Perry Kate
Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
Lela
The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.
Yazmin
Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.
Lars Lendale
***************** SPOILERS **************If you're 14 years old and you've never seen a softcore porn movie on your own before, then that might be the only exception to this condition for liking this movie.That movie is a copy of the first one, yet it manages to be boring and mediocre. Same plot twists, same concept, same town, same school. How can they do that in the same school ? !A ton of plot holes, a ton of events that are not possible - such as Britney not getting caught, who's in charge of laundering the money ? Because it's only a company check, so who's in charge of wiring the money to an account ? Hw can Britney use this money if the company check is signed to Maya ? How can Britney pay off a tenant of a aerodrome without any money on her account ? How can the police not investigate on the missing Julian Hayes ? How can the police not check that Britney checked out exactly at the same aerodrome Niles crashed the plane ? How can Bridge come to the conclusion that the girls murdered Hayes ? How can Britney have nightmares of her mother's suicide when she is actually still alive ? A sequel as uninspired as this, is unacceptable. The cast is a TV second tier actors, the girls are hot but they hardly ever show much of their bodies, the sex scenes are laughable with doubles, a real rip offs. Seriously this is 2004 and you come up with the exact same erotic scene ? Wow, a real rip-offs, a few kisses here and there, a guy in his boxer shorts, what is this ? The only performance worth mentioning is Washington. Other than that, very forgettable movie.
BA_Harrison
Wild Things 2 isn't a sequel; it's a cheap emulation, an imperfect carbon-copy that takes nearly all of the elements from the first film and simply replays them with a slightly modified script and a different (ie., less memorable) cast. As in the original, the noir-style plot revolves around a group of morally bankrupt characters out to get rich any way they can, meaning that double-crosses, murder, and sex are once again the order of the day, all of which leaves the viewer with a very strong feeling of deja-vu.Bisexual rich girl/poor girl combo: it's there! Gratuitous threesome scene: it's there! Sexy pool scene: it's there! Inquisitive detective: he's there! Further plot explanations during the end credits: you guessed it... it's all bloody there, with zero effort made to add anything new. The no-name cast do their best with the regurgitated material, and the girls are plenty hot enough to make matters easy to endure, but at the end of the day, this is nothing more than an unimaginative cash-in that really didn't need to be made.5/10 for all the lesbian snogging and boobs and stuff, but that's being generous.
tysonhollen
I thought this movie was going to be different than the original one but it seems to be a cheesy B-List copy in almost every way.It contains the same plot as the first Wild Things.The actors and the characters they play look like,act and talk almost identical to the characters in the original.They chose Susan Ward for the Denise Richards spoiled-rich girl role because she looks like Richards.They chose Joe Michael Burke for the Matt Dillion town-respected city worker role because he looks like Dillion and they chose Linden Ashby for the Kevin Bacon obsessed cop role because he looks like Bacon.The only difference between this one and the original is that in this one the rich girl gets the money and the poor girl dies,where a in the first movie the poor girl gets the cash and the rich girl dies.This movie is very predictable after the first fifteen minutes. Calling this piece of trash a great flick is blasphemy.I only rent this one when I can't find anything else to rent. My advice is go and rent the original not this one or wild things 3 either.
domino1003
There are a lot of things in common with this movie to the first one:sex, greed and murder in Blue Bay. Considered a sequel, it really isn't, because none of the characters from the first film appear in any shape or form in this home video version (Although one actor from the first film is playing a totally different character in this one).Brittney Havers (Susan Ward)is the step-daughter of Niles Dunlap (Anthony John Denison, famous for his villainous role in the 80's TV show "Crime Story"), an incredibly wealthy guy. Brittney's mother married into money, but killed herself in a car accident. Brittney is of course popular, but Maya King (Leila Arcieri)REALLY can't stand her, calling her "trailer trash" and other ugly things.Their feud starts to take a really ugly turn when Brittney's stepfather dies in a plane crash. Brittney finds out that she will only receive $25,000/year from her father's $70 million estate because only a blood heir of Dunlap's can claim the full amount. Then things get really ugly when Maya claims that she is Dunlap's illegitimate daughter. Meanwhile, Terance Bridge, an insurance investigator (Isiah Washington)begins to smell something fishy with the goings on in Blue Bay...and it's not the swamp.Anyone who has seen the first film of the series (And yes, there is a third one out as well)can figure out the twists and turns a mile away. Lots of plot devices are recycled from the first film (Including some sex scenes). However, the film still makes for a good watch. If you're in the mood for some trash, then give this film a peek.