Cathardincu
Surprisingly incoherent and boring
WasAnnon
Slow pace in the most part of the movie.
Brennan Camacho
Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.
Quiet Muffin
This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.
knightchip
This is a story of hope and unity; both these things are found through the game of rugby in South Africa in 1995. In the previous year, 1994, blacks in South Africa were give the right to vote and they voted into office, Nelson Mandela as president. President Mandala was the countries first black president and he understood the need for unity within the country. What good would come of giving black's the right to vote and in electing South Africa's first black President if the country remained divided by race? President Mandela understood the opportunity presented to him in 1995 as South Africa hosted the World Cup. The Springbok's were South Africa's rugby team. Most American's know little about rugby and the World Cup. I know so little about the game I needed to consult Wikipedia for my questions. The World Cup is a sports competition held every four years and a different country hosts the World Cup every four years.Greatness has a sense of timing. With the worlds attention on both South Africa and the World Cup being held in South Africa the Springbok's played a significant role in 1995 World Cup. This is one of the best documentaries I've ever seen. It's one of those documentaries that makes you feel good about the Human Race. I highly recommend this documentary!
MartinHafer
If you've seen the film "Invictus" you really don't need to see "The 16th Man" or vice-versa. This is because both cover the same material--and both do it very well. And, both star Morgan Freeman (as he narrates "The 16th Man" and starred as Nelson Mandela in "Invictus"). Since I love South Africa and have spent quit a bit of time there, I enjoyed seeing both but the more casual viewer probably needn't see both!The film is about the famous 1995 international rugby competition held in South Africa--the first since Apartheid ended. But the film is about much more than the game--but about how this event helped to unify the nation and create a sense of brotherhood between the races and what Mandela's part was in all this. It's extremely inspirational and well worth seeing. In fact, my non-sports loving family members also seemed to enjoy this one because it was well made and the story so emotionally charged.
Michael_Elliott
30 for 30: The 16th Man (2010) *** 1/2 (out of 4)Emotionally charging documentary cover the political and racial climate in South Africa after the release of Nelson Mandela and how much of the racial tension took a back seat to the rugby team that would end up winning the World Cup. Of all the entries in the ESPN series this one here features some of the most recent events so I'm sure many will already know the story of this. The story was also told by Clint Eastwood in INVICTUS, which also had Freeman playing Mandela. Even though the story is very familiar that doesn't take anything away from the film because it does such a good job at telling different sides of the story you can't help but get caught up in the message and especially the outcome. We get to hear from white folks who hated black and had never even spoke with them. We hear from blacks who hated whites and wanted to kill them. Both sides explain the causes for their hatred and then we get to hear about Mandela and why he felt this team was what the country needed. The movie does a great job at really getting to know the players, the location and all the events that were going on during that time. The actual sporting events get footage played but what keeps this film going the best are the actual interviews with all the people who played in the game. Seeing how emotional they still are was quite touching and is what made this film stick out so well.
