The Navigator: A Medieval Odyssey

1988 "An Odyssey Across Time."
6.6| 1h32m| en
Details

Cumberland, 1348. The plague is spreading in medieval England. The remote village of little Griffin is also threatened. But the 9-year-old boy has a recurring dream that holds the key to a tiny hope of survival: a lake with a coffin floating on it. A white church with an iron cross. A falling glove. A falling silhouette. A torch tumble through a dark shaft into infinity. With his brother he recognizes in it a prophecy to escape the Black Death. So they embark with a few men on a journey to a distant cathedral, where they want to set up an iron cross as an offering to God. Her path leads them through a deep and dark mine shaft into an unknown land and completely outlandish time - into the present-day New Zealand of the 1980s.

Director

Producted By

New Zealand Film Commission

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Also starring Bruce Lyons

Reviews

Yash Wade Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.
Brennan Camacho Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.
Juana what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.
Jenni Devyn Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.
Michael Neumann A group of miners from a 14th century English village in the path of the Black Plague follow the recurring dreams of a young boy and tunnel through the Earth into the 20th century, where they hope to appease God by raising a cross atop the highest church in New Zealand. Director Vincent Ward is a name worth watching, if only his narrative skills would catch up to his visionary style. His sophomore feature is no less haunting than his 1984 debut film 'Vigil', but likewise suffers from sketchy characters and an underwritten script. The villagers' quest for spiritual redemption has no real parallel in our own age (despite casual comparisons between the Plague, the AIDS epidemic, and the nuclear arms race), and the only reason for bringing them into the 20th century is to see their confusion with automobiles and television. The often striking visual scheme gives the film a strictly cosmetic impression of depth and meaning, but Ward's Little Nemo resolution, and the forced irony of the epilogue, only underlines the lack of a story built around his compelling, original idea.
aether22 No, don't do this thing, it really is a pretty awful movie. I like almost every time travel movie I have seen including the bad ones and I am a New Zealander but this movie is one confusing arts letdown of a movie, I didn't like the movie one bit but it still would have better if the ending had not been so bad.I agree with the view that the others must have been taking drugs to enhance this movie, either that or they will be happy with anything incomprehensible.And there isn't any time travel anyway.Also the movie is B&W for much of it's run. It is shot at night.
noelcox This is an imaginative but slightly strained film. It promises more than it really delivers, and the message is sometimes delivered with all the finesse of a sledgehammer. This is epitomised by the American nuclear submarine as the symbol of all that is evil.The portrayal of rural England at the time of the Black Death was atmospheric - though that it not to say that it was accurate. The accents in particular were a problem. Haven't film-makers heard any regional accents (these people are supposed to come from Cumberland -not Cumbria - which is in England) that they have to fall back on Irish-Scottish? Or perhaps this simply reflects the actors' limitations. But the major problem with the film, reflected in other comments, was that it was confusing. Was the boy's tale purely imagination (a form of foreknowledge), or did the villagers really travel to the 20th century - surely the former.The commentator who wrote of the "apparent pathological need for every car driver in the movie to try to run the characters down, without any attempt to swerve, stop, or otherwise avoid them" obviously hasn't driven in New Zealand. It is standard driving etiquette to ignore obstacles, or hit them if possible.
boingo_the_clown I just saw "The Navigator" for the first time last night, and I must say that it is a very well done film. Unlike Hollywood films, the medieval characters are not simply modern men in medieval garb, nor are they treated as ignorant buffoons. The portrayal of the characters is highly believable.They see everything with religious and medieval attitudes, and try to cope with the nightmare world of a modern city as best they can, in order to complete their pilgrimage / quest. This is perhaps the greatest strength of the film, as it helps the viewer to successfully suspend his disbelief and identify with the characters.It may be subtle, but there is also medieval symbolism used in the movie.There are some things in the movie that don't quite make sense, like the complete willingness for the foundry workers to help a group of people who should for the most part seem insane to anyone not knowing they are actually from the fourteenth century, or the apparent pathological need for every car driver in the movie to try to run the characters down, without any attempt to swerve, stop, or otherwise avoid them. These, however, are merely nit picking trifles, when placed in the context of the full story.It is not the greatest movie I have seen, but I would definitely say that it is worth a look. It's respect for and realistic depiction of it's medieval characters is a strength that really helps to hold the movie together.I give it a thumbs up.