Cubussoli Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Catangro After playing with our expectations, this turns out to be a very different sort of film.

Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

mackdenny This is almost as good as "Plan 9 from Outer Space" right up there with Nia Peeples in "Battle of Los Angeles"

Michael Ledo On a distant planet a group of white people and clones, all with various Earth accents live on a planet 70 years after a nuclear war. The clones have a mark above and below the left eye that looks like printing on a piece of tape or band-aid. There isn't much of a starship that actually flies in space other than the quick CG opening scene. They travel around in a tank that is about ten times larger inside than outside, a loaner from Dr. Who no doubt. There are women who where red mop heads as wigs. There are mutants and a really large mutant they must kill, most likely because "Resident Evil" had one for no good reason either, although this one is Godzilla size.The film was not well organized. The little girl who gave the introduction was a lousy speaker. This was another DVD I had to crank up the volume like a boot-leg. Subtitles would have been nice with a better set-up of characters.Guide: F-word. Sex. No nudity.

John Norton If this were a high school project for a drama or A/V group it would be commendable on some levels. Offering it for paid viewing however is near criminal. As another user has noted, a very incongruous and saturated use of profanity - not that there is anything wrong with heavy profanity usage per se, as long as it is integral and flowing - detracts heavily from being able to watch this already nigh-unwatchable flick. Poor continuity, scripting, editing, special effects, use of stock footage ... you get the idea.I love watching sci-fi movies new or old, and am probably more willing to suspend belief for many aspects of a bad movie than others: but this was just bad without virtually any saving graces. One exception is that there was one actress who I could see even in this atrocity had potential.Full disclosure ... I FFWD'd through some of the movie and in the end this review IS based on seeing probably only 2/3rds of the whole thing. However, I gritted my teeth so that I could say I gave it as fair a review as it deserved before recommending you avoid wasting the 10 minutes it took before you turned it off.

Granger "Obscene language is the refuge of those lacking the ability to say anything more intelligent."While I am never fond of movies that resort to repeated foul language, I don't really make an issue of this in most of my reviews. That's what the Parental Advisory is for. Reviews are for reviewing the movie itself.In this case I make an exception. Repeated F-bombing is so excessive and gratuitous it actually distracts from the plot to the point of making the film painful to watch. Which is why I stopped watching it about 7 minutes in and hit the 1-star rating... which I try to reserve for "worse than SyFy channel" movies. The equally bad scripting makes any toleration of this flick nigh impossible. Tiny spoiler illustration: Within the first 3 minutes a woman intentionally and for no discernible reason leaves a perfectly good shelter to get stomped on by a giant monster. Dialog: "What's that sound?" "I don't know. Something big." -- Woman slowly backs out of shelter where she was totally safe, looks up, screams and is stomped.Seriously?I figured the plot line can only get worse from that point on. It did. I stopped it several minutes later, unable to stomach any further terrible writing. Asylum could take notes in "bad" from these script writers.