indypoet65
While i haven't seen the movie yet, i can tell you guys that the hunting's are true and that the recent people who have lived there have reported so many ghostly sightings and noises it has made this farm an unsettling place to be around. There is a series on television called my Haunted house or my true ghost story, not sure of the exact title, that features this residence and story. I remember the story of Herb, being that i used to venture out to the gay bars and ran into friends in his circle. I am glad i didn't know him personally.. the story is true.. i can tell you that.. Fox Hollow Farm is truly haunted.. Sadly, there are still parts of the young mens bodies there somewhere on the property.
zwolf
I don't say that lightly, and I've watched thousands and thousands of movies, good and bad. I'm a frequent buyer of those 20-movies-for-$5 packs and actually like a lot of them, so I grade them pretty easy -- I'm not expecting Kurosawa out of a film like this, so I'm very lenient.But, damn, dude.This was so badly made I don't see how anyone did it without *applying* themselves to screwing it up. The editing is completely and utterly incompetent. I cannot think of any editing that's worse. It is, literally, like watching a TV whose remote is in the hands of a cranked-up channel surfer with a half-second attention span. And it's frustrating because the material itself was interesting... it's just completely ruined by the editing technique. All the flow of the narrative is destroyed. Stories are joined and left mid-sentence to go to part of a line from another story. Half the time we aren't given a clue as to who the person talking is or what they're referring to. Segments -- most of them irrelevant in the first place -- are repeated over and over like sampling in a rap song. Information about the serial killer is intercut with ghost-hunting stuff, wrecking the narrative flow of both.It's like trying to read a book while someone constantly yanks it out of your hands.After watching the whole thing I still have very little idea about what this serial killer actually did, or what "haunting" events led these ghost hunters to investigate the place (other than one sighting of a "guy in a red shirt with no legs" - that's looped a few times). The viewer is simply not given sufficient information on anything.And the ghost-hunters are goofy, trying to scare themselves with a lot of "did you hear that?" b.s., jumping at every shadow and trying to pretend there are words in the EVP nonsense. (I've gone on Halloween expeditions with "real" ghost-hunters before, and they're hilarious about trying to make something out of EVP static, so this is not unique just to this film). Nothing really happens, and it's not "spooky" at all. A narrator comes in with some clumsy poetry to try to make it seem profound, but... nothing freaking happened, dude. NOTHING.I was more than willing to play along in hopes of some scares. I watch A Haunting, which covers similar stories (and for a similar budget - man, that's a cheap show), and it's hokey but it's entertaining. It's not the budget's fault. I'm not sure about the source material -- maybe there's not much to the Fox Hollow story to begin with -- but I wanted to be interested in it. Unfortunately, this film gives the situation no reason to be spooky, because it hasn't provided the viewer with any real background info or solid story to follow, just half-snippets that may have been leading somewhere before, oops, we cut away from them again because that person was talking for more than two seconds and Mr. Hall just couldn't stand it. There'll suddenly be stuff about "we found the body on the beach..." and then, zap, we're off to something else before we find out what body, who they were, how they were killed, ANYTHING.The editing makes me wonder if Dan T. Hall has ever actually SEEN a movie or even heard a story. It's like someone took him off a desert island where he was born, gave him a basic description of what editing is - i.e. "putting segments of video together" -- and he just said, "Oh, yeah, I can do that!" and then went at it with all the fury of attention-deficit-disorder driving him. You literally could toss film into a blender, chop it up, then tape it back together in the dark and have a better chance at creating something coherent. It's like watching a toddler play with a light switch for an hour.I'm bewildered by this thing. I wasn't exactly bored (fortunately it's only a little over an hour), but was amazed by how poorly it was made. There are no filmmaking instincts on display here at all, I mean, not even rudimentary. I have to wonder if it's not some prank on us, some "you people are idiots, so here, I bet you'll even sit through this" act of spite.If you're ever going to make a documentary, please watch this one first, and then don't do *anything* the way it's done here.
CollinSchlegel SchlegelcFM
Recently my friend got me one of those $5, 20 horror movie packs that you might find at K- mart; Well this film happened to be in it. The title was deceiving as I was wanting a film like "The Messageners" as country farm houses with ghosts are a turn on for me horror wise. But the film itself was very creepy and spooky to say the least.The whole story is about many murders that took place in Indianapolis, IN in the late to mid-90's and the serial killer behind all of them. Both Paranormal investigations are done and as well federal investigations throughout. You are also told the events of what happened very well If you happen to see this film it's definitely worth a watch!
Woodyanders
This documentary about a haunted remote rural estate where a series of horrible murders occurred has an engrossing premise, but alas director Dan T. Hall doesn't focus enough on any specific aspect of said premise and jumps around way too much to the point where it gets pretty annoying after a while. Moreover, the barely over an hour running time proves to be another serious problem; this movie would have benefited from a longer running time in order to explore the subject matter in a more through and illuminating manner. Hall's overly flashy style rates as another major flaw; it draws way too much attention to itself and makes the attempts at milking the inherent creepiness of the premise seem really forced and heavy handed as well as more than a little tasteless (the use of stark black and white for certain segments in particular not only comes across as both self-conscious and unnecessary, but also qualifies as a distinctly questionable tacky embellishment that compromises the integrity of the film itself). As it is, it's so-so, but given the subject matter this documentary could (and should) have been much better.
