Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

Baseshment I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.

Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

Phillida Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

p-stepien Michael Gondry, renowned for his visual escapism and audacious visuals, brings us a sombre, almost exclusively down-to-earth low key picture of the life and times of a section of the Gondry family. Focused primarily on his Aunt Suzette, a retired school-teacher is a secluded village district, Gondry subtly paints a picture of an ordinary family and its trials and tribulations. Save for the odd bits of quirky animation, a train-set functioning as a time device and a bit of cinematic fun with invisible children, Gondry goes full frontal bare minimum on us, largely escaping more inventive cinematography, instead for a more sombre, albeit simultaneously ecstatic presentation of tidbits of family history.Aunt Suzette is an endearing person, as is her somewhat estranged, even resentful, son Jean Yves. Firmly on their shoulders the almost prosaic movie does delivers moments of restrained satisfaction, much like peeking at home movies of your neighbours. Venturing a bit through time and touching on some grinding internal family issues, Gondry's documentary is a slight odd ode to the Gondry clan, which at times feels too personal to actually be suited for a publicly attainable feature. The movie even features significant snippets of private collections of 16mm home-made movies, which, largely unedited, imprint an even more voyeuristic feel to the viewing. By the end credits I did come to like the family, and even developed an affinity for the warm demeanour of Michael Gondry himself. Suzette as well as draws you in and surprises with small tidbits of prolific wisdom as well as her heartfelt remembrance of days past. This is probably the type of movie most of us would dream of doing - a summary of a life of someone dear to you kept forever on celluloid.

viennasold Gondry's movies are usually strong because they're visually original, creative and have a unique DIY innovative edge, while reflecting genuine humanistic tendencies.The life of the director's aunt is used here in that vein - except there's willingly little to enjoy visually: Gondry attempts to shoot a documentary and aims at a certain 'realism'. Except here, maybe because he's familiar with the cast, which would allow him to ask intimate questions to relatives in the private sphere, 'realism' becomes 'voyeurism'. Questions asked to the poor cast are just plain bad taste. And the humanistic tendencies Gondry so beautifully explored in all his previous movies are travestied in facebook-era voyeurism.A poor, disappointing 'effort' which can evoke, quite oddly, the most sadistic of Andre Gide. Except Gide is fully aware of what he's doing - which Gondry doesn't even notice.

MisterWhiplash You may be asking yourself, and not because you're insensitive but just because it strikes you, 'why is Michel Gondry, director of some of the most visually dazzling and original films of the last decade making some personal documentary about his Aunt and cousin and her time as a schoolteacher and so on?' I suppose, for one, since he damn well feels like it and has a strong bond (or just a strong interest) in his Aunt Suzette and learning more about her and showing her history to us. Whether the film is a home movie should be irrelevant, albeit Gondry makes his movie The Thorn in the Heart as some kind of weird statement on home movies (see how he leaves in the sound the camera makes when he shoots on 16mm) and their organic quality. What matters, ultimately, is if the people are interesting, and if the stories they tell gain our attention, and maybe if we know them a little more at the end or, at best, we want to spend some more time with them.Without going as far to say Gondry made a great personal documentary, he did succeed on those terms I just mentioned. After a short time (and not including a kind of in-jokey opening story at the dinner table with Suzette laughing every other minute), we get into the story of this woman, Michel's Aunt, who lives in a rural village in France, and taught as a schoolteacher, raising her two children (her son, Jean-Yves, gets more time than the daughter, though she is mentioned and perhaps is on screen from time to time), and just living in a town like she did and the places she taught at. Gondry takes his small film crew to film some of these places, now mostly demolished or turned into homes, and he even goes to a rather touching extent of making up a projection room and screens a film (as used to be the place at the old school).Sometimes these stories Suzette, now old and almost if not completely blind, are really amusing and just completely down to earth. We also hear about those she took care of, like Jean-Yves, and about his coming out of the closet (this is talked about in such a matter of fact, or just uncomplicated, way that it's sobering and heartfelt), and about when she took care of her grandkids (or maybe it was another third-generation 12 year old kid) in New York City for a year in 2005 or 2006. Some of these details could be made clearer, but it's hard to look at that as a big bad against the movie when Gondry takes such care in giving her time to speak, clearly, and go through the pages and other things in memory. Indeed the film reminded me of that wonderful film of his, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, as a person looks through the myriad of memories, good and bad, and a train set (one of which that Jean-Yves might have made in his day as a hobby) is used as a transition device from year to year from the 1950s to the 1980's.One of the bad memories that comes to light is the circumstances surrounding the death of Suzette's husband very suddenly in the 70's. She found out on a Monday and didn't tell her kids until two days later (she gives a reason as one of them had very important exams and would be completely devastated - the other one, Jean-Yves, was devastated, and it led to his nervous breakdown some time later). She tells this with great sorrow but as a fact of what happened; Suzette misses her husband, but at the same time is philosophical about death. "I only think about it because I know it's coming soon," she says in narration as she walks through a graveyard. So moments like these, for Michel, are as important as those lighthearted reveries and glances through old photo albums with a friend.There are dark corridors of the past explored, but Gondry isn't going so far as, for example, Zwigoff's film on Crumb. He has too much imagination and an eye for joy that it's just not possible to be too gloomy. He loves this woman and hopes that if we don't love her by the end (and she's for the most part just a painfully normal grandmother, probably nicer than most old people or more understanding from being a teacher), we can admire her. It's on that strength alone I would recommend the film, but there are other little moments that will delight fans of Gondry's work. He throws in some stop-motion animation here and there, and is interested in the splitting up of footage and stock (digital to archive footage to 16mm) as we see a "home movie" being made in front of us.But best of all is a random but inspired scene where he gets a bunch of schoolchildren who've been doing a Q&A with Suzette to put on Chroma-Key shirts and pants (these are the same thing as green-screen), and what we see is floating heads and torsos and little legs playing in the room and the yard. It's moments like these that make me smile in the movies, even if there is no real precise reason it should be in this story of Suzette's at all. 7.5/10

Tom Law Just saw this film in NYC, there was also a Q&A after with the man himself after. I found the film to be a beautiful portrait of someone's life, and how the people around them are affected. Michel said in the Q&A that he wanted to give his Aunt some visual record/history of her life, and this film goes to show that you don't need to create a Hollywood fictional character, real people are just as interesting and entertaining. Gondry uses a mixture of visual formats to illustrate the documentary, from super 8 to his well known stop motion. This adds a richness, and a historical depth that works within the context of the film. The film is emotionally moving at times and also humorous. The film is simple and enjoyable, one that does not need to be taken too seriously, yet carries tones of a maturity in Gondry's work that is often not always so prominent. Go see it!