Matcollis This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

FirstWitch A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

Phillida Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

Phillipa Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

jaylun This movie is bad-painfully so. Writing, acting, the whole nine yards is bad. Which is EXACTLY why I watched this movie! The sparse nudity is not enough to carry you through this stinky piece of cheese. I have to admit that characters are developed enough so you actually get concerned with a few of their fates, but this is a multi-tasker-you can do something else while watching it and not miss anything. I would recommend watching this with friends. Get some popcorn and a group and let the comments fly. Almost everything in this movie has been done before, so there really are no surprises. That is the problem for new zombie movie directors and writers, they need to come up with a hook to spin the 'accepted' lore to create new interest.

ZomComGod Sorry people - it didn't do it for me. I kept comparing it to Zombie Strippers. The plot was weak, it tried hard, but it was weak; although the idea that injecting yourself with the 'antidote' and feeding yourself to the zombies is quite clever, I will give the writer that. The very beginning of the film was clever, it made me look forward to the rest of the film - I was disappointed though. The sets were clearly fake too.The sound quality was poor and inconsistent. And the gore/blood was clearly pink paint and fake (I know, it's a zombie film and it's never going to be 100% real.) It just didn't work for me. Just like ZS, this film was centered around a strip club; however unlike ZS, the 'strippers' in ZZZ spent more time talking about their mums and boyfriends, arguing and getting slapped by their over-the-top pimp than they did actually stripping - for the record, I'm not that shallow, it is just expected from a stripper-based Zomcom. For a low budget film (especially one with a budget as low as this) it did the job, I watched it from start to finish and did enjoy it, but it wasn't how I expected; especially after watching ZS prior. Poor acting, poor effects, poor plot and poor film I'm afraid. Sorry.

Anthony Pittore III (Shattered_Wake) After a mishap with a new drug, the experiment's subjects (aka 'victims') turn into ravenous flesh-eating zombies. Locked up in a strip club, a group of exotic dancers must fight for their lives against the horde of undead or fall victim to the infectious bite of the rotting ghouls.Rookie director Jason Murphy brings another installment in the 'Undead Exotic Dancer' subsubgenre (being released just before Zombie Strippers! (2008)) with his film Zombies! Zombies! Zombies!. While I wasn't such a fan of the mildly entertaining Zombie Strippers!, I thought I would give this one a look to help viewers choose which Naked Flesheaters (title for the next one?) were more worth the watch. When it comes down to it, this film doesn't have to work very hard to please me. Horror-comedies make up a good amount of my favourite films (from Freaked to Shaun of the Dead, I'll take 'em all). Toss in zombies (the best subgenre in horror) and naked, blood-soaked women and you've got it made. Zombie Strippers! failed, for me, because it tried too hard without the ability to attain what it wanted to be. Had it simply take itself less seriously, it would've been more enjoyable. Luckily, Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! knew how to take itself for what it was: A fun, light-hearted zombie romp through a gentleman's club. The opening scene alone, while not technically part of the film itself, is one of the funniest scenes I've ever seen in a horror film. It ranks up there with Nic Cage in a bear costume (though this one was intentionally hilarious). As a $200,000 budget would suggest, there are some pretty obvious problems. Most notably, the audio/video quality is very cheap. The sound ranges from ear-piercing to muffled and can get annoying. Also, the cheap shot-on-video look is something that has been putting off a lot of horror fans from modern low-budget cinema. It's something that needs to be looked past, however, in order to enjoy a film like this. It is helped, however, that the poor video quality is showing someone like Lyanna Tumaneng (who plays Dallas Skye). Beyond the a/v problems, the rest of the problems of low-budget film-making show, but the filmmakers knew how to utilize them in a way that makes them funny enough to laugh WITH instead of laugh AT. That's really what makes the film worth it. . . it knows it's bad, and it takes advantage of that. If cheesy schlock isn't for you, then neither is this film.Final verdict: 5.5/10 – Averaged from an 8/10 for entertainment and a 3/10 as a film.-AP3-

HanktheHobo I'll make this short and sweet.People that gave this 1 star need to watch more movies.That being said, this is an average low-budget flick. The special effects are below par, relying heavily on very poor CGI, especially towards the end. There are some decent "low-tech" effects scattered throughout.Also, it is shot in HD and not on film, which only makes it look cheaper.The acting is a mixed bag with some really good acting and some really bad acting, but mostly the acting is average.The writing is quite good, which is refreshing for a low-budget zombie movie. It seems like the writers actually bothered to come up with some plot twists of their own, which is uncommon for the ridiculously derivative zombie genre. Even if some of their ideas didn't pan out so well in the film, they still get points for not just puking out the same mind-numbing crap you usually get with these kind of movies.The characters are well-developed and actually seem like real people.Overall, worth a rent if you have some time to kill, but I wouldn't buy it.