Rijndri Load of rubbish!!

Rpgcatech Disapointment

Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

Staci Frederick Blistering performances.

Wizard-8 Italian director Antonio Margheriti is better known these days for the schlock he directed in the 1970s and 1980s, but with this early effort of his, he was working on a higher class project. Clearly having a lavish budget (at least by European standards of the time), Margheriti does manage to make this particular movie look quite good. The sets, props, desert backdrops, and some of the special effects are pretty decent. However, this pretty look does not hide the fact that the movie for the most part is pretty boring. There's nowhere near enough action or suspense to captivate viewers, and as a result the movie plods along very slowly. The little action and suspense there is isn't particularly engaging. The only interest comes from wondering about questionable decisions from Margheriti and his screenwriters, from plot turns that don't make much sense to the fact that the three magical helpers that assist Tab Hunter along his journey were clearly ripped off from the animated Disney movie "Sleeping Beauty", which came out a few years earlier.

bkoganbing The only two names us film fans from the English speaking world will recognize is that of Tab Hunter and Rosanna Podesta in The Golden Arrow. This is another of a gazillion epics made in Italy in the late 50s and 60s to take advantage of those Ben-Hur, Quo Vadis, and Cleopatra sets that American companies built for those productions and left for the Italian cinema.As for Hunter he was one of several B list actors who left for Europe to appear in these and in spaghetti westerns just coming into being at the time. After this one he never did another for which he was grateful no doubt,It's the usual Arabian Nights type fare with Hunter as a bandit who's really a prince lest how else could he compete for the hand of princess Rosanna Podesta and defeat the evil vizier who's peddling her hand in marriage to an even eviler prince.But before Hunter can do that he's got to go through a lot of adventures and collect his arsenal which consists of a magic carpet and magic Golden Arrow which always hits what it's aimed at. Like the Lone Ranger, Tab only shoots to wound or disabled. He's got a posse of three wizards who could have been played by the 3 Stooges. Now that might have been interesting. For reasons only God could imagine they dubbed Hunter's voice with an actor who sounded an awful lot like Stephen Boyd. He might have made more sense than blond All American Tab Hunter in the part.

MARIO GAUCI I was looking forward to this one, being a fan of Arabian Nights fantasies and in view of cult director Margheriti's participation (unusually billed under his real name here, instead of the familiar pseudonym Anthony M. Dawson!); distributed internationally by MGM, the film used to crop up from time to time on the TCM U.K. schedule – but it may have been the 1936 Warner Bros. effort bearing the same title, and which I acquired not too long ago via this very channel, all along!Anyway, the movie is appropriately colourful and intermittently diverting; yet, given the utter lack of originality, the result is mainly dreary – not helped by lifeless treatment, ill-advised star casting (blond Tab Hunter as the proverbial 'prince who was a thief'!) and ropey special effects (the handiwork of the obligatory suppliers of resistible comedy relief, a buffoonish trio of wizards who literally come down to earth to aid the hero regain his throne)!! The current princess (Rossana Podesta', a regular of such costumed fare) is contended by a number of potentates, one of whom is in league with the – what else? – wicked Grand Vizier (for once, though, he does not covet either the girl or the throne himself, apparently content merely to pull the strings at court!). Eventually, she asks them to bring her the most precious gift – but, what they come up with (a crystal ball, a life- restoring potion and a magic carpet), has equal value in her eyes when she is stricken by a 'mysterious' illness and near death!Hunter naturally has a coterie of bandit pals (who initially turn against him when he allows the kidnapped princess to flee rather than demand a ransom for her) – but their role is downplayed in favour of the afore-mentioned magicians. Incidentally, the script is indiscriminate in its borrowings: the titular weapon is first presented as having Excalibur-type powers i.e. only the right person can handle it; while, halfway through, we get thoroughly pointless sections that would have better served the peplum genre involving a cave guarded by flaming monsters and, subsequently, a Theban community – from what I could gather, under some sorcerer's spell – which the hero saves (by destroying a temple in the desert)! The climax, then, features the protagonist's 'supernatural' sidekicks dumping jars from the air on the assailing forces and Hunter adopting the golden arrow to slice up the villains' own flying rug!

Lars-Toralf Storstrand I mean it. This movie stinks sulphur and brimstone, while being sweet laden with sugar and honey on top –yuck. As if that wasn't enough it makes you feel sticky and wanting to puke afterwards. Even as historically incorrect as absolutely possible. Stating these realities about this movie is actually kinder than it deserves.It is incredible that someone even wanted to finance the making of such ill-conceived tales.It would have been better of, had it been a pornographic setting - because that is just about how yucky this film really is.If you want to have a good time. Skip this one.