Btexxamar I like Black Panther, but I didn't like this movie.

Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.

Jenna Walter The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

Kimball Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

manendra-lodhi I liked this short film because of the reason that from the middle till the end, it is absolute perfection. The story is about a kid who is a music student and who befriends a Man who rides a Roller. The part worth concentrating is the developing of friendship between the two. PROS:The kid looked apt in his part. The way that he starts to take interest in the work of the man and which led to the development of their friendship is good. The story also ends properly. The introduction of some characters in the starting was also good. They helped in moving forward the film and made the base for the character of the kid.MESSAGE: "Friendship is a beautiful aspect of life."VERDICT: "A recommended watch."

lefaikone Tarkovsky has said that Ivan's childhood was his first "real movie" - meaning, a movie which he put his heart and soul into, and a movie which defined to him if he got what it took to be a director or not (needless to say the answer). So I think it's justified to say that this movie actually is more of a dress rehearsal to his later works.In "Sculpting In Time" Tarkovsky presents very strong, even extravagant opinions on the use of colours-, on the structure-, on the use of music etc.- in cinema, which shows best in this picture in it's strange visual look. The strong and flashy colours make it look almost like a colouring book - it's not the most visually brilliant Tarkovsky, but you can clearly see the experimentalism, and how he was trying those theories in practise while making this, which to me, as a Tarkovsky fan, was very interesting to see.Overall, not a masterpiece - good human description (as expected), good actors, nice cinematography, but nothing too mind blowing. I think you get most out of this if you have a bit wider understanding about Tarkovsky's works, which allows you to see this as a gateway to understanding how Tarkovsky became Tarkovsky.

Melissa Smith A gentle tale of a boy-violinist who is taunted by his peers and misunderstood by the predominantly female figures in his life (mother, music teacher, little girl-violinist), but introduced to the world of "manliness" by a chance encounter with a member of the working class. Both boy and man are enriched by the interchange, which crosses lines of class and age.For fans of Tarkovsky, it is more revealing as a foretaste of visual images in the filmmaker's later work than of thematic development. But as a study of human psychology and an image of life in the former Soviet Union, it is a source of much to contemplate. Since the story line has certain gaps in it (the editing seems more image- than plot-oriented), however, it bears watching through twice (at 43 minutes, this is not a cumbersome task!)

tedg Spoilers herein.I credit Tarkovsky with genius, PLUS he was able to use that genius to create a few of the world's most powerful films.This isn't one of them. This is obviously a film made not from his soul but to run through some jackbooted superior's checklist. It is cloyingly sentimental. It actually tells an unambiguous story rooted in reality. It has some competent framing and images, but they don't annotate the situation in the unique fashion that he would when in his stride.Tarkovsky's genius was in creating a netherworld halfway between non-film reality and Joycean dreamstate. He was further able to sustain visual meditations, often for a very long time, on elements of that world. Frequently, those elements would trigger lifealtering poetic constructions in one's mind, different in each viewer. There's none of that here. You may be disappointed unless you stay away.Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 4: Has some interesting elements.