SpecialsTarget Disturbing yet enthralling

Borgarkeri A bit overrated, but still an amazing film

Salubfoto It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

pointyfilippa The movie runs out of plot and jokes well before the end of a two-hour running time, long for a light comedy.

Joseph Godfrey I ran across this pilot maybe 10 years too late, but I'm here to say how happy I am that Warner Brothers did not pick this garbage up. And by "garbage", I mean the kind you see on the side of a highway; Trash so bad that it goes ignored without ANY attempt to pick it up.The first thing I disliked was the older brother David. I thought to myself how does Will get to be that lonely kid I identified with from the original series? If Will has always had an older brother then it misses the dynamics of what molds a young child's imagination ... A loneliness that allows such a child to live in their own heads or find surrogate friends through robots. David was completely unnecessary and it became more evident when he was left behind surrounded by aliens. David was just a future plot device.Judy & Penny ... They immediately focused on Judy and I was a little thankful for this. The original series Judy was a background character for Don West to play with. Here she was granted a larger role, but she was still just the love interest. The Judy & Don relationship I remember was built up over time rather than the late-night fling these two began with. I actually preferred Heather Graham's Judy from the 1998 movie; She was a central character not thrown into the cliché "girl meets boy" BS of Hollywood.Penny was reduced to an infant ... maybe to make Maureen Robinson appear more motherly. It irritated me to no end. Penny was my first television crush. She also had the plain tomboyish look that allowed young girls to identify with ... frak knows there's no way to identify with her Barbie doll older sister played by (boob distraction) Adrianne Palicki.Will was the main focus of the original series. Here (much like Jayne Brook's Maureen Robinson with baby Penny) he's a background staple to make Brad Johnson's John Robinson look like a father. Sure Johnson reminded me a great deal of Guy Williams, the original John Robinson. I found myself enjoying him because of that. But the dynamic of father & son are left to one moment of a baseball glove being handed down to a boy that doesn't even know what a baseball glove is. This John Robinson at least tried to be there for his son, the original John Robinson constantly overlooked Will adding to the loneliness of the character.There wasn't really any character here to identify with.Don West. Why bother talking about this guy? I won't even waste your time. He was that dull.John & Maureen Robinson? Nope not interesting enough to discuss. Although perhaps to look at the star of the show which was John Robinson. Why make him the focal point? He became an action hero because that's basically all John Woo can do. The original father of the family was a professor. Here he was updated as some retired Marine or some crap apparently to justify the lame slow-mo action scenes.I suspect Woo grew up with a house full of action heroes that he acted out fight scenes with with no more dialog than "booosh" and "guhhhh". Sure in the original series both John & Don handled the fight sequences ... but Lost In Space was always about the science-fiction NOT some choreographed drop kicking shoot 'em up. It's a Swiss Family Robinson revision that happens in outer-space. The fight/action scenes here were used as FILLER, designed to stretch the story to complete an hour long time period. It made no sense.THE ROBOT. Anytime anyone remembers 'Lost In Space' ... whether it's the old television series or the failed 1998 film ... the biggest attraction has always been the damn ROBOT. What do we get in it's place? A legless C3PO reject. Seriously WTF? Go to the Lost In Space Wikia and see the image of it. Try not to laugh, I dare you ...The face is a bent piece of metal with two holes drilled in it for eyes. It was a metal Muppet. A bad joke. Especially considering they blew 2 million on this pilot. 2 freaking mill and we get a glowing 3D Operation™ game Dr Zachary Smith was not in this pilot. Not sure why. But on the single interesting note that could have worked here - that someone evidently overlooked ... While the protagonists were generic alien rubber suits rather than a terrorist doctor ... it left an opportunity for the Dr. Smith role to actually be an alien. Would have been the only interesting thing about this series if they had seen fit to use such a twist.All in all, I would hope that any future endeavor teaches the idiot executives hired in family that THIS IS NOT HOW IT'S DONE!!! I say Hell Yeah" reboot the show but put (maybe) someone like Ronald D. Moore in charge. Someone that knows character development & a thing or two about science fiction.

Thomas_Veil The wait continues for those who love those early episodes of "Lost in Space" from 1965 and want more.First we watched the original series slowly degenerate into camp. Then we got the 1998 theatrical film which started promisingly and then, like the series, got silly. And now this pilot, in which the first half consists of whining characters we never really learn to care about, and the second half is a formulaic alien invasion story.Where is the sense of wonder here that permeated the original series? Douglas Petrie's script, in attempt to add character depth to what many people consider a ridiculous show, just falls flat. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't send a family who can't get their you-know-what together on a major space mission. And John Woo's direction, especially in the action-packed second half of the show, proceeds at breakneck speed with no sense of pacing. Like too many films these days, it's fastfastfast and never pauses to take a breath.The antagonists in this pilot were a particularly poor choice. Unlike Dr. Smith, who was interesting because you always wanted to know what was going on in that scheming mind of his, these villains have absolutely no sense of subtlety. When the show demands a crafty J. R. Ewing-type, we get instead marauding critters out of a 1950s horror film.And did you notice -- so much of the focus in this pilot is on the kids! Gee, what went wrong with the original series? Oh yeah, that's right!Kevin Burns, whose "Time Tunnel" pilot was much better but still resembled the original in little besides nomenclature, really needs to turn over the duties of reviving Irwin Allen TV series to someone who understands them better. "Lost in Space" could be a great show again, and it deserves better than this.

dukeb0y Were do I start? This is what Lost In Space could have been. I agree with other reviews, the background of the people and plot is well done. We get a feel of what is going on, but no predictability, like so many movies.The only copy I know of, is the DVD one, that looks like a poor VHS tape. I sure would like to see the original.Here is what makes this...GOOD. I sat down to watch this with some friends and kids, they thought it was really good. (They know I love the old show!)So, a 'might have been' sitting in a WB vault somewhere. Production value is good, overall. I didn't car for the new robot, but everything else, including the new Jupiter II, looks great.

Mandemus I guess most people who have seen this unaired TV pilot at this point either worked on the show or saw one of the bootleg versions that pop up on the internet occasionally. I am in the latter group.The Robinsons: Lost in Space was interesting to me mostly for the curiosity factor. The special effects were as good or better than most TV SF in the 1990s or early 2000s. The actors were good. Even the young actors were very professional. There was no low-budget feel to this effort at all, and it would have been great to see where this series might have gone.My main disappointment was the paucity of science fiction present in this science fiction show. The original series (1965-1968), although sometimes silly and childish (it was aimed at children, after all), did indeed focus on some element of science fiction each week. In The Robinsons, the science was mostly in passing. For example, Will's robot experiment was a quick scene. The worm hole was used as a quick device to get them lost, but that's about all.Still, for the Lost in Space completist, or SF fan seeking something that was well made and hard to find, this is well worth a look.