Cubussoli Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

Nayan Gough A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

Tony For so long watching a modern and future World filled with old industrial settings, you get the feeling it's trying too hard to be Orwellian. The care in the community centre of 1990 looks like an asylum from 2 or 3 decades previously. The future World isn't even a joke it's so awfully caricatured. I give it 4 as Arnie in Terminator showed his bum once, Bruce gets to do it 3 times until I stopped watching. It's stupid nonsense getting away with Sci - Fi label.

Thy Davideth I hated 12 Monkeys!!! I watched 2 hours of this crap and throughout it all there was NO resolution. Nothing!! Just some retard travelling through time to find out the source of the humanity's near extinction and ending with NOTHING!!! And all of you think this is such a brilliant film. Pssssshhhhh!!! Ha! The only thing this movie has going for it is the acting performances of Brad Pitt and Bruce Willis and that seems to be one of the highest consensus as to why this film is liked. I also liked some of the technological aspects of the movie as well. But the story, conception and plot is abysmal and the pacing is slow as hell. And I don't exactly get the message this movie is trying to bring, if there is any. 12 Monkeys is worthless in every way possible. 129 minutes of bull$#!+ with an idiotic conclusion. Blow my butt.

heffeque *Spoilers all over*The movie is fine. It's pretty interesting all over, but the fact that the ending is so badly written just makes me have to give it 2 stars.It made me real mad that the writer decided to end the movie the easy way: by making everyone suddenly non-intelligent beings.Everyone is suddenly non-intelligent and non-normal in the airport, even the security guy who asks to open a biological sample in the middle of the airport (that seems real normal, mister writer). Jose who I'm guessing went to have some coffee after giving Bruce Willis the gun because he seems to be OK with the bad guy running away. The woman who decided to stop trying to stop the wacko, and the rest of the people at the airport who don't seem to find strange that the guy running from Bruce Willis should be interrogated in any way. Somebody with biological material running from a guy with a gun who has just been shot: let's not raise any alarms, let's let him fly all around the world without questioning him first. That seems very normal and intelligent, yes sir. *Sigh*I'm extremely mad with the ending. What at first was a fine movie... just got ruined due to a really really stupid ending. It's insulting.What I really don't get is that barely nobody's complaining about the ending. Maybe the 2 stars I've given this movie is lower than it deserves, but I just see so many people reviewing this with nines and tens, that it baffles me.Characters are all believable and intelligent all the time... But suddenly really stupid at the end. To the point that I got really frustrated and angry.I'm repeating myself now a lot, but I think that nobody that is at least half-intelligent and has seen the ending can't have felt their intelligence insulted with it's finale. It could have been resolved much better while staying with the tragic ending.Sorry for the rant, but I just felt that I had to warn intelligent people that the ending might insult your intelligence.Really wanted to like this movie. What a shame.

zkonedog Currently, the topic of "time travel" is all the rage these days due to the incredible mind of JJ Abrams and a little show (you may have heard of it) called LOST. However, unless you hold a degree in quantum physics and can wrap your head around such concepts as Schrodinger's Cat or the Many-Worlds theory, the concepts that LOST throws around may be a bit overwhelming and a little frustrating. Fortunately, "12 Monkeys" provides what LOST cannot: a mind-bending time-travel plot that is both intellectually stimulating, yet easy enough to understand if one just pays close attention.The basic plot of the film centers on James Cole (Bruce Willis), a prisoner from "the future" (1997; where all surviving humans now live underground due to an apocalyptic event), who is sent back in time to try and gather information to prevent the catastrophe. While skipping through time, Cole meets two people, Dr. Railly (Madeleine Stowe) and mental patient Jeffrey Goines (Brad Pitt), who ultimately prove crucial to his mission of saving humanity from an underground existence.The brilliance of this film is that, although most time-travel plots are either overwhelming (LOST) or too simple (think Star Trek episodes), director Terry Gilliam manages to find the perfect mix. Upon completion of viewing, I was quite certain that I understood what had just transpired (a feat never to be overlooked when dealing with time-travel). Only after some auxiliary study did I begin to consider some alternate interpretations, none of which cheapen that original reaction in any way.The acting is also very solid, with Willis progressing the Cole character very nicely (from completely lost--like the viewers--to informed and ready for action), Pitt turning in a good show as the manic Goines, and Stowe portraying the "straight gal" who, like our minds, must be convinced that all of this is really happening.Thus, I would recommend "12 Monkeys" to any and all fans of science fiction, mystery, suspense, and action films for its ability to strike the right balance between mind-stimulating material and utter confusion. Plus, it is a film that can easily be viewed multiple times, as little tidbits can be picked up each time through.