Phonearl Good start, but then it gets ruined

GetPapa Far from Perfect, Far from Terrible

Intcatinfo A Masterpiece!

SparkMore n my opinion it was a great movie with some interesting elements, even though having some plot holes and the ending probably was just too messy and crammed together, but still fun to watch and not your casual movie that is similar to all other ones.

Manannan_MacLir A fascinating show that presents satellite imagery of unusual looking objects and then posits questions as to what we are looking at. They give you the location that you can look up on Google maps, so you can be interactive with the show. Clever that the answer is not given right away, as it causes the viewer to actually wonder what it is that is being examined. Sometimes they can get a closer look, and determine what it is, but other times the area is simply inaccessible. I've ended up purchasing all the seasons on Amazon, and I watch the episodes repeatedly. I've always loved looking at maps, and since I find that I look up the locations on google maps and frequently then look up and read more about the locations, I find this show intelligent and thought provoking.To address some other comments; A scientist wearing an 'Aperture Labs' shirt means only that they may be a sci-fi fan or possibly shop at Thinkgeek. I have an Initech mug. Big deal. That's not a valid criticism. Also, I'm rating this as a 10 as I not only consider this to be among my favorite shows and that is my legit rating, but I need to offset giving a 1, as that reveals more about the lack of intelligence of the reviewer than the show itself. A 1 should be reserved for manufactured garbage like The Bachelor or Keeping up with the Kardashians.

Huruhara Davidson I think all the "scientists" are hired actors. Used to be 1 of my favourite series in Discovery Science, but at 1 point when I realised that the "experts" are contradicting themselves (1st they present a theory, then another, then eventually the very same "expert" is the 1 who explains the real cause of the said phenomenon) that is when I thought that these are all staged.

Zachary Bower A science channel show where the premise is to look for bizarre images of objects on earth seen from satellites, and try to explain what they are. 3-4 images are featured per episode. I was wary this show might feature a lot of pseudoscience, but I think it does a pretty good job demonstrating the difference between speculation and science.Authors and journalists are interviewed, some with very outlandish claims, but their ideas are presented critically, with any holes pointed out by the scientists also being interviewed. Googling these scientists, they seem legitimate; their credentials accurately stated, no accusations of unethical research, etc. Unfortunately, who is saying what may not be completely clear to anyone not looking for it, as the show moves through different arguments so fast.You often don't find the real answer, which is to be expected, but either way I think the journey is a real treat. You could hear about an abandoned island which turns out to be a forced labor camp from WWII. Or about intricate designs in the desert, rumored to point to a lost city reported by an 1800s explorer, only to find out that it's a farm coincidentally pointing to an unusual rock formation.Along the way, you learn different facts about history, meteorology, military technology, geology, and most importantly, satellite imaging. The single biggest problem with this show is that so many of the segments are reused, being literally copied and pasted into different episodes. So the actual amount of content is probably only about half of the show's length.The knowledge is pretty esoteric, so I don't recommend it for basic education, but if you're a fan of science and mystery, I'd check it out in spite of its flaws.

jjgsports At first I was super excited to see the show thinking hey maybe they will have cool top secret things that we don't really know. It turns out they just show really stupid things with increasingly stupid reasons for why its there. Not only that but they have fake scientists that take forever to get to the point and if that weren't bad enough, they jam the EXACT SAME content into "new"episodes. It's abysmal that they can even get away with calling them new episodes. Such a shame that they fail miserably at what could be a good show. Just wiki search weird Google map photos and you will get to the point faster and get better answers than this show will give you.