Scanialara
You won't be disappointed!
Ensofter
Overrated and overhyped
Smartorhypo
Highly Overrated But Still Good
Bluebell Alcock
Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies
LordJiggy
Had some good bits, and a lot of promise.Didn't have much of a script. Some scenes are terrible padding to fill out the sketch.Some funny characters, but again the lazy script went for cheap cheap laughs instead of stretching the tiniest bit to be original (see "joke, fart") that is done over and over.Disappointing because it could have been something consistently enjoyable and reasonably original. As it is, it wasted a lot of the actors' time...and mine.
DBLurker
Is this a bad movie? Nope.It has good acting, nicely done monsters (makeup) with a lot of gore and action, mixed with comedy of course.The thing is, it could've failed if the characters weren't able to work together, but they do. They compliment each other quite well and have their own quirks which keep them fun till the end. Also, I liked how the characters, most of the time, were just interested in staying alive and running away than run into battle. Of course the movie later on makes them run into the danger else it wouldn't be fun if they just hid and waited for help.The problem is, the "big bad" just doesn't really do much other than start a zombie vampire plague, then just disappears only to reappear half-way through, get attacked and just vanish all over again. So the big bad villain is still out there, was that done for the sequel? Not sure that was a good idea because I didn't really feel satisfied with the ending. They seem to be more interested in setting up a sequel.Overall, this movie is a fun popcorn flick that you can enjoy. Could've been more though, a bit disappointing.
a_baron
In recent years, a number of horror films have consisted of little more than small groups of people walking around in dark or semi-dark buildings fighting at times intangible enemies. Some succeed, some do not. "The Night Watchmen" succeeds. A rock musician quits the music scene and the only job he can get is as a night security guard for the "Baltimore Gazette" newspaper. He has a baptism of fire because a famous clown and his entire troupe who had died from a mysterious illness while on tour in Romania have been repatriated, and someone opens his coffin to take a ghoulish souvenir.Soon, the building is crawling with vampires, and the nightwatch team - four men and an office girl - are hemmed in from all sides. It takes only a few minutes for the viewer to realise this film is not to be taken too seriously. It succeeds partly because of the soundtrack but largely because of a non-stop stream of wisecracks, innuendo and at times toilet humour.
scott_dunning
This movie had a real 80's vibe about it (especially the music) and reminded me of movies like "Vamp", "Return of the living dead" and "Demons". It's definitely not an A-grade blockbuster and the special effects are OK at best but it was still a bit of fun. The acting was not terrible, I've seen a lot worse. I was super surprised to see James Remar in this movie, especially the role he played. Most of the actors playing the vamps did a fairly decent job and were believable. It's not going to win any awards but if you're sitting at home wanting to waste an hour and a half you could do a lot worse. Cheers :-)