Diagonaldi Very well executed

TrueJoshNight Truly Dreadful Film

Solidrariol Am I Missing Something?

Nicole I enjoyed watching this film and would recommend other to give it a try , (as I am) but this movie, although enjoyable to watch due to the better than average acting fails to add anything new to its storyline that is all too familiar to these types of movies.

Leofwine_draca THE ROWDY GIRLS is a softcore western comedy starring a handful of B-movie queens and not much else. The twist is that while westerns usually feature hard-drinking cowboys who spend their time indulging in gambling, shoot-outs and carefree sex, the gender spin in this film sees women playing the main roles while the guys are second fiddle.As a low budget movie released these days by Troma, it's not really up to much, although the production values are a bit better than you'd expect. The singing cowboy narrator is really annoying and should have been done away with all together. The film has a handful of sex and nude scenes although it isn't bogged down with them.Softcore queen Shannon Tweed has a sweet and tender moment in the woods with her man while Julie Strain, who plays the villain of the piece, has a rather more explicit bedroom interlude. Deanna Brooks makes her debut film role and manages to stand alongside the two more experienced actresses, and there's a bit part for John Waters starlet Mink Stole. The film's not really up to much, but at least it's inoffensive and quite watchable.

Mathieu Doublet Frankly, I don't like westerns very much. If I did purchase the DVD version of "Rowdy Girls", it was for Shannon Tweed, Julie Strain and the Troma sticker on the DVD.For the Troma part, Lloyd Kaufman is executive producer and Troma just distribute the movie. Some kind of participation but not the kind of things you expect in a Troma movie. So "Rowdy Girls" isn't particularly violent. It's a western, of course there are gunshots, even dead people but it's not explicit such as in "Toxic Avenger" for instance."Rowdy Girls" is less than a hour and a half, so it's going quick, has enjoyable scenes with nudity (even though, as mentioned above, it's not explicit) and humor. It makes a good movie to rent and enjoy on a Saturday night.

debbie2 This is not going to win an Oscar, we all know that. However, as a B-movie, I do find it quite watchable. At least it has a plot and I like the fact that the makers of this film don't take itself so seriously and sometimes even make fun of the story or characters themselves (e.g. they have this cowboy singing in front of the camera time by time to tell the storyline). That makes the film more fun to watch. Some people might find the nudity not explicit enough, especially because of the names like Shannon Tweed or Julie Strain are featured in this film. Since Shannon Tweed co-produced this film herself, I believe this is how they intended to make the film: not making a softporn flick full of nonsense sex scenes but a comedy with a bit nudity instead. The acting in general is better as compared to other B-movies. I like Richie Varga who played the Sheriff's brother in the movie. He is such a hunk but is very adorable as well. He deserves to have more film roles in the future.

tomlindh This was typical for a Shannon Tweed movie in that the basic components were several beautiful naked women, frequently love scenes, a little bit of a story line, and some acting.On the other hand, this one did stand out with the utilization of a guitar-strumming narrator, and use of some old-fashioned text narrative, which added a tongue-in-cheek flavor.With a good, judicious use of humor (particularly in one of the early love scenes), this could definitely be classified as a mellow-drama, which I consider a strong point in its favor - it didn't take itself seriously!