Plantiana
Yawn. Poorly Filmed Snooze Fest.
NekoHomey
Purely Joyful Movie!
Helloturia
I have absolutely never seen anything like this movie before. You have to see this movie.
Wyatt
There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.
TheLittleSongbird
Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors. From his Essanay period after leaving Keystone, 'A Night Out' is not one of his very best or even among the best of this particular period. It shows a noticeable step up in quality though from his Keystone period, where he was still evolving and in the infancy of his long career, from 1914, The Essanay period is something of Chaplin's adolescence period where his style had been found and starting to settle. 'The Champion' is among the best of his early work and for me it is the first great Chaplin and perhaps something of a turning point for him.Certainly other efforts of his have more pathos and a balance of that and the comedy than 'The Champion'. On the other hand, 'The Champion' looks pretty good, not incredible but it was obvious that Chaplin was taking more time with his work and not churning out countless shorts in the same year of very variable success like he did with Keystone. Appreciate the importance of his Keystone period and there is some good stuff he did there, but the more mature and careful quality seen here and later on is obvious here and preference.'The Champion' is one of his funniest from the Essanay period and the first effort of his to be more than amusing. The boxing match is one of the best sequences from anything in the early part of Chaplin's career. It moves quickly and there is a more discernible and busier story to usual, even if at times it could have had more variety.Chaplin directs more than competently, if not quite cinematic genius standard yet. He also, as usual, gives an amusing and expressive performance and at clear ease with the physicality of the role. The supporting cast acquit themselves well, with a charming Edna Purviance. Summing up, surprisingly great. 9/10 Bethany Cox
Tom Gooderson-A'Court
Chaplin's third Essanay picture and he finally appears to have found his feet with the new studio. Chaplin's tramp, destitute and famished spots a sign offering money to act as a sparring partner. He watches as three men go in before him and return battered and bruised. Chaplin however has a trick up his sleeve or rather in his glove; a lucky horseshoe, which he uses to knock out his larger, more adept opponent. Spotting his potential a trainer prepares the slight Chaplin for a big fight against the champion Bob Uppercut (Bud Jamison) but Chaplin has other things on his mind, namely the trainer's daughter Edna Purviance.I was so glad that this film was good. I was really disappointed with Chaplin's first two Essanay films His New Job and A Night Out. This is a real return to form. The idea was actually taken from a Fred Karno sketch that Chaplin performed before entering the movie industry. Perhaps one of the reasons for the film's success is that Chaplin knew what he was doing before he went in rather than partially making it up as he went along.The film really shows its age with its inter-titles. There wasn't one occasion where I understood every word! But you have to remember that this film is 97 years old and language changes. Another thing that changes is people's attitudes and sensibilities towards kissing. It's hard to believe now but Hollywood once enforced a self censorship ruling that meant that no on screen kiss could last more than a couple of seconds. Although made in pre-code Hollywood, Chaplin got round this type of censorship by having his Tramp kiss Edna from behind a large beer bottle. It's a clever device that works around censorship.The film is much slower and more measured than much of Chaplin's other work of the period and especially the work of Keystone. The opening scene in which Chaplin shares a hot dog with his equally starving dog is both very sweet and very slow and reminiscent of his later work. It's a complete opposite of his previous Keystone films.The highlight of the film is undoubtedly the boxing. Watching Chaplin train in his trademark bowler hat is brilliant and the big fight itself is hilarious and extremely well choreographed. Chaplin and Jamison spend half the fight either falling over or in embraces, punching themselves in the face and the umpire obviously gets a few punches thrown his way too. Raging Bull this is not. You have to feel that the film is a precursor to Chaplin's massively successful City Lights which features his famous boxing scene. Another highlight is the fantastic makeup and over the top fake facial hair of the film's villain Leo White, a motif of Chaplin's early work. Without dialogue you are still always sure who the bad guy is with his deep dark eyes, pale face and enormous moustache.This film is not up there with Chaplin's later work but shows great potential. It is a marked improvement on his earlier Essanay films and introduced a lot of action into his repertoire.www.attheback.blogspot.com
CitizenCaine
Chaplin was certainly the champion of silent films and was rapidly becoming well known in early 1915 when he edited, wrote, directed, and starred in The Champion. Chaplin plays a hapless guy with a dog, who still retains its dignity even in desperate straits. Chaplin seasons the stubborn dog's sausage; otherwise, it appears the dog refuses to eat. They happen upon a local fighter needing a sparring partner where Chaplin gets the brilliant idea of utilizing a horseshoe in his boxing glove in order to even the odds. Chaplin becomes invincible and later secures a match with a champion. The championship boxing match predates the one in City Lights by over 15 years, but Chaplin is magnificent dancing around the ring as the champ tries in vain to put him away. The referee takes as much of a beating as the fighters in the ring. This is pure slapstick fun with just enough plot to balance the film, unlike most other Chaplin films up to this time. Edna Purviance is Chaplin's love interest in their second film together. Ben Turpin appears as an obnoxious vendor. The silent screen giant of westerns Bronco Billy Anderson is the enthusiastic man in the audience. Warner Brothers director of 1930's and 1940's films Lloyd Bacon appears as one of the sparring partners. **1/2 of 4 stars.
The_Movie_Cat
In 1915 Chaplin produced fourteen films for Essanay, just over a third of his output for the previous year under the conveyor belt-like production values of Keystone. This was a trend that would continue, with Chaplin's quantity shrinking more and more each year until the two-features-a-decade of his final years. However, with this shrink in output, the quality would increase, with massive advancement in the artistry of his work.This said, the Essanay shorts, while more inventive, better plotted and better realised than the Keystone work, initially aren't all that better. A case in point is The Champion, still a relatively primitive piece that has no great meaning or comedic punch (pun unintended). It's worth remembering that this was still only twenty years since the emergence of the first extensive film productions, and that it would have been sophisticated in its day. Yet despite this, the lack of continuity between internal/external locations and lapses of plot logic (Chaplin's Tramp becomes a feared boxer because he has a horseshoe in his glove
later he is able to perform the same feats of knock out artistry without the horseshoe, which makes no sense at all) do pall somewhat.Probably most notable for inspiring a sequence in "City Lights", this is still the era of large comedy moustaches and lack of screen realism. While comedy can be exaggerated, with nothing to ground it in any form of reality it has no great currency over 90 years on. Thankfully the Essanay shorts began, most notably from "The Tramp" on, to develop Chaplin's character as a more sympathetic and socially relevant persona; the seeds of which can be seen here, with a more likable take than Chaplin had previously indulged in. Charlie himself resented the working practises of Essanay, claiming in his autobiography that the company was "smug and self-satisfied" and that "their last consideration was the making of good pictures." In all, The Champion is interesting as a historical document and notable for the rapid progression Chaplin was making. On its own terms though, it isn't terribly good.