Nonureva Really Surprised!

Btexxamar I like Black Panther, but I didn't like this movie.

Steineded How sad is this?

MonsterPerfect Good idea lost in the noise

adonis98-743-186503 The story of the famous and influential 1960s rock band The Doors and its lead singer and composer, Jim Morrison, from his days as a UCLA film student in Los Angeles, to his untimely death in Paris, France at age 27 in 1971. I never understood the love for Oliver Stone's The Doors cause except Val Kilmer's perfomance as Jim Morrison which was quite good for it's time this movie was packed more with drugs rather than singing or a good plot in general. The direction was also rather weak as well and Kilmer and Meg Ryan deserved better than a half baked biography, music, drama that was just boring and dull as it kept going and going i was just bored out of my mind. (3.0/10)

Sam Smith Being a huge Doors fan for as long as I can remember I put off seeing this film for a very long time. After finally caving in I watched this film with low expectations of watching an inaccurate portrayal of The Doors performed poorly by highly paid actors and actresses. I still feel I was king of correct. However the performance from Val Kilmer saves this film being a complete write off for me.From spending years listening to The Doors, watching interviews and just generally studying everything about The Doors from many different sources. I conclude this film is in fact quite inaccurate in terms of the behaviour and some events portrayed. Although I can understand the truth may need to be stretched in some cases in order to entertain the film goer. Annoyingly this infuriates Doors fans it still seems to get across the general feel of The Doors and creates the overall impression of what I think they actually were like and I was very intrigued by this film for many reasons.Whilst I harshly disagree with the portrayal of The Doors I still think that the films many great aspects were not from the narrative itself. The cinematography in particular caught my eye, loads of sloppy hand held shots and shaky moments particularly during Jim's drunk and high scenes. I believe this was a great attempt in showing the lack of care and general out of the ordinary presence of Jim giving the viewer that intoxicated sense Jim was shown in. The cave scene where Jim dropped acid I believe correctly gave the audience the true sighting of Jim Morrison through the use of his freedom and just open mindedness to every little thing showing the true side of his unbelievably intelligent creative mind. The shots is this scene were almost perfect just showing madness and just a different world through Jim's eyes. On the other hand I believe if Jim was to make a film about himself the visual aspects would play a much bigger role for example really concentrating on the psychedelic high he would always like to be influenced by, I imagine an early Terence Mallick film just solely showing incredible shots of astonishing landscapes or beautifully colourful establishing shots, truly capturing the vision Jim tries to put through his poetry using the clear imagery.Another huge bonus for this film was the performance of Val Kilmer. Spending years picking up small personality traits Jim Morrison possess through interviews and videos of him, I believed no actor would be able to put these in place or even look like Jim does. Val Kilmer managed to play a staggeringly convincing role that clearly shows the hard work he may have put in to achieve this. Previously seeing Val Kilmer in other films I thought there's not a chance he could look like Jim, amazingly I was wrong the appearance in face, hair and clothing was spot on, now his personal traits. Val clearly spent time studying Jim the sense of being careless and having total freedom with no consequences was clearly shown through Vals attempt also the singing was a fantastic effort, although was noticeably different on a few occasions I believe Stones use of Jim's voice for long shots and Vals voice for close ups can make you genuinely question who is singing in some parts. The performance really does play a huge part in making this film as interesting as it is.Withal I feel this film was inaccurate in certain aspects of The Doors' career, which is of course aggravating being a huge Doors fan. This film still intrigued me in the fact it gave off a strong sense of The Doors and clearly shows the creativity they possess which is important to just open the eyes to everyone that hasn't heard of The Doors. Overall was quite pleased with this film I understand it is always going to be a difficult film to create. Learn to forget.

SnoopyStyle It's 1965 L.A. Jim Morrison (Val Kilmer), UCLA film student, meets Pam Courson (Meg Ryan). He quits school and forms The Doors with Ray Manzarek (Kyle MacLachlan), John Densmore (Kevin Dillon), and Robby Krieger (Frank Whaley). They become one of the foremost counter culture rock banks of the era. The band drifts apart as Jim travels a different path with witchy journalist Patricia Kennealy (Kathleen Quinlan). In 1970, he faces charges for exposing himself during a Miami concert. He's living with Pam when he dies in Paris at age 27 in 1971.Director Oliver Stone delivers a solid biopic with his cinematic style to depict the drugged out hippie time and the chaotic nature of the band. Val Kilmer delivers his most impressive performance of his career. The movie could probably add some drama but I'm not sure how exactly. The world is burning down and he's a part of the chaos. His end is predictable for fans and newcomers alike. There may be a dramatic story in there somewhere.

Dom Roder I didn't think rocksploitation was an actual genre until I saw this film - has all the "rock star" clichés and little else. Too long and not enough events occur - it's like a long jam session of Light My Fire interrupted by a few events. Stone could've cut an hour of the film and nothing will be missed.If you want a realistic depiction of the Doors, this is not the place. If you want an enjoyable film about a rock band, this is not the place.I wouldn't recommend watching this film as entertainment, but if anyone is considering making a rock film, they should watch this first as a "What not to do" guide. If someone wants to make a movie about a rock star with substance abuse problems and nothing else, then it's already been done before. It's called "The Doors."That's all the value I see from this movie - a lesson for others to avoid the mistakes that were done here.