Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Fluentiama Perfect cast and a good story

Ogosmith Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Patience Watson One of those movie experiences that is so good it makes you realize you've been grading everything else on a curve.

Bob Taylor The beginning is great: Violette is living with Maurice Sachs in a Normandy backwater in 1942. With the war on, life is precarious for the budding writer; she is forced to go on the black market to deal in the essentials of life. Sachs obliges her to sit down and write about her childhood and youth, as a way to bring in some extra cash. Soon Sachs is off to Germany as a labourer (he hoped to ingratiate himself with the Nazis by hiding his Jewish past). Sachs dies, and Violette is off to Paris as soon as she can manage it. Soon she meets Simone de Beauvoir, Jean Genet and Jacques Guerin (who becomes her first publisher). She starts to travel, something a girl from a poor family usually doesn't get to do. Finally she becomes a member of the Gallimard stable of writers; fame and some fortune are hers at last.Emmanuelle Devos impressed me very much with her tenacity in bad times and her masochistic devotion to Beauvoir. Sandrine Kiberlain, reed-thin and erect of bearing, looked and sounded very much like Beauvoir. Olivier Py as the sleazy Sachs stole all his scenes.

secondtake Violette (2013)Violette Leduc was a French novelist who approached female sensual and sexual subjects, including lesbian affairs, with fresh and original directness. This is one story of her life. portrayed as largely tormented and often filled with a sense of hopelessness. Her writing and her love life was constantly ravaged.But this all happens in beautiful France, so the movie is a gorgeous meandering journey through the 20th Century in pastel, gloomy, golden, timeless countryside. And in the end, for those who care about the real woman, she overcomes. Her death to breast cancer (not in the movie) is just the sad inevitable darkness that seemed to follow her even during the brightness of a great and daring mind.There is no strong narrative propulsion here, for sure. To like this you'll have to enjoy lingering, and sometime in zones of brown melancholy. I did like that, and liked all of the movie, even if I found myself physically restless, too. I can't see how it could have been done differently, but it's good to have poetic patience (or patience for poetry). The acting, it must be emphasized, is vivid and raw in a modernist way not far from the many bits of text taken from Leduc's writing. Emmanuelle Davos makes no compromise in her showing both the deeply unhappy and the hopeful sides of this woman. And Sandrine Kaberlain is a severe and knowing Simone de Beauvoir, the famous author who comes again and again to Leduc's aid. The implied love affair, fractured and incomplete, between these two is an important if somewhat thinly sketched part of the larger picture for the title character.This is all moving, great stuff. There is an echo (or a harbinger) of another pair of women drawn with artistry and love in a recent movie, "Reaching for the Moon" (which I liked a lot). But such a different ambiance here, all dank and fearful with shafts of sunlight only sometimes felt. I recommend them both, but this one will require slowing down and appreciating the mood as much as the details of this intense, ordinary biography.

dipesh parmar Martin Provost's new film 'Violette' charts the professional life of French writer Violette Leduc (Emmanuelle Devos), who rose to fame in the middle of the 20th century.Leduc caught the attention of publisher Simone de Beauvoir (Sandrine Kiberlain), who published her story. But this was just the beginning of Leduc's long struggle for success, acceptance, and most of all friendship and companionship. She's not an easy person to like, constantly berating herself over her appearance, her writing, and questioning her motives for staying alive. Unwanted as a child, Leduc's insecurity and destructiveness is laid bare for all to see in a time when women had few rights. Her writing is raw, exploring subjects such as abortion and sexuality in ways previously unheard of in French society.Simone de Beauvoir keeps encouraging Leduc to right all her wrongs through writing, and their relationship is the anchor for this film. She introduces her to a distinguished group of intellectuals which include Camus, Sartre, Genet, and the rich benefactor Jacques Guerin (Olivier Gourmet). But regardless of her associations, Leduc eventually shuns them all. De Beauvoir is the only relationship Leduc has managed to sustain, but its ultimately a relationship of intimate rejections.Devos and Kiberlain excel as this most unlikely of pairings. As much as this film is about their relationship, ultimately it is about the torment in Leduc from repeated abuse and rejection. It was through her writing that Leduc finally understood life, where her preoccupation of the perception of others of herself eventually diminishing, replaced by her observations of them and channelled through her writing.

ferdinand1932 The first thing that impresses is that this film is written very well. The structure is quite novelistic, separated into chapters and each part moving the story along in well paced increments. The whole movie starts quite slowly, mysteriously and then opens out, that is a pleasing form as it adds layers to the work.The second thing is that both Kiberlain and Devos are outstanding. Devos takes this role of Violette and makes it completely human. She is a dozen conflicted people and all the time in need of many things but most of all, in need of love. As de Beauvoir, Kiberlain is magisterial. She has de Beauvoir's haughtiness, her brilliance, her perfect sense of her own destiny.The relationship between the women of such different circumstances is told with grace and balance and insight.The photography and choice of locales is good too. The sense of place is considered, from the cold farm in winter, through to freezing Paris and then the Midi in summer at the end. Some shots may linger, because it can look so good on the screen, but that remark apart there is little to fault here.Recommended for all its best virtues.