Smartorhypo
Highly Overrated But Still Good
Tacticalin
An absolute waste of money
Hulkeasexo
it is the rare 'crazy' movie that actually has something to say.
Kimball
Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.
studioAT
There are some shows that people really want to return, but know that she probably shouldn't come back as they'll be pale imitations of the original version.This remake (or continuation) of 'Minder' is a good example of this.It's not bad actually, but it suffers hugely in comparison to the original show.Shane Richie does well, but his character is basically just Alfie Moon (his Eastenders character) under another name.Crucially the writing isn't great, and the plots aren't the best.It's a noble effort, but it just didn't capture the public's imagination in the same way as the original.
andrew jones
This is as bad as it gets. I enjoyed the original Minder and have reviewed that as well.I don't know what was going through peoples minds here?Shane Richie should get it into his head once and for all,that he is a grubby soap opera actor and nothing more. Every other project he does falls flat on its face and he can not act in any great way. A friend of mine who for some reason watches "Eastenders" told me that Richie has now made the character he plays sound like he has got a speech impediment.No one wonder they pulled the plug on this drivel so quickly. Awful in so many ways.
J_Cheever_Loophole
I've never liked Shane Ritchie so I wasn't expecting to like this Minder re-make. But, actually, he's quite good in the role. It may not be as good as the original but they've done well by not making it too similar.The plots aren't brilliant but this is light entertainment, and doesn't need to be too closely scrutinised. The main characters are likable and sufficiently different from 'Tel' and 'Arthur' that comparisons aren't a big problem. And the 'Minder' in this series isn't quite such a pushover for Archie Daley as Terry was for Arthur. The episodes also got stronger as the characters developed.All in all, a reasonable hours entertainment that doesn't require too much concentration. You need to give it a chance and watch a few episodes.
crawfrordboon
While the 21st Century version of the classic 80s comedy-drama 'Minder' was always going to have a lot to live up to, the first episodes gives cause for optimism.There was outcry amongst fans when TV personality and sometime TV presenter Shane Ritchie was cast as Archie Daley, nephew of the infamous Arthur, but while Ritchie is not much of an actor, he gets an 'A' for effort here. If anything, he should tone down his 'cheekie-chappie' enthusiasm, in favour of portraying a veneer of reputability, but, as the series will take time to hit its stride so will Ritchie.The plot exists to be disregarded - an entirely nebulous storyline fulfilled its purposes of introducing us to the principals, via a series of non-descript villains. While Petra (who I take to be a relative of the gravel-voiced Dave, proprietor of the Winchester Club in the George Cole original) is a spirited character and looks set to be a series regular, it was Lex Shrapnel who gave the standout performance. Carrying the show with an understated hard edge and an air of seen-it-all-before weariness, he already seems as able a Minder as either Dennis Waterman or Gary Webster.It was during the commercials that I stumbled across Waterman on the other side, and while I thought I would be pining for his gravelly tones and acknowledge considerable presence, I feel that the show, in its infancy, will survive without him.