IslandGuru Who payed the critics

Portia Hilton Blistering performances.

Asad Almond A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

Freeman This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

trashgang Okay, this isn't going to be a gem but for me it did still offer some nasty moments. The story is rather simple, girl being kidnapped and raped, she escapes somehow and is out for revenge. I was surprised that the rating was so low.If you want to see a typical Hollywood blockbuster forget it because it shows that it was a low budget flick. It take a while before things go wrong and it's only once the girl is out for revenge that it becomes a brutal flick and people could get offended by some torturing done by her. Clocking in under 90 minutes makes it worth the trip to see it. As said before, there are moments that will make you grab the remote but the effects are really well done which makes it a delight for the geeks of nasty brutal revenge flicks.Gore 1,5/5 Nudity 1/5 Effects 2,5/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5

tiskeith If you are in the mood to watch a really awful movie, this is it! Once in a while we find ourselves not wanting to watch a really good move or thriller so we settle for mediocre just to get to sleep or see how terrible a movie can be. I have to say this is the typical Terrible horrible. I never yell at the screen with a good horror movie, but this was down right stupid. To summarize the entire movie. The beginning is useless and serves no purpose in the plot what so ever. Female gets captured, raped. Oh yeah! She escapes, but then can't climb a fence next to a busy road. So she is caught again. Then she gets raped again then escapes again....well she passes out in the small Forrest to wake up and head to the lake instead of heading to the road...??? Anyways typically idiotic revenge from here on out. I am actually writing the review while the rest of this movie is playing out. Enjoy!!

A_Different_Drummer Reviewers Notes: 1. Yet another torture porn in the grand tradition of films like I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE and LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT. Seen one, seen em all.2. The date stamp says 2015 which is actually the creepiest thing in the movie (among many many creepy things) because the settings, the direction, the cinematography, the script, the acting, all of them scream 1974. Which raises the question, why would anyone want to do a film in 2015 that is completely indistinguishable from similar stuff shot about a half-century ago?? 3. The only other thing worth mentioning is the "tease" scene off the top where the kidnapper/abductor tells his fellow kidnapper/abductor that he wants to try "something different" with the new girl, he wants to make her "love" him. And for a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a second, the poor viewer (any viewer watching this film is automatically in deep distress, hence the adjective) might think that the producers and writers did this film because they have something new and different to add to the genre. But then the moment quickly passes, and you realize they do not.

Taylor Frazier Agree with the only other reviewer below and hopefully the only other person who's ever seen this movie besides me. Every single one of these movies are the same -- innocent girl gets kidnapped and brutally raped by psychopaths, one of whom is stereo-typically mentally retarded, and then eventually she gets revenge in the end and the movie ends. Boring as hell with terrible acting and no unique twists.And enough already with the so called "shock value" of these types of movies. We've seen it all before. Many times in fact. There's really no point in doing a movie like this anymore unless you're going to really change things up. And this movie certainly doesn't even attempt to do that. Dumb plot, dumb actors, dumb movie. Pass.