Konterr Brilliant and touching

ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

Tayyab Torres Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

Rainey Dawn Viking Prince Harald has returned to his homeland along with his younger brother Guntar. The two brothers soon learn that King Sveno of Norway has murdered their father. King Sveno is forcing his cousin Hilde to marry the Danish King in order to create an alliance with them. In order to stop this and avenge his father's death Harald disguises himself as a Danish ambassador to gain entrance into Sveno's stronghold. Harald runs into Hilde, learns she does not want to marry the Danish King and he falls in love with her. Harald has his hands full and more on his plate when his brother Guntar is captured and the real Danish ambassador enters the picture. Prince Harald must straighten all this out.As exciting as this scenario sounds, the film barely caught my attention at times. The actors and the dialogue was unappealing to me. It was filmed in such a way that it left me bored with it half of the time.2/10

Leofwine_draca A rousing adventure yarn made in probably Italy's finest year for costume adventures. If not the finest then it was probably the most prolific, I'm sure that at least a hundred such titles like this and other muscleman epics must have been made in 1961. The list of them is endless, if you don't believe me then just check out the IMDb. THE LAST OF THE VIKINGS is one of the films in the seafaring sub-genre and is a colourful romp throughout, with some good direction from Giacomo Gentilomo (and apparently an uncredited Mario Bava, although I have yet to hear this verified?).Things start off well with the opening titles playing over a Viking long ship sailing into shore. The small army arrive on land, perturbed as their trumpet calls go unanswered. This leads to a brief handful of atmospheric scenes in which a messenger walks around the surrounding countryside sounding his horn to no response, with only skeletons and ruined temples in view. After this brief but haunting interlude, the film begins for real with the arrival of a friend who tells the tale of the cruel King Sveno who has captured the Norse throne through force alone and murdered the rightful king. We immediately know that he must and will be stopped at any cost, so the scene is set for a showdown between the forces of good and evil.Taking the lead is the underrated Cameron Mitchell, who doesn't seem to get much credit for all the movies that he's made. I'm sure he appeared in a dozen of these Italian productions over a period of years but nobody seems to dwell over him as they do Steve Reeves. Sure, he's not muscular like Reeves but his acting is as good as, if better than that of Reeves. Mitchell is the just but vicious Viking leader, Harald, who fights for the forces of good throughout the movie. He's saddled with a younger, stupid brother Guntar who gets himself in all sorts of scrapes but still finds time to romance Hilda, a Norse maiden, while all this goes on.The film starts off slowly with little action but picks up as it goes along. The subplot of Harald infiltrating the enemy castle under the guise of a Danish messenger from the king is a good one, leading to plenty of tense and fraught moments as his identity is threatened to be revealed. When it finally is revealed, the scene is set for some good action as Harald fights off the guard and barricades himself in a prison cell where he discovers that his captured brother has been crucified! Rescuing him, the pair jump into the sea but only Harald survives. In the typical tradition he burns his brother's body on a funeral pyre. Eventually, after discovering and brutally murdering a traitor in their midst (by chopping his hand off, apparently!), Harald and his men storm the enemy castle, taking massive injuries from the arrows and spears of their enemy. Their secret, though, is to throw burning tree trunks from the top of their makeshift tower over the battlements, thus destroying most of the archers in a single go. Then the hand-to-hand combat men arrive and the scene is set for a violent confrontation man-to-man with an obvious outcome.Although I found this film hard to get into at first, and occasionally boring, as soon as Harald goes undercover in the enemy's castle the movie picks up and stays fast-paced until the rousing climax. The photography is good, crisp and colourful and with a couple of inventive camera angles (love the camera that followed a rolling tower from UNDERNEATH as it went past). Especially in the battle scenes, which are well staged and very exciting. Also surprising is the high level of violence and brutality. During the battles one man is hacked in the head with an axe and we see blood pouring down his face! Another goes through the old "arrow in the eye" routine! Plus the usual quota of stabbings, impalings and slashings. It's all violent fun.Another main reason to hunt down this film is to see Edmund Purdom overact like no-one before him. In the lists of bad performances, Purdom must surely rank near the top for his completely barmy portrayal of the snivelling, whining, and totally without merit King Sveno, who spends most of the film grovelling, cackling, sneering, or just generally being a creep. I love it! It makes a change from his good-natured turn as the hero in QUEEN OF THE NILE, that's for sure. Along with Purdom, Mitchell's strong hero and some unusually believable supporting acts make the cast above average. All this is topped by a stirring score which highlights the battle and action while giving the movie an almost mythical feel. In all, THE LAST OF THE VIKINGS is a bit of a classic and should be hunted down by fans of these adventure films.

MARIO GAUCI With this, I start a clutch of reviews in honour of Mario Bava's centenary; I plan to watch a comprehensive marathon of his vast (and often uncredited) body of work – incidentally, virtually the only title I will be missing out on is the similar ATTACK OF THE NORMANS (1962), which I own solely on VHS recorded off Italian TV but whose tape I have been unable to track down in time! As it happens, I have a comparable copy of the film under review (with which it shares leading man Cameron Mitchell) – but, for this second viewing, I opted to check out the English-dubbed version off "You Tube"…which was not so bad as these things go, despite having to make do with washed-out colours and rampant panning-and-scanning!Anyway, the movie was not only Mitchell's debut European venture (which, among others, led to as many as six collaborations with Bava) but the first of several "Norse operas" to emerge from Italy, clearly in the wake of the classic Hollywood spectacle THE VIKINGS (1958) – belying the film's very title, which generally implies (but is seldom the case, if ever) that a definitive statement was intended! Among those that came after it were two by Bava and with Mitchell himself, namely ERIK THE CONQUEROR (from the same year) and KNIVES OF THE AVENGER (1966). Interestingly, another offshoot "series" of THE VIKINGS dealt with various fighting people (such as Mongols and Tartars) that included not only the above-mentioned ATTACK OF THE NORMANS but THE COSSACKS (1960) as well – which had Edmund Purdom for villain and who reprises the same duties here, albeit in far more caricatured (read: scenery-chewing) terms! Indeed, the script seems to suffer from undigested gobs of Shakespeare – as Purdom's evil Scandinavian king was clearly modeled on Richard III, while a supporting character is egged on by his ambitious wife towards laying claim to the Viking throne a' la "Macbeth" and Mitchell himself displays a Hamlet-like tendency towards dragging of feet in exacting his vengeance! Plotting is otherwise quite routine (a revenge-seeking hero, impersonation, a romance that runs less than smoothly, betrayal, torture, the inevitable righting of wrongs, and what have you) but this type of crowd-pleasing fare is hardly expected to be anything more.That said, the movie is certainly enjoyable thanks as much to the always welcome genre trappings (in the form of the vivid medieval atmosphere, a handful of violent skirmishes, the Vikings' rowdy behavior and lusty disposition, etc.) as the inferred histrionic approach (with even Mitchell – prone to calling Purdom's royal "Schven" – and younger sibling Giorgio Ardisson – the two would play unknowing twins in the subsequent ERIK THE CONQUEROR – tending to ham it up!). I would imagine that the latter picture, over which Bava had greater control, was the better overall effort but, really, none of the director's peplums constitute major achievements, let alone masterpieces! Amusingly, the Viking call sounded on the horn here felt awfully familiar to my ears – and I would not be surprised if it were lifted outright for ERIK itself!

bkoganbing A couple of Hollywood names Cameron Mitchell and Edmond Purdom who were finding it harder and harder to get decent big screen roles with the coming of television spent some time in Italy in the Sixties doing all kinds of film genres. In The Last Of The Vikings the two are on opposite sides as Viking prince Mitchell seeks to reclaim the throne of his father which has been stolen by Purdom the usurper.In Hollywood in some of his more known features, Edmond Purdom was said to be wooden by some critics. To make up for that Purdom chews an entire carpet factory in his performance. It reminded me of Jay Robinson as Caligula on steroids it was that overacted. Purdom was such a nut case I found it hard to believe anyone would join in a revolt with this loony tune as a usurper.As a study in the extent that overacting can be carried on screen, I recommend watching The Last Of The Vikings, otherwise beware.