ChanFamous I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.

Voxitype Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

Ogosmith Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

vchimpanzee The movie begins with a lot of photos of African and Middle Eastern people, in countries where there is instability. What have I gotten myself into? But this is the excellent work of photographer Lee, who is back home in the United States. She has broken up with boyfriend John, but she needs some of her equipment back from him and he's not answering the phone. She goes to his house and it's obvious the place has been abandoned, but there is food no one has eaten (no one human, anyway). Something has happened. She goes to the cops. Sgt. Goodman seems helpful. Later it is clear he has done a thorough job of investigating, and he does come up with answers.Lee goes to an exhibit of her photography. Her daughter Jessie is also a photographer, but her photos are merely art (very good art, too) rather than serving any substantial purpose. Jessie and Lee have a difficult relationship since Lee was hardly ever around when she was a child. And Lee's father Malik is now her ex-husband but they seem to have a friendly relationship.The photos are reminders of traumatic events, and with all that is going on in her life, Lee ends up in a mental institution.Four months earlier, Lee was recovering in a rehab facility from a bombing in Somalia. That's where she met John, who was also hurt and was so nice to her there.Then we go back to the present. Peter, a lawyer is also in the hospital receiving therapy. Dr. Bloom is treating them both. What a shame. I was enjoying the scenes from the past.But we'll get back to that. Lee will get out of the hospital and see the storage facility where John works and homeless Thomas lives. Lee and John have an enjoyable relationship which starts with her taking photos of him. Only later does it get troubled.And back to the present. It gets very confusing. Lee continues her therapy, worried that she killed John because she remembers doing something that could have killed him. Did she really? And Lee and Peter meet and become friends. One reason she likes him: he looks like John, but without a beard. And this is connected with the fact that the credits list a "Real Peter". I won't say why.Lee's relationship problems are complicated further, both four months ago and in the present, by her difficulties with Jessie.Also, we get to see Lee at work in Somalia with her translator. I'm going to guess her name is Hawa, from looking at the credits, but I didn't get her name from watching. Actually, I'd like to have seen more of these scenes.If the back and forth isn't confusing enough, some scenes are repeated, with some missing detail included on the second, third or fourth time.And we finally get some answers. Not the ones I was expecting or hoping for.Jennifer Jason Leigh is not that cute teenager from "Fast Times at Ridgemont High". I forget how many years ago that was. Someone in the movie comments that Lee looks younger than her age, but I think she looks her age. In some scenes she makes an effort to look good, but really her looks aren't that important since she has such an appealing personality. When she's not depressing. Even in those other scenes, I eventually adjust because Leigh does such a good job overall. She gives us quite a range of emotions and feelings, from nearly helpless or mentally incapacitated to troubled and confused to very confident, though I'm happiest when she's pleasant and funny. Yes, this is occasionally a romantic comedy.Martin Henderson effectively shows us two very different characters.Marianne Jean-Baptiste makes an excellent therapist. I would have been happier if the camera operator could have stayed still in her scenes.I was very surprised to see Meat Loaf in the credits. I don't care for the singer at all, but I knew the actor playing Sgt. Goodman did a good job, but I never suspected, even though I had seen the name earlier, that it was him.Alia Shawkat does a good job too as the troubled daughter.Overall, this is worth seeing, if you're willing to be challenged.

lemailprodedenis I enjoyed this movie very much, and i have to say, i thought the comments were a little bit sharp. "The moment" is a great psychological thriller, a bit old fashioned (maybe), but the aesthetic is very modern (great light....) What makes the movie interesting is that it's less about what really happened to one of the characters than what will come out of the relationship between a mother & her daughter. You can watch "The Moment" as a mere thriller but it is basically about trying to be a good mother and a good daughter. About acceptance & forgiveness. The script is great, twisted, it's like a novel written in first person, you never know if you trust the main character. And J.J. Leigh is amazing, as usual.

MartinHafer I was nice seeing Jennifer Jason Leigh in "The Moment", as she's a very talented woman and I have marveled at her skills after seeing her years ago in "The Hudsucker Proxy" (it's one of the most underrated films of the decade and she was wonderful in the film). What surprised me, though, is that she is in her 50s and she sure looked amazingly young-- and I thought she was a decade younger. She's also quite good in this movie, though the script occasionally let her and the audience down-- though at other times, it's quite clever and unusual.The film is a bit difficult to follow at the beginning. This is because the film jumps about sequentially--and continues to do so from time to time. If you pay attention, this shouldn't be a problem--but you really have to focus on what is occurring and when. Because of this, I don't recommend you watch it if you are tired or just want a casual viewing experience.Leigh plays Lee (huh?), a successful photographer who is losing her mind. Not surprisingly, she soon ends up in a psychiatric hospital--a very nice private clinic where she receives regular therapy. Through the course of this treatment, her back story is revealed and it involves a guy named John (Martin Henderson). John seems like a decent sort of guy and she soon is in love with him. However, there are VERY serious and unexpected consequences and soon John disappears. Lee has convinced herself that she must have killed him, though her therapist assumes this is a manifestation of her mental illness. Through the course of their time together as well as her new friendship with a man who looks almost EXACTLY like John (ALSO played by Martin Henderson), she comes to realize the truth as well as the truth about her troubled relationship with her daughter.I generally liked the film. A few minor things, however, could have used a bit of polish. One is a problem most folks won't notice. With my background as a psychotherapist as well as teaching psychology, I realized that either Lee's therapist was not especially well written. In most movies and TV shows, psychologists and psychiatrists are shown asking tons of questions and even uttering the stupid phrase 'how does that make you feel?'--though universities teaching new therapists avoid these clichés mostly because they don't help the therapeutic process. While it wouldn't look good in a movie, a good therapist actually says very little and pushes the patient to do most of the talking. Again, however, most folks won't know that this SHOULD be the case. What most will recognize, however, is that the resolution of the film isn't completely satisfying and you may be left wondering if perhaps the film could have ended in a more satisfying manner. Finally, with Martin Henderson playing nearly identical strangers--that is ridiculous. So if I see these problems, why do I still give the movie a B? Well, the acting is very good and quite convincing. Additionally, the plot is creative and interesting--even with a few hiccups. The film is out this week from Netflix--and it's well worth seeing.

KM_391 I'll start off with something positive: all of the performances in "The Moment" were quite good. The casting was really spot-on, and all the actors performed admirably. Jennifer Jason Lee does a great job capturing the essence of a woman completely detached from reality. Beyond that, I couldn't find anything I liked about this movie, starting with the extreme shaky-cam throughout (was this movie shot from a canoe?) to the awkward, mumbling lost-soul characters, the too- close close-ups, constant loss of focus, the confusing time-jumps forward and back and around again, and the dialogue that just never rang true for me. If I saw that refrigerator butter dish one more time I was going to scream. I couldn't help but wonder "Who put up money for this?" At the after-party at the Tribeca Film Festival, the crowd was quiet and polite during the Q&A, and the only audience question was from someone curious about the therapist scenes. That's a clue. In the unofficial poll I conducted among people I spoke with at the party, the only folks who liked the movie were either psych patients or psychology students. So I guess the bottom line is, if you're crazy, you'll love this movie.