GamerTab That was an excellent one.

Sharkflei Your blood may run cold, but you now find yourself pinioned to the story.

Siflutter It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

Helllins It is both painfully honest and laugh-out-loud funny at the same time.

momosity I'm getting sick of these filmmakers who leave things up in the air or offscreen or just decide the "let the viewers make up their own ending". Excuse me, but if I wanted to make my own ending I'd turn it off before the end!}What a waste of talent.

con_au Knowing that this was a piece of Soderbergh experimentation, with a companion app allowing the viewer/player to do a 'choose your own adventure' plot line, I was intrigued to find out how the tv version would render with its forced plot line. The answer is - very very badly. Fans of Soderbergh's styling will be rewarded, but the limits of time and the impossibility to explore multiple plot directions hacks the screen version to bits, leaving gaping holes in the plot and character arcs. It's a shame - for my liking the production, script and performances were all on point. Soderbergh rarely gives us a hero, and it's hard to love or even care about some of the pivotal characters, especially the always watchable Sharon Stone in the role of a children's fiction writer (!!!), but there's enough levity and heart in the peripheral characters to have kept me invested. As other reviewers have noted, the conclusion won't satisfy many people. It didn't satisfy me. In fact, I presumed that there must be more episodes still to come. As anti-climaxes go, it's real heavy on the 'anti'. Plot threads and characters disappear. Improbable and inexplicable choices are made. It's rushed and messy and ultimately inconclusive. Unresolved endings leave you either dying to hook up with your mates to unravel the 'what ifs', or they leave you slack-jawed, shaking your fist at the telly as your eyes roll out of your head. I think most people will, sadly, end up in the latter category.

kingbestark I kept watching over and over and kept getting more confused. what was that symbol that petra kept seeing? a gir's tat, a decal on a car fender, the editing seems to be a huge problem. at first sharon stone was a celebrated member of the community and towards the end everyone was speaking about her like she was a joke. why did she tell that dirty joke when he brought his girlfriend over for a visit, made no sense, then she as a cougar offers him a place in lieu of handyman work, then she demands $ months later, and the constant dropping of f bombs at thanksgiving dinner in front of his parents (who never had a line by the way).

Abfabbb I was anticipating the release of this series and was so disappointed that I did not bother to watch episode 3. The first episode is strange and bland. I believe the issue to be with the dialogue. It tries too hard to be witty, hip, campy and it falls totally flat. Sharon Stone overacts and cannot get out of ingenue mode yet we are looking at a middle-aged woman with a Joker smile oozing coyness and trying to seduce a younger man. It was weirdly repulsive and boring at the same time. The second issue was the scenes were very choppy---jumping from one to another without giving the viewer any information or sense of a plot. So we just watch Sharon Stone complain that she lost her ass and then writhe in bed over someone correctly analyzing that she is a lonely, menopausal woman. Her gay friend 's dialogue is an offense to all LGBTQ people. The one star is for the French bulldog pet and Sharon Stone's costumes.