couple here and there, really making the psycho seem a lot more ruthless than before. The kills are a little more brutal than before, further adding to the deranged feel of the killer. One is thrown a hair-dryer inside a shower and electrocuted, another has a wood with nails in it swung into the forehead, a syringe to the neck and a metal coil impaled in the back and coming out the front. In addition to the deaths, there's some slashings and stabbings, as well as a gunshot wound, really amp up the gore factor of the film. The only other part of the film that is above average is the final showdown, which has some really good stalking scenes utilizing some of the best suspense in the film. With the darkened hallways, noises and characters popping out of nowhere, it's one of the best scenes in the film, and aside from the kills, the reason to see this one.The Bad News: This here is a really troublesome film. One of the worst problems is that everything is exaggerated to the point of gleeful self-parody. The victim whose identity the heroine adopts doesn't just meet an untimely end, the sequence includes a part where she yells out a series of profanities, then she accidentally gasses herself with pepper spray and becomes impaled on a metal coil, all in one swift gesture. This is way too over-the-top for what could've been done in a way simpler motive rather than this. As it is, it looks like the victim is a brain-dead klutz who doesn't know how to work anything, and this is just too over-the-top to really be anything more than that. Similarly, she doesn't just corrupt her mousy roommate, she introduces her to drinking, Internet porn, manslaughter, and bi-curiosity, all in one eventful evening. This is all conducted a little too much. Had it been spread out over a little further over the time period of the film would've been more believable. The way it's presented here, it makes her seem way too sleazy and pushy for someone who we are supposed to be the heroine. The other big nagging problem with this one is that there is very little done that would propel the romance forward. There's a chance encounter in the parking lot, a book meeting and one class session, and this results in the hardcore crush in the film. This really should've used more events to build things up. This one really should've been the introduction and then built up the romance from that, only for this one to just use the above set-up to carry the romance and ensuing jealousy. There's also a couple of really useless scenes. One is a silly erotic dream scene that seems all the more gratuitous for the distracting obviousness of the fact that she has refused to take her clothes off. It's quite obvious this is occurring, and it really ruins what is happening in the moment. The events at the end to regain the upper-hand in the romance are excruciating to watch, and don't have any real value to be there. All in all, this is a very uninspired sequel.The Final Verdict: With a lot of problems and a couple of reasons for recommendations, this is a really lackluster sequel to a really weak original. This is really only recommended to those looking for some cheap sleaze or fans of the first one, otherwise this is a skip-able movie.Rated R: Graphic Language, Violence, Nudity and several mild sex scenes

MetalGeek I've never seen the first "Devil in the Flesh" but apparently viewership of the original is not a requirement for enjoying this made-for-video sequel. Jodi Lynn O'Keefe takes on the role of psychopathic teen "Debbie" played by Rose MacGowan in the first film, and part "2" (also known as "Teacher's Pet" apparently) is basically a college campus version of "Fatal Attraction." Our heroine (?) escapes from a mental hospital during the opening credits and then hitches a ride with a rich girl on her way to college to begin her freshman year. Through a plot contrivance too silly to describe here, Freshman Girl accidentally dies so "Debbie" takes her car and identity and enrolls in school in her place. She is placed with a computer nerd roommate in a dorm lorded over by a bull-dyke R.A. and eventually develops a crush on her hunky creative writing teacher. After a one night stand with said teacher, he rejects her, and "Debbie" goes ballistic, causing a decent amount of mayhem while trying to cover two bases: one, eliminating the roadblocks between her and lifelong happiness with her professor, and two: trying to keep everyone from finding out that she's not really who she says she is. The main reason for watching this movie is the absolutely STUNNING Jodi Lynn O'Keefe, who looks fantastic slinking around in skin tight outfits and who can pull off both the sweetness and b*tchiness required of a person with a double life. It's not the best movie I've ever seen, but it's certainly not the worst either. Worth a rental even if you've never seen the original "D.I.T.F." Did I mention that Jodi Lynn O'Keefe is hot? in case you missed it, Jodi Lynn O'Keefe is hot.

ebert_jr Jodi Lyn O'Keefe sits squarely in the "can't live without 'em" part of the "can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em" equation. Beautiful, starry-eyed and definite Siren, O'Keefe dances around the plot of "Teacher's Pet" (written, no doubt, on a few sheets of toilet paper) and, I'm sure, leaving every male viewer glued to the edge of their seat in the process. Oh yeah, she can act. No, really...she puts out a terse, tightly wound performance that yields a believable "psycho chic" in love with teacher. The fact that this is still noticeable even after your neck hurts from following the outline of her rather supple leather skirt wrapped bottom says loads about that skill level. Hmm, and I see Jodi's a fellow New Joiseyian. I knew there was at least something good about this state!In a phrase: You go girl!