Phonearl Good start, but then it gets ruined

Animenter There are women in the film, but none has anything you could call a personality.

Hadrina The movie's neither hopeful in contrived ways, nor hopeless in different contrived ways. Somehow it manages to be wonderful

Fulke Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

Bene Cumb As for Cold War events, the Brits and lately the Germans as well have produced so many good series that, from time to time, one might wonder that is it possible to outmatch them, to possess good framework and maintaining thrill, yet without insipid cliches. It is to my liking to announce that The Game has got into the list of the best of them in every aspect: there are lots of twists and turns, including each episode ending, the cast is even and distinguished, the mood and era have skilfully captured, and - last but not least - high-society British English is heard all the time. Well, one might ponder if the situation in the UK was then so harsh and unpredictable, with suspicious persons in the very top of the society, but all this does not seem ridiculous, as the logic and shift of scenes are motivated. I liked all the episodes, and it is regrettable that only one season was produced. People like Brian Cox, Shaun Doodley, Victoria Hamilton are always pleasant to follow, they have no trivial roles.

paul2001sw-1 One part 'Tinker, Tailor', and one part 'Spooks', moody thriller 'The Game' tells the story of an attempt by the British government (in a thinly fictionalised 1970s) to spoil a major Soviet intelligence operation. There's the possibility of at least one mole, office politics, and a brooding air of tension amid general social decay. But what made John Le Carre's story so brilliant was its minimalism: not one thing happened that wasn't necessary for the plot. 'The Game' needs too many set pieces and seems to present an intelligence agency repeatedly guilty of both bizarre judgement and operational incompetence. The love story woven into the story has its own tragic conclusion; but none of the subtlety of George Smiley's complicated, broken relationship with Ann. Tom Hughes is underpowered in the lead role; the supporting cast, however, at least play their (somewhat stereotyped) parts with gusto.

John Pelosi I have just finished watching the final episode of The Game, and have to admit feeling on the one hand thoroughly satisfied and on the other, somewhat frustrated. On the positive side, this is a first rate drama with excellent production values - the acting is top notch, the characters well developed yet always leaving a sense that there is much kept hidden, the costumes, locations, cinematography and overall "feel" are spot on. The pace starts slowly - deliberately so - and picks up as the complex plot works its way inexorably towards its ultimate resolution. All in all, the feel is taught, suspenseful and engaging - this is a drama you are compelled to keep watching.And so to the frustrations - as others have pointed out, there are a number of very glaring screw-ups in plot and "fieldcraft" which seem utterly at odds with the otherwise high quality of the production. I won't repeat all the errors here, but suffice it to say, it was enough to take the gloss off an otherwise exemplary and novel BBC drama. I would, nevertheless, encourage you all to watch it - just cut it a little slack! I for one very much hope there will be further series with this excellent cast. I just hope they spend a little more of the budget ironing out the glitches - if they do, this will be a series to rival the very best spy dramas ever produced.

lewilewis1997 I'm a Cold War spy thriller fan, so I might as well say John Le Carre fan as he was and is the master of all that he surveys. So imagine my excitement that this was coming to my screen courtesy of the delectable Auntie Beeb? I hoped that it was 'in the style of...' and immediately hoped for a Smiley or two and I'm not talking about emoticons at the end of an email. It has all of the classic ingredients and some very canny actors. There is intrigue, cross and double cross, moles, double agents, mysterious and deadly bad guys, vulnerable good guys who actually believe in 'Queen And Country' blah, blah, blah. The look and feel are excellent, the attention to detail and resurrecting the crazy strike happy hyper inflationary IRA infested 70's is spot on. BUT ONE THING IS BUGGING ME MORE AND MORE AND IS MAKING THIS UNWATCHABLE...The terrible trade craft. What a bunch of amateurs! If you, like me, have devoured pretty much every Le Carre book going you will know a few tricks of the trade as well. My biggest bug bear is that the defector's handlers are also used for covert and mobile surveillance - this would never happen. Not then, not now. 'Watchers' are specially trained experts and would never be known to the 'target'. It doesn't seem to matter in this. Despite the high risk of discovery and blowing the operation they follow a defecting KGB double agent on more than one occasion. They don't even change their appearance like doff/remove a hat/glasses or change a jacket or the way they walk. Come on guys?! You get it so right, then blow it on minor details like this? Was it budgetary constraints? Not enough money for the extra's? You can fill the streets of London with a myriad of period dressed extra's and rare cars in mint condition but can't afford a few nefarious looking types like ex-safe crackers, burglars and pick pockets or plain Janes as MI5 did for these kind of jobs?Which brings me on to the question of the KGB Colonel, defecting for love, and to save the world. The KGB were very good at what they did. They knew how to dodge, dive, duck and disappear. This guy doesn't have a clue despite having a lot to hide. On a long drive through the country on a minor 'A' road he doesn't once double back, fake a breakdown to force followers to pass by or notice his own handler following 100 yards behind him in his own car with none in between?! Don't you at least change your number plates? Not in this apparently. And the Special Met Police fire arms guys? Hanging out of open windows in plain sight with Lee Enfield rifles despite the surveillance on this occasion being aimed at trapping the main bad guy; a top KGB assassin? Surely the first thing he would do is turn up early and check for traps and anything untoward on a chilly day. Wide open windows when it's cold would stand out a mile. How do we know it's a wee bit chilly? Extras dressed for an autumn day in macs and scarves are a clue. Shouldn't they have been a bit more professional and left the windows shut to hide behind the reflections and blend in with the others closed against the cold? Bullets take no notice of a flimsy glass barrier, so why open the windows and telegraph your positions?ENOUGH! Despite this being quite a classy production with actors that are definitely a cut above, these stupid mistakes are making it unwatchable. I will keep trying, but I think my neighbours are getting hacked off with me shouting at the telly in an angry fashion every Thursday night.This review will self destruct in five, four, three, two.............