Skunkyrate
Gripping story with well-crafted characters
ActuallyGlimmer
The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.
Hadrina
The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful
Robert Joyner
The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one
BA_Harrison
You might think that a film this weak would be the kiss of death for any horror franchise, but not the Witchcraft series: despite Part III being yet another utterly unmemorable example of cheap and nasty straight to video crud, the films just kept on coming (there's sixteen of them to date!).I might be a bit sketchy about the details of this one since I struggled to stay awake, but I seem to recall that son of a witch William (Charles Solomon Jr.) is now a defense attorney, trying to prevent the innocent from being sent to death row. When evil warlock Louis (Domonic Luciana) gets between William and his big-breasted girlfriend Charlotte (Lisa Toothman), the lawyer must use his supernatural powers to fight back.As with the previous two Witchcraft films, the production values are very low, the acting is pitiful, and the plot is completely unremarkable. Director Rachel Feldman tries to keep punters happy with a spot of soft-core sex and some gratuitous nudity, but even that proves boring. Unless you happen to be a movie masochist like myself, you would probably be better off giving this one a miss.
Dr. Gore
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*I bought this video for two bucks. I'm not going to mix words. "Witchcraft III" stinks. It's boring, pointless, stupid, etc. Please feel free to add your own negative adjective. Whatever word you choose, you'll be pretty close to the mark in describing this one.I was hoping "Witchcraft III" was going to be a typical softcore horror flick. Maybe even a little better than typical. Well, it was pretty typical. Typical bad movie. Some Demonic male model attacks women by giving them the Kiss of Death and sucking some cheap special effects out of them. There's a little sex and nudity near the end but it was too late to save the movie. It got the Kiss of Death and landed in my garbage can.If you want a good softcore flick with some witchcraft thrown in, check out "Sorceress" with Julie Strain. You can't go wrong.
pumaye
The third entry in the Witchcraft series is a mediocre attempt at softcore horror. sure, you have several nice looking (a couple of them even gorgeous, like Lisa Toothman) women that you may find naked a lot and possibly even involved in various sexual activities (like the usual shower scene), but the plot is feeble at most (you have a sort of male sorceror drinker of soul to keep his fiancee alive forever and the lead good character as the defender of Goodness and of the integrity of his lover) and the acting is always amateurish at best. Yes, probably the previous title in the series is worst, but you may certainly find several better softcore horror movies out there.
bigpappa1--2
A good warlock fights for the love of a woman against an evil warlock. The story is thinly disguised as a horror film, and not a very good one at that. Slightly better than the first two, but not by much. Most of the female cast members are terrific looking, and are frequently naked. 2 out of 10.
