GamerTab
That was an excellent one.
Robert Joyner
The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one
Cassandra
Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.
Jerrie
It's a good bad... and worth a popcorn matinée. While it's easy to lament what could have been...
allynwilk
I think you're all watching the show wrong. All of those colors?! All of those sounds?! Just watched it stoned. Instant 10/10!
spinbunny
Gigi - annoying....just shut it.
That clock - could it be any louder?Daniel? Such an arse. Love to hate him --- oh he is so horrid.
ccenger
So refreshing after watching American cooking shows to have contestants not attacking each other and where you actually don't want them to be eliminated. The assistant, Gigi, however looks like she's constantly judging you and all she really does is call out the time like a nag.
krae-59290
All of the bakers were so genuine and nice and the people running the show just seemed so rude. In the FIRST episode the bakers are told to make a dish as a reflection of themselves and Wendy saw herself as simple and classic, so that's what she made. Zumbo and Khoo tore her apart because it was too simple. But holy heck, wasn't the point to be a reflection of yourself? Who are they to criticize? They don't know her, and I'm sure they don't care to. Gigi only comes around to knock people off their horses. She is never helpful, she makes everyone more anxious which is so rude. She should be there to maybe be support or guidance for these AMATEUR BAKERS WHO ARE TRYING THEIR BEST! She's just there to add a pretty face who I can't even look at as too attractive because all she does is yell. I try not to judge books by covers but the only way she is portrayed upsets me and I wish she seemed kinder. Also, in every episode you know who comes out on top and on the bottom. That's always who they focus on. It's never a surprise, which just kind of stinks because it would be exciting to have no clue. One baked, Amie, the show never gave her a good interview or discussion until literally the FOURTH episode. I was watching and I saw her and I was like, heck, who is this girl now? I mean, she was there, they just never focused on her until she did something spectacular. And they don't focusp on anyone expect for just then or when they suck...or when they are only trying to express themselves but their form of expression is wrONG. The bakers are all so talented. More talented than most who watch it, and that's what's kept me going, to see who really deserved the title. I really liked Kate but Ali really deserved that win. She was the top baker the most and Kate was in the bottom two the most. So Ali always did better and lost by just one point. I feel like whoever was in charge of this show really targeted who they wanted to win and it was all judged on two people's (Zumbo and Khoo's) tastebuds, which is not the most fair way to do it because like, I love red velvet but they didn't seem to, which at one point was part of why somebody was thrown into a Zumbo test. Also, it definitely took Zumbo longer than the amount of time contestants were given to bake...like...really...how in the heck? I will stop now, my little liberal heart can not take it. Everyone should have a chance to not be knocked down. It feels unfair and I'm all for equality.
