Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

Keeley Coleman The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

Bob OK, let's be real here people. We all had those days were we come home from Applebee's, turn on the TV, break out the happy snacks, and BINGE WATCH A BUNCH OF IDIOTS DOING CRAP ON AMERICA'S STUPIDEST HOME VIDEOS..... Or is that just me? Either way, THAT'S NOT THE POINT.When it comes to American TV shows, AFV is your usual, standard, ordinary, customary, conventional, habitual, accustomed, expected, wonted, typical, stock, common, everyday, regular, routine, established, set, fixed, traditional, time-honored American show. But is this a bad thing? Well, technically not. In fact, I've gotten a few good laughs from this show. Plus, I find the entire concept of people submitting their idiotic home videos to be aired on national TV for a chance to win a good amount of cash pretty cool.Yeah, that's great. But why the BALLS did I give AFV a 5/10? It's when they announce the FRICKIN' winner. WHY does the WINNER have to be some RANDOM BABY or some RANDOM KID under 10 YEARS OLD? WHAT THE FART PEOPLE? Whenever AFV airs a video that focuses on a baby or some kid under 10 years old, 95% of the time it's not funny, IT'S JUST RETARDED. YOU SHOULDN'T BE GIVING MONEY TO THESE PEOPLE.And the worst part would be the fact that AFV is FULL OF THESE KINDS OF VIDEOS. Nobody wants to see your FRICKIN' baby or your FRICKIN' kid do CRAP. We want to see people who are 18 and over do POINTLESS (yet humorous) STUNTS that result in DESTRUCTION or EVEN PET VIDEOS. Yeah, I guess PET VIDEOS ARE GOOD TOO.I give this a FRICKIN' 5/10. I HATE KIDS.

David Black Tom Bergeron is my least favorite person. If Tom Bergeron, Hitler, and Osama Bin Laden were in the same room and I had a gun with 2 bullets, I'd shoot Tom Bergeron twice. The man is paid to speak puns. Terrible puns that even the eldest of grandmothers would not dare speak to their grandchildren, either out of compassion or fear of the scorn and rejection they'd receive from their family. 1 out of every 100 videos featured on this television spectacle of garbage could be considered funny by the average person. The rest are filled with pain, misery, or non-events.If you enjoy sitting down for an evening to watch a pathetic hack old man pander to the outdated idea of family humor by doing terrible voice-overs and repeating dry humorless punchlines to people getting hurt ad nauseam, then I implore you to find the nearest toilet and drown yourself in it.There was probably a point in time where this show was relevant, maybe even good. Now it serves as an awful televised version of youtube, where you cannot choose what you watch, everything is terrible, and your stroke survivor grandpa is making commentary about everything that happens in a desperate attempt to be funny over your shoulder. I would like this to be cancelled, so the money can be used for better things, such as sewage management or the production of crossword puzzles.

elshikh4 I knew lately that it was an old idea which came out at the end of the 1970s. I bet this taste of realism wasn't needed back then. However after getting saturated out of too many beautiful and glossy worlds, the call for that idea was on.It's 2 shows already. Firstly the days of (Bob Saget). OH MY GOD. This was historically funny. It had such a brilliant spirit. The introductions of the videos were so smartly written. (Saget) is one of the finest hosts I have ever watched. His commentaries during the video were incredibly creative and hilarious. The choices of the videos were mostly decent. And the musical montages couldn't be better, being a classic TV indeed.Then, the doomsday suddenly started. (Saget) vanished, along with all the brilliance too. And (Tom Bergeron) came in. Another OH MY GOD, yet in totally different sense !(Bergeron) is sorrowfully not only lesser, but untalented in the first place. The introductions became something to avoid. (Bergeron)'s commentaries during the videos are just silly. Actually listing to that very dry writing resembled eating sands. Even the shown material has gone weirdly bad. The show's intention transformed from lovely to emetic. Its comedy inclined to; farts, urine, etc (the 1990s and 2000s filth). The winning videos are disastrous. Hence the assured final result is : unfunny, or worse; alleging to be funny. And instead of being always enjoyed out of watching it, I come to be always regretted !So from no realism, to yes realism but nice, to yes realism but nasty. See how you can read the history of TV through this show. The problem is that in the nasty phase it lost the decency along with the knack and the laughs as well. If you're interested in watching farts, urine, and the like, then go to any dirty public toilet and live there for the time you want. And if you're interested in laughing then watch the first seasons and forget the rest. I still can't believe they're one show !

ptway I have watched your show for years and enjoyed it. However, last night a segment showed a young boy encouraged by an adult to put his pet white mouse on top of a cage outdoors. Suddenly a bird of prey swooped down and flew off with the mouse. The audience and the host laughed and the host made a comment about grace before mealtime. I was so shocked at the inhumane, insensitive attitude of your host and the audience, who is always affected by the behavior of the host,I'm sending letters about this to PETA, ASPCA & Bob Barker hoping they will take action. Another program about America's Funniest Animals requests no videos showing harm to animals be sent. How different their standard is from yours! We all know life exists at the expense of other life but to encourage a youngster to "feed" his mouse to a bird of prey, even accidentally, and then laugh about it teaches him to be insensitive to life in general. Margaret Mead once said the most dangerous thing you can do to a child is let it get away with torturing an animal. This certainly falls in that category. As an Anthropologist I'm concerned about this and our culture as a result of your program.