The Fixer

1968 "They accused him… They beat him… They condemned him… and after all that, they were more afraid of him than ever."
6.8| 2h12m| en
Details

Set in tsarist Russia around the turn of the century and based on a true story of a Russian Jewish peasant Yakov Bog who was wrongly imprisoned for a most unlikely crime - the “ritual murder” of a Gentile child in Kiev. We witness the unrelenting detail of the peasant handyman's life in prison and see him gain in dignity as the efforts to humiliate him and make him confess fail.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

LastingAware The greatest movie ever!
Roy Hart If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.
Edison Witt The first must-see film of the year.
Alistair Olson After playing with our expectations, this turns out to be a very different sort of film.
James Hitchcock The "fixer" of the title is Yakov Bok, a Jewish handyman living in the Ukrainian city of Kiev. The film is set in the early twentieth century when that city still formed part of the Russian Empire. This was the period of the anti-Semitic persecutions known as pogroms, one of which is vividly depicted in the opening scenes.Bok's life is changed when he saves the life of a wealthy gentile. This man wants to reward Bok for this deed, but Bok, knowing him to be a virulent anti-Semite, claims the reward under a false name, implying that he is a gentile himself. The man uses his influence to put lucrative work Bok's way, but Bok is then wrongly accused of rape by his patron's daughter Zinaida. Upon examination the charge is found to be false, but the investigations have revealed Bok's Jewish background and brought him to the attention of the authorities. He is arrested again, this time on trumped-up charges of murdering a Christian boy in an example of an anti-Semitic "blood libel".The plot has similarities with those of earlier films set in the American Deep South such as "Intruder in the Dust" and "To Kill a Mockingbird". At a time of racial tensions, a member of a racial minority is accused of a serious crime against a member of the majority community. The accused man is defended by a liberal lawyer who tries desperately to ensure that his client receives a fair trial, but this proves impossible given the prevailing atmosphere of prejudice. This plot was later used as the basis of David Guterson's novel "Snow Falling on Cedars" and of its film adaptation, which dealt with anti-Japanese feeling in the Pacific North-West following the attack on Pearl Harbor. The liberal lawyer in "The Fixer" is Bibikov, the examining magistrate who investigated the alleged rape of Zinaida and who realises that Bok has become the victim of a plot by the authorities. Bibikov's efforts succeed in making the case an international cause celebre; the authorities respond by torturing Bok in an attempt to get him to confess.Surprisingly, this film brought Alan Bates, who plays Bok, his only Oscar nomination. I say "surprisingly" because, although Bates is good here, the film as a whole is inferior to several others in which he gave performances that were as good or better, such as "Whistle Down the Wind", "Far from the Madding Crowd" and "The Go-Between". Perhaps the reason is that "The Fixer" is one of his relatively few American films; most of his best films were made in Britain, and hence tended to be overlooked by the Academy.Bok is a rationalist who has no interest in practising Judaism or any other religion, yet he is hated by the anti-Semites as much as any religiously observant Jew. (There are, however, limits to Bok's secularism. Zinaida's false accusation comes after she has failed to seduce him because he will not breach the Jewish religious taboo against having sex with a menstruating woman). This raises some interesting questions about Jewish identity. "What does it mean to be a 'secular Jew'", and "How is Jewishness defined?".The controversial suggestion is made in the film that a Jewish racial identity (as opposed to a Jewish religious identity) may be a definition forced onto people from outside, a creation of the anti-Semites themselves. The film also (and equally controversially) suggests that ant-Semitism may itself be an artificial creation, something deliberately fomented by the powers that be in order to focus popular discontent on something other than the powers that be themselves. This was at one time a widely-held view on the Left (versions of it can be found in Brecht's "Die Rundeköpfe und die Spitzköpfe" and Chaplin's "The Great Dictator") but it has become less prevalent since 1945. The ferocity of the Nazi persecution of the Jews suggests that anti-Semitism is not only more prevalent in European society but also a more complex problem than was once thought.The film was directed by John Frankenheimer who in the sixties was noted for directing films with a liberal political slant, mostly starring Burt Lancaster, such as "The Birdman of Alcatraz". The screenplay was written by Dalton Trumbo, who was known for his Communist sympathies. The film, however, is not as overtly left-wing as one might expect from that particular combination. It certainly savages Tsarism, but in the sixties few Americans really worried themselves about the pros and cons of a regime that had been overthrown some fifty years earlier. For the most part it contents itself with preaching not a specifically leftist message but a sermon about man's inhumanity to man.Now there have been many good films made on that subject, and a few great ones. (Trumbo even wrote the script for one of the great ones, Kubrick's "Spartacus"). "The Fixer", however, is certainly not a great film, and in my opinion not even a very good one. The first part is certainly interesting, and Bates receives good support from another British actor, Dirk Bogarde, as Bibikov. The film, however, is overlong, and the latter part is disappointing, especially after Bibikov is found mysteriously hanged. (One presumes he has been murdered by the authorities to silence him, but this is never made explicit). Towards the end it slides into mysticism, with Bok being visited in his cell by a vision of the Tsar himself. Trumbo seems to lose interest in Bok as an individual, presenting him as a generalised symbol of humanity, even (despite his atheism) as a Christ-figure. What began as an interesting film ends as a preachy, sententious one, worthy but wordy. 5/10
materialgeeza I came home from work after working a 24 hour shift and turned on the TV to find something mindless to numb my brain (ready to do the same thing tomorrow), and turned on this film, I had to watch it to the end. The story is simple enough, its the tale of someone who is wrongly accused of a crime in order to satisfy someones higher political manifesto but there's an ageless quality to it. I'm not particularly clued up on films or politics, and certainly not a critic but I have to say that in these times of arrest without trial or evidence, this film strikes a chord. This film highlights some of the best and worst aspects inherent to human nature, a truly remarkable work.
wonga66 A real Oscar winning performance by Bates.Beats me why he didn't get it!The whole story portrays the times in Russia so well with anti- semitisem as a way to keep away attention from the failings of the Csar and his evil government. A unique actor who really feels his part as can be told by Bates eyes which reflect that his soul is part of what he his doing unlike todays mimik actors.
Jugu Abraham It is not often that cinema can do justice to a great novel. This one brings out the existential questions of the lead character Yakov Blok in an honest manner, true to the original. I think I would place the credit more with screenplaywriter Dalton Trumbo for this effort. He did not even change some of the key lines of the book. I wonder what Malamud would have thought of the script.Frankenheimer needs praise in some sequences, the prison sequences and the seduction sequence--but what amuses me no end is why he chose to cast the three actresses who speak their lines with no care for even a semblance of being East European. Alan Bates, Dirk Bogarde, Hugh Griffith, David Warner and Ian Holm are all good actors but Frankenheimer made no effort to make them speak like Russians or East Europeans. Bogarde is predictable in his role, but Alan Bates carried the film. He alone played his role with conviction. Maurice Jarre's music was good but not his best.Like "Gandhi" this film will be remembered because of the subject, not because of its cinema. The true hero was not Bates, not Trumbo, not Frankenheimer--it was Malamud!