Huievest
Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.
HottWwjdIam
There is just so much movie here. For some it may be too much. But in the same secretly sarcastic way most telemarketers say the phrase, the title of this one is particularly apt.
Marva-nova
Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.
Janis
One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.
ksf-2
Great documentary on Churchill. Covers the early years of Churchill up to where he meets with FDR in the US. Interesting interviews with Churchill offspring, as well as other, unrelated historians. Was kind of a Patton figure -- Damn the torpedoes, straight ahead kind of guy. Knew he was above getting injured in the line of duty, even while bombs are falling around them! lots of black and white footage of the evacuation of Dunkirk (they spent a LOT of time on that chapter... must have been special interest to the writers.) Churchill's rise, the military strategies, and right up to where he goes to America to convince us to join in. Its pretty widely believed Britain (and the U.S.) would probably both be toast if the USA didn't get involved in a big way. Narrated by Ben Kingsley, who has been in some GREAT films in his own right. This film highlights the repeated hesitation of A.H. to forge ahead; they were certainly spread pretty thin by this time, so I guess one has to pick their battles. Great watch. Currently showing on netflix. The director, Richard Trank, had won an Oscar for "The Long Way Home" back in 1998. Catch this Churchill time-line if you can... its a good one.
drcnry
This documentary presents a lot of new information for me.Not mentioned during the discussion of the RAF's success against the Luftwaffe is how the Chain Home early warning radar system enabled an outnumbered British air defense to succeed in spite of Germany's advantage.A prevalent message in this film is Churchill's horror at the Holocaust; by early 1942, he knew 1.5 million Jews (no. cited in the film) had been killed by the SS in Eastern Europe.Unfortunately, history indicates the Allies did very little during the War to stop the slaughter or to save and absorb refugees. This leads me to question the accuracy of this presentation. How was this reflected in Churchill's policies? Did he publicize what he discovered? How much did FDR know and, paraphrasing Mr. Baker, when did he know it? Interestingly, the only relevant mention in Wikipedia's Winston Churchill page indicates the opposite: "A newspaper article penned by Churchill and published on 4 February 1920, had warned that civilization was threatened by the Bolsheviks, a movement which he linked through historical precedence to Jewish conspiracy. He wrote in part: 'This movement among Jews is not new ... but a 'world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality." (http://bit.ly/1OulRZl) Ugly.
MartinHafer
Winston Churchill was a great man...perhaps the best of the 20th century. Because he was such an important figure and did so much, I was very impressed by this documentary about Churchill's war years. This is because it has an amazingly rousing musical score--one worthy of a man of such greatness. This, combined with lovely narration by Ben Kingsley, made this film a pleasure to watch. However, one thing you should be aware of--the film ONLY covers the period from 1939 to the US entry into WWII in December, 1941! So, anyone looking for a complete look at the man should look elsewhere OR harass the makers of this film until they make more films about the life of this remarkable man (I am for the latter....but harass is perhaps a big too strong a word--just encourage them). The bottom line is that this is a great film...and it sure left me wanting more.