Harikleia Harikleia
I read and enjoyed all the Agatha Christies when I was a teenager. Despite this I love these adaptions, and I enjoy the new twists we get in the screenplays.I have to say that Geraldine McEwan for me is the consummate Miss Marple, as envisaged by Agatha Christie, managing to combine the ideas of sweet little old lady, knitting pink woollies for babies, with intelligence, humour and determination. 'Just passing were you, Miss Marple?' 'Oh, Mr Burton!'Julia McKenzie is not nearly as successful - have you noticed that her garb is far more severe, with jackets, stiff collars and plain hats rather than the cardigans, and flowery hats of McEwen? Even Joan Hickson, in the earlier series filmed in the 80s and early 90s, does not match EcEwan for authenticity.
pirslya
well, I haven't really read any books of Agatha Christie (except The Death on the Nile) and as a viewer, I found this series so enjoyable! and my favorite Miss Marple is Geraldine McEwan because i thought she amused me kind of sad she didn't continue but it's understandable! when the plot was sometimes didn't really work on me, I thought it's something that made me want to watch it more and ended up wanting to watch more. It's one of the first British TV series that I watched, and it's something that I wouldn't regret. Ms. Marple is such an unique and authentic character, and it's kind of unfortunate she didn't as popular as Poirot.
TheLittleSongbird
As a big Agatha Christie fan, whenever a new Marple is on regardless of any initial dubiousness I never miss it. The ITV Marple series does have some good entertainment value and is not as bad as it has often been dismissed as, it is well made, has good acting on the whole and is fun. But it is also very difficult to rate, because the adaptations are a very mixed bag quality-wise. And this has little to do with infidelity to the books(which is the biggest and most common criticism of the series), even as a fan of Christie I have always been a firm believer of judging adaptations on their own terms as long as it doesn't feel dull and makes sense.Admittedly some of the adaptations do not fare well with some of the changes made, the worst case being the ending of Body in the Library, still absurd even when you haven't read of the book, this viewer has, my parents hadn't and were pretty dumbfounded to the final solution of that one. Sleeping Murder also would have benefited much better if the incredibly haunting ending of the book was maintained rather than the Poirot-like denouncement that the adaptation had, the excellent Joan Hickson adaptation had it and it was done brilliantly, why wasn't it here(trying to solve the problem of having too many characters is my bet)? And then there's At Bertram's Hotel that if you took the period detail, Miss Marple and that it was a mystery drama you could have sworn it wasn't Agatha Christie.But some of the adaptations that really disappointed did so on their own terms. Sittaford Mystery did have good production values and acting but it was very difficult to get into when the mystery didn't really ever come to life with a first half that took forever to get going. Why Didn't They Ask Evans?(Secret of Chimneys to a lesser extent too) had a different problem in that it was incredibly convoluted(even when watching it again since reviewing the adaptation the ending made little sense at all). At Bertram's Hotel manages to be both, as well as being far too broad, with perhaps Nemesis also faring the same. The adaptations that added Miss Marple into the story also had a mixed effect, Towards Zero incorporated her quite well but Why Didn't They Ask Evans? for example had her too much into the background.The Marple adaptations for all the problems they have are not to be dismissed entirely. Because there are some faithful adaptations out there like A Caribbean Mystery and The Mirror Crack'd From Side to Side(both better than the Hickson adaptations), and the third murder in A Caribbean Mystery works much better in the later adaptation than in the book and Hickson version where the murder was rather too much by chance. Some might find the exploration of Miss Marple's early life overwrought in Murder at the Vicarage, I thought it was genuinely touching. The Blue Geranium, A Pocketful of Rye and The Mirror Crack'd were really excellent as adaptations and on their own merits, A Murder is Announced is very good too. And while it did get confused and had too much padding at times, though it did keep to the core of both stories remarkably, Greenshaw's Folly was a brave attempt at merging two short series into one big one, doing it far better than the Poirot(a far more consistent series) adaptation of The Labours of Hercules. The series is well made, the locations and scenery from stately homes to more picturesque locations are stunning while the photography is pretty and atmospheric and the costumes are evocative and well-tailored.Good also is the music, the theme tune is catchy but can get overused like in the early Geraldine McEwan adaptations. The background music and snippets of music from the period fare very well. The scripting- though Sittaford Mystery and At Bertram's Hotel in particular are exceptions, stilted and underwritten- does have some nice doses of humour and has the right amount of intrigue, generally making an effort to make the mystery make sense. The stories come from truly great source material(A Murder is Announced is an example of Christie at her best like The Murder of Roger Ackroyd and And Then There Were None) and they are mostly compelling and fun to see unfold, with some suspenseful and humorous parts. Geraldine McEwan and Julie McKenzie fare nicely as Miss Marple. I do have a preference to McKenzie(whose adaptations are more consistent) who has more charm and more of a twinkle, McEwan is always knowing, appealingly spunky and steely and makes the most of her screen time but can have a tendency to be over eager. Neither to me are as good as Joan Hickson who IS Miss Marple.Most of the support acting is good, Zoe Wannamaker, Sharon Small, Lindsey Duncan, Timothy Dalton, Derek Jacobi, Jane Asher and Fiona Shaw very good(I'd go so far to say Small and Duncan were revelations), while Harry Enfield, Allan Davies and Elaine Page worked surprisingly well. There are exceptions however with some over-acting(Warren Clarke, Samantha Bond, Joanna Lumley, Shirley Henderson, Catherine Tate), under-acting(Freddie Fox, Jonas Armstrong) and a few wastes(Richard Briers, Jane Seymour- she was still quite good it was screen time really-, Joanna David). So all in all, very difficult to rate seeing how mixed the adaptations are- hence the lack of a rating- with a lot of good things and a lot of problems. Bethany Cox
veronicammartin
I don't like the Geraldine McEwan series because of the changes that are made to cater to modern ideals don't fit into the era in which the books are written.In this series, so many of these books are changed to have homosexual TV characters which had they been modern stories would be permissible but they are n't modern stories. These are 1930's - 1950s stories and the characters aren't even in the books. Some of the TV stories are just completely changed by this. In fact, My friends renamed 'The Body in the library' as 'The lesbians in the library' ! The Sittaford Mystery suddenly has the two women go off together to Argentina! Why add this when it isn't even in the books? Agatha Christie is superb and can stand alone without any character and plot changes . Leave these stories how they were meant to be, how they were actually written. Don't introduce or change the sexuality of characters to cater for modern viewers.It changes the feel of the book.Awful.
