Interesteg What makes it different from others?

Teringer An Exercise In Nonsense

Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

Salubfoto It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

riff-18 Other reviews make out this is a very poor movie. It is actually not bad at all, especially for late night viewing. From the outset people are trapped in a confined place with something bad living there. The acting is OK and the setting did not need a billion dollars spent on it to get the ambiance right. The only downside is the gore moments are not clearly seen which saves on special effects costs i guess (just use your imagination instead). The best thing about the movie is you never really know whats going to happen next which is a refreshing change from many films today. Kind of like watching the original zombie movies way back in time where you had no way of knowing what the weird thing is capable of next. There are some twists along the way too.

doktardemento OK, first off I want to say that this is super low budget, schlocky, and by no means a master work. That being said, its fun, freaky, and reads like someone took the best of the worst of 4chan, locked them in a brick factory with a homicidal Jesus freak and his pet mutant, and recorded the results. Sure its not necessarily anything new; but then again I haven't seen anything quite like it before either. If you like Troma films you will worship this. If your a pretentious film dork you will turn your nose up at this but thats OK, we don't want you anyways.The characters are a bit 2d, totally trashy, and like in most horror movies they get their just desserts. The overtones of religious insanity are fairly creepy and bizarre, although not anything that really grabs you. The main characters story is way too horribly possibly, at least up to the point of her creating a new persona to make it the Bloodletting. All in all though, it was fun and its nice to see people breaking out and doing something off the studio grid.

maryh205 This film was a real let down for me. First of all I liked the first Death Factory. It was fun, exciting and cheesy in a good way. I like cheese, not just in my food :) First of all there was NO Tiffany Shepis! How can you have her play the main villainess (Alexa) in part 1 but have her M.I.A. in part 2? This seemed like a "let's make a quick buck" flick. The first film had heart and you could tell. This one just seemed like a bunch of people getting together to capitalize on the originality, flavor and courageousness of the first flick. I'm sure some people will like it, especially if they have never seen the first, but if you go in thinking this is an actual sequel you will be greatly disappointed. No Tiffany Shepis? At least Terror Toons 1 & 2 was made by the same people and was somewhat linear. Brain Damage Films put this out so if you're familiar with them you definitely know what your going to get when you hear that gravelly: "Welcome Gorehounds." At least the Terror Toons series was entertaining.

HumanoidOfFlesh "Death Factory" by Brad Sykes is a cheesy gore flick which heavily relies on tired clichés.In its sequel six degenerates are invited to the abandoned factory to witness the killing of an innocent,only to discover they were lured there by religious nut Denny who supplies the victims for his sister Alexa,who was turned into a flesh-eating monster as the result of a chemical experiment turned wrong.Ana tries to find the individual who was responsible for killing her daughter and is invited among the fresh meat."Death Factory:Bloodletting" is a little bit better than its predecessor.The film provides some ghastly gore,but almost all the characters are uninteresting.The script is generic and offers nothing new.At least Claudia Vargas is pretty believable as Ana,not to mention very sexy.6 out of 10.