Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!

Pacionsbo Absolutely Fantastic

Ella-May O'Brien Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Rexanne It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

thor5894 I really wanted to like this one more, it's the kind of domestic drama the French usually do well, but it just didn't work for me. Truffaut takes material grounded in realism and tries to impose a fable-like atmosphere, and ends up in an awkward middle ground. Just one example, he has Fanny Ardant faint at least twice in the movie. Really? Is this 1981 or 1921? I really didn't take to Ardant's performance, though I suspect the script shares the blame for that; she comes off less as a real person than a male construct.The story--Ardant and her husband move next door to Gerard Depardieu and his wife, the two having had an intense affair a decade earlier--is well told and holds interest, but the details are often unconvincing and there's an off-putting tone to the whole affair. For instance, Ardant and Depardieu act frantic about their secret right from the start--but why? Both were single when they were previously a couple, so there would be no scandal in being honest with their spouses, yet both insist on saying nothing. Later in the film, when the truth is exposed, and by this time the two have become adulterous lovers in the present, the respective spouses are maddeningly reasonable about the whole thing. Yeah yeah, they're French, but really, if betrayed spouses always reacted this mildly, people wouldn't feel the need to hide adultery in the first place.This vague inauthentic vibe persists right to the melodramatic ending, which also comes off as oddly emotionally flat.

jotix100 Can passion really die when a stormy love affair is over? That seems to be the question behind this 1981 French film, directed by Francois Truffaut. Having seen it when it was released originally, we had the opportunity to watch it recently when it was shown on a cable channel. Although we remembered the premise of the movie, watching for the second time did not have the same impact of the first time. The story is narrated from the point of view of an older woman, Madame Jouve, who had gone through the agonies of losing in love. Her ordeal ended in trying to commit suicide, the scars of which she is presently suffering from the injury she received on her leg that now slows her movements. Mme. Jouve tried to jump from an eighth floor of a building, almost killing herself.The action takes place on a small town near Grenoble. Bernard Coudray, an engineer, is living in a sort of idyllic suburban house. There is a sign on the house next door which advertises it is for rent. Bernard lives in what appears a happy environment with his wife, Arlette, and their young son. Bernard is surprised when he watches a moving van unload furniture. The house was finally rented.What Bernard does not realize is that he knows the woman moving into the place. She is Mathilde, a woman with whom he was involved in a passionate affair that ended badly. Her arrival means that whatever inner peace he had, will be shattered as he tries to pick up where he and Mathilde left off. The fact they were involved is never known by their present spouses. Mathilde is married to a flight controller, Philippe.As Arlette makes friends with her new neighbors, but one look between Bernard and Mathilde sets the stage for the passion that consumes them. The next thing is finding a place where to consummate what they feel about one another. It is impossible to hide what they feel for one another, something that is too obvious to hide. Mme. Jouve realizes what is going on right away, but Arlette and Philippe are totally blind about the affair.As all things of this nature, the lovers are doomed. Both lovers are now married to others; there is not much for them to do if they do not want to hurt their current spouses. A desperate Mathilde has a lot more to lose. Arlette is more forgiving about her husband's deceit. Philippe decides to make a clean break from the house that brought so much unhappiness, but it is too late. Mathilde has another thing in mind that will seal her destiny with Bernard."The Woman Next Door" by Francois Truffaut tells a passionate love story in which the director, clearly influenced by his idol Alfred Hitchcock, gives the audience a good love story with suspenseful undertones. Mr. Truffaut worked on the screenplay with his often collaborator, Suzanne Schiffman, and Jean Aurel, who had also worked with him. The idea of bringing two former lovers into such close environment is almost impossible to pull. In this case, the mere idea the cheated spouses did not have a hint what was going on in front of them, adds another layer to the narrative. Fanny Ardant's Mathilde is one of her best appearances in the French cinema. One can see her lust for a man that could have been hers, but things got in her way. Now seeing him again, she wants him, no matter what. Gerard Depardieu's Bernard does not quite come as inspired as some of his other roles, but he makes a credible lover and one can see how his desire for her never died. Veronique Silver is splendid as Mme. Jouve. Michelle Baumgartner and Henri Garcin are seen as Arlette and Philippe.

buff-29 Despite its distinguished provenance, and despite the presence of the stunning Fanny Ardant, this is pure soap. It even has a local busybody chattering background on the characters, a tested U.S. soap-opera technique. Gerard Depardieu is wooden and unconvincing as Ardant's lover. The rest of the cast (except for Ardant) is adequate at best. I don't think Truffault ever made a worse movie. It does exhibit his economy of expression and beautiful style, but nothing can save it from its own sentimentality and simple-mindedness. I don't believe this turkey has ever been in general release in the U.S., which should soften the hearts of even the most savage haters of the French. They did us the favor of keeping this one mostly to themselves.

MovieAddict2016 Bernard is happily married to his wife Arlette and has a son, Thomas. One day a new couple move in next door: Philippe and Mathilde, the latter of whom is a seductive woman with a secret -- she used to be Bernard's lover...I love Truffaut's films (of the ones I've seen, anyway) and when I approached this I had a genuine fear of disappointment -- it's one of his later films and I hadn't heard very much about it.I was surprised to find it's an excellent love story/character examination and better than it is generally given credit for. It's the typically tragic tale reminiscent of those we've seen before in cinema -- a French Romeo and Juliet.Gérard Depardieu and Fanny Ardant are perfect together and their chemistry sparks. They have the experience that indicates an older relationship; it's very believable, in other words.Roger Van Hool has a good role as Roland and the rest of the cast are superb as well. Overall this is a fascinating examination of love, marriage, romance, adultery, betrayal and life. In the hands of a master storyteller it is an almost flawless motion picture and certainly one of the best of the decade (one which, incidentally, is not known for producing many good pictures by most critics).